Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $356.97 | -2.08% | 97.5B | 97.00 | $3.68 | N/A |
| SAP | $283.00 | -1.29% | 329.5B | 43.87 | $6.45 | +0.93% |
| CRM | $250.74 | -2.94% | 239.6B | 39.29 | $6.38 | +0.65% |
| INTU | $776.15 | -1.14% | 216.5B | 63.26 | $12.27 | +0.54% |
| NOW | $914.37 | -3.05% | 190.1B | 115.40 | $7.92 | N/A |
| UBER | $86.91 | -0.96% | 181.8B | 15.22 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $118.60 | -2.95% | 154B | 96.42 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $379.17 | -2.95% | 128.3B | 68.69 | $5.52 | N/A |
| STRK | $106.00 | -4.68% | 113B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSTR | $366.63 | -8.77% | 103.9B | 25.69 | $14.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 329.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SAP trades at $283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
CDNS vs CRM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 239.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CRM trades at $250.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
CDNS vs INTU Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while INTU trades at $776.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
CDNS vs NOW Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 190.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while NOW trades at $914.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 115.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
CDNS vs UBER Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 181.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while UBER trades at $86.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 154B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SHOP trades at $118.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 96.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
CDNS vs APP Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while APP trades at $379.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 68.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
CDNS vs STRK Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while STRK trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while MSTR trades at $366.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SNOW trades at $205.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -48.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ADSK trades at $297.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.88. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while WDAY trades at $222.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 122.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while TEAM trades at $182.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -110.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DDOG trades at $135.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 282.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
CDNS vs TTD Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while TTD trades at $86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 104.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTD's competition here
CDNS vs FICO Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while FICO trades at $1,381.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 54.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
CDNS vs STRF Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while STRF trades at $117.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while HUBS trades at $498.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1159.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
CDNS vs PTC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PTC trades at $212.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
CDNS vs TYL Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while TYL trades at $581.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 83.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
CDNS vs ZM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ZM trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SSNC trades at $84.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while GRAB trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while GWRE trades at $222.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 518.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
CDNS vs BSY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BSY trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 73.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DUOL trades at $338.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 168.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
CDNS vs DT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DT trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DOCU trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
CDNS vs U Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while U trades at $31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas U's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PAYC trades at $226.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
CDNS vs MANH Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while MANH trades at $214.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 59.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
CDNS vs QXO Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while QXO trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -55.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QXO's competition here
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while MNDY trades at $250.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 250.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
CDNS vs BKI Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
CDNS vs APPF Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while APPF trades at $319.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 59.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
CDNS vs XM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while TTAN trades at $113.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -30.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PCTY trades at $181.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PEGA trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
CDNS vs NICE Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while NICE trades at $152.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PCOR trades at $62.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -72.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SRAD trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 147.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DSGX trades at $104.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
CDNS vs DAY Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DAY trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 345.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ESTC trades at $79.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -76.47. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CVLT trades at $179.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 99.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
CDNS vs NATI Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while OTEX trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while GTLB trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 464.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while IDCC trades at $252.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
CDNS vs BULL Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BULL trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
CDNS vs COUP Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CWAN trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
CDNS vs LIF Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while LIF trades at $74.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 572.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LIF's competition here
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while LYFT trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 90.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
CDNS vs VERX Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while VERX trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -111.38. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VERX's competition here
CDNS vs FROG Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while FROG trades at $41.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -59.04. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while QTWO trades at $76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1275.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
CDNS vs WK Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while WK trades at $84.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -72.79. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
CDNS vs BILL Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BILL trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2085.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
CDNS vs CVT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
CDNS vs COMP Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while COMP trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -78.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COMP's competition here
CDNS vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while SOUN trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SOUN's competition here
CDNS vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while RIOT trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RIOT's competition here
CDNS vs ETWO-WT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ETWO-WT's competition here
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while FRSH trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -70.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here
CDNS vs CALX Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CALX trades at $56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -136.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CALX's competition here
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ZETA trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -60.32. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
CDNS vs AYX Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
CDNS vs RUM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while RUM trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RUM's competition here
CDNS vs ENV Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
CDNS vs INST Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INST's competition here
CDNS vs ZI Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZI's competition here
CDNS vs GRND Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while GRND trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -28.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND's competition here
CDNS vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while RUMBW trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RUMBW's competition here
CDNS vs BL Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BL trades at $52.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BL's competition here
CDNS vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ASAN trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ASAN's competition here
CDNS vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while AGYS trades at $114.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 234.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AGYS's competition here
CDNS vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BLKB trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLKB's competition here
CDNS vs INTA Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while INTA trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -162.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTA's competition here
CDNS vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while NCNO trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -108.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NCNO's competition here
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DAVE trades at $232.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 65.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
CDNS vs DAVEW Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DAVEW trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVEW's competition here
CDNS vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while CLSK trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CLSK's competition here
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while GBTG trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GBTG's competition here
CDNS vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BRZE trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BRZE's competition here
CDNS vs ALIT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ALIT trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -84.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ALIT's competition here
CDNS vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while ALRM trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ALRM's competition here
CDNS vs YOU Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while YOU trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
CDNS vs DCT Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DCT's competition here
CDNS vs DV Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while DV trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DV's competition here
CDNS vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while BTDR trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BTDR's competition here
CDNS vs PAR Comparison August 2025
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 97.5B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $356.97, while PAR trades at $58.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 97.00, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -22.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAR's competition here