Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. CDNS Peers
See (CDNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $295.40 | -0.49% | 80.7B | 74.97 | $3.94 | N/A |
| SAP | $287.66 | -0.74% | 335.6B | 51.37 | $5.60 | +0.91% |
| CRM | $260.63 | +0.43% | 249.2B | 40.85 | $6.38 | +0.78% |
| INTU | $761.14 | +0.84% | 212.3B | 62.34 | $12.21 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $970.85 | -1.14% | 201.1B | 131.02 | $7.41 | N/A |
| UBER | $83.72 | +0.33% | 175.1B | 14.66 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $106.40 | +0.41% | 138B | 86.50 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $324.70 | -5.71% | 109.9B | 58.61 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $369.70 | +0.18% | 101.1B | -16.62 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| SNOW | $212.00 | -0.04% | 70.7B | -50.36 | -$4.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNS vs SAP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 335.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SAP trades at $287.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 51.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CRM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 249.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CRM trades at $260.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INTU Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 212.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while INTU trades at $761.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NOW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 201.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while NOW trades at $970.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 131.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs UBER Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 175.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while UBER trades at $83.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SHOP trades at $106.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 86.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs APP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while APP trades at $324.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 58.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while MSTR trades at $369.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SNOW trades at $212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -50.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while WDAY trades at $238.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ADSK trades at $297.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while TEAM trades at $189.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -114.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DDOG trades at $127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 271.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FICO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while FICO trades at $1,806.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 77.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TTD Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while TTD trades at $68.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 83.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ANSS trades at $334.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while HUBS trades at $534.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1215.86. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs STRK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while STRK trades at $102.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs STRF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while STRF trades at $104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TYL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while TYL trades at $569.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ZM trades at $77.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DUOL trades at $471.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 234.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PTC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PTC trades at $166.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while GWRE trades at $237.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 553.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SSNC trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while GRAB trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 449.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DT trades at $54.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DOCU trades at $75.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BSY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BSY trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while MNDY trades at $280.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 304.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs QXO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while QXO trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -67.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PAYC trades at $232.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BKI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs MANH Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while MANH trades at $186.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs XM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NICE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while NICE trades at $162.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PCOR trades at $66.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -77.48. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PCTY trades at $176.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs U Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while U trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while TTAN trades at $104.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DAY Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DAY trades at $56.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 353.50. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ESTC trades at $82.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -78.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DSGX trades at $99.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 60.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PEGA trades at $99.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs APPF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while APPF trades at $223.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NATI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SRAD trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 133.68. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CVLT trades at $170.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 102.06. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while OTEX trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while GTLB trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 452.89. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs COUP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CWAN trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while LYFT trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 96.87. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while IDCC trades at $227.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while QTWO trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -260.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs VERX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while VERX trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -117.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ETWO-WT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BULL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BULL trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs LIF Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while LIF trades at $61.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 476.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FROG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while FROG trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -57.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BILL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BILL trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2185.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GRND Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while GRND trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while FRSH trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INTA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while INTA trades at $52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -219.83. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CVT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs SOUN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while SOUN trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZI Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RUM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while RUM trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs WK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while WK trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -56.39. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RUMBW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while RUMBW trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AYX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ENV Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs INST Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs RIOT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while RIOT trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BL Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BL trades at $54.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ZETA trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -56.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs COMP Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while COMP trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs KC Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while KC trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ASAN Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ASAN trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CALX Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CALX trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -91.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs NCNO Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while NCNO trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -105.80. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs AGYS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while AGYS trades at $108.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 132.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BLKB Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BLKB trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs GBTG Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while GBTG trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALKT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ALKT trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -75.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs BRZE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while BRZE trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALIT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ALIT trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -90.08. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DAVEW Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DAVEW trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DAVE trades at $211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 59.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs ALRM Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while ALRM trades at $56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PRGS Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PRGS trades at $62.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs PAR Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while PAR trades at $63.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -24.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs CLSK Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while CLSK trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.
CDNS vs DCT Comparison
CDNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 80.7B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $295.40, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.97, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.