Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. CDNS Peers
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $286.79 | +0.80% | 78.3B | 72.61 | $3.95 | N/A |
| SAP | $303.00 | +2.04% | 353.5B | 54.69 | $5.54 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $265.18 | -0.65% | 254.4B | 41.56 | $6.38 | +0.61% |
| INTU | $753.47 | -0.50% | 210.2B | 61.66 | $12.22 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $1,011.09 | -0.41% | 209.3B | 136.45 | $7.41 | N/A |
| UBER | $84.10 | -0.23% | 175.9B | 15.43 | $5.45 | N/A |
| SHOP | $107.11 | -0.55% | 138.5B | 86.38 | $1.24 | N/A |
| APP | $393.26 | +2.35% | 133.1B | 72.03 | $5.46 | N/A |
| MSTR | $369.19 | -0.39% | 100.9B | -16.30 | -$22.65 | N/A |
| SNOW | $205.68 | +1.67% | 68.6B | -48.86 | -$4.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 353.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SAP trades at $303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CRM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CRM trades at $265.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INTU Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while INTU trades at $753.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NOW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while NOW trades at $1,011.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 136.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs UBER Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while UBER trades at $84.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SHOP trades at $107.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 86.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs APP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while APP trades at $393.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 72.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while MSTR trades at $369.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SNOW trades at $205.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -48.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while WDAY trades at $247.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 137.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ADSK trades at $296.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while TEAM trades at $207.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -132.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FICO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while FICO trades at $1,726.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DDOG trades at $117.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 250.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TTD Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while TTD trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 94.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while HUBS trades at $589.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1474.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ANSS trades at $330.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs STRK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while STRK trades at $103.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs STRF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while STRF trades at $103.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TYL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while TYL trades at $577.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 87.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ZM trades at $81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DUOL trades at $519.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 259.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PTC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PTC trades at $168.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SSNC trades at $80.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while GRAB trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 487.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while GWRE trades at $214.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1023.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DOCU trades at $88.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DT trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while MNDY trades at $297.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 294.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PAYC trades at $259.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BSY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BSY trades at $47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BKI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MANH Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while MANH trades at $188.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs XM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs U Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while U trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas U's P/E ratio is -23.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NICE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while NICE trades at $165.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PCTY trades at $190.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while TTAN trades at $110.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PCOR trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.10. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DSGX trades at $115.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 70.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs QXO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while QXO trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -48.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DAY trades at $59.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 369.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ESTC trades at $80.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -61.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PEGA trades at $98.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CVLT trades at $183.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 109.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NATI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs APPF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while APPF trades at $211.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while GTLB trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1137.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SRAD trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 125.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while OTEX trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CWAN trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while LYFT trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 108.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs VERX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while VERX trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -136.45. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs COUP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SYT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SYT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ETWO-WT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while IDCC trades at $217.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while QTWO trades at $87.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -257.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BULL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BULL trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FROG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while FROG trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.48. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs LIF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while LIF trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 488.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GRND Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while GRND trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -39.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while FRSH trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BILL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BILL trades at $43.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2182.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INTA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while INTA trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -229.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ASAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ASAN trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CVT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SOUN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while SOUN trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.14. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BRZE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BRZE trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RUM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while RUM trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RUMBW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while RUMBW trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs WK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while WK trades at $67.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AYX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ENV Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BL trades at $55.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INST Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ZETA trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -54.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs COMP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while COMP trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -45.46. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NCNO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while NCNO trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -105.20. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BLKB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BLKB trades at $62.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CALX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CALX trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -88.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while GBTG trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -62.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AGYS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while AGYS trades at $105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 129.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALKT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ALKT trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -77.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RIOT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while RIOT trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALIT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ALIT trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -91.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALRM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while ALRM trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DAVE trades at $200.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PAR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PAR trades at $65.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PRGS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while PRGS trades at $61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BTDR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while BTDR trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DCT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CLSK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 78.3B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $286.79, while CLSK trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.61, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.