Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BKKT-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKKT-WT | -$6.59 | -4308.17% | 121.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $389.00 | +0.00% | 3T | 25.06 | $15.99 | +0.87% |
| ORCL | $146.14 | +0.00% | 425B | 27.85 | $5.31 | +1.34% |
| PLTR | $128.84 | +0.00% | 307.5B | 212.99 | $0.63 | N/A |
| ADBE | $255.17 | +0.00% | 107.9B | 15.44 | $16.70 | N/A |
| PANW | $141.67 | +0.00% | 101B | 91.67 | $1.58 | N/A |
| CRWD | $350.25 | +0.00% | 91.6B | -288.34 | -$1.26 | N/A |
| SNPS | $440.72 | +0.00% | 85.8B | 55.58 | $8.07 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
| NET | $163.81 | +0.00% | 60.5B | -592.38 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BKKT-WT vs MSFT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while MSFT trades at $389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check MSFT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ORCL Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 425B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ORCL trades at $146.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ORCL's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PLTR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 307.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PLTR trades at $128.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 212.99. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PLTR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ADBE Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ADBE trades at $255.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ADBE's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PANW Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PANW trades at $141.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 91.67. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PANW's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CRWD Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CRWD trades at $350.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -288.34. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CRWD's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SNPS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SNPS trades at $440.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.58. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SNPS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs VMW Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check VMW's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NET Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NET trades at $163.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -592.38. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NET's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FTNT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FTNT trades at $75.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FTNT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SQ Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SQ's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CRWV Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CRWV trades at $99.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -59.04. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CRWV's competition here
BKKT-WT vs XYZ Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while XYZ trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check XYZ's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NETE Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NETE's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SPLK Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SPLK's competition here
BKKT-WT vs MDB Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while MDB trades at $312.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -379.51. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check MDB's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ZS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ZS trades at $149.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -622.80. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ZS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CPAY Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CPAY trades at $338.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CPAY's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FLT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FLT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CYBR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CYBR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs VRSN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while VRSN trades at $213.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check VRSN's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CHKP Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CHKP trades at $152.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CHKP's competition here
BKKT-WT vs AFRM Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while AFRM trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 59.23. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check AFRM's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FFIV Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FFIV trades at $272.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FFIV's competition here
BKKT-WT vs TOST Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while TOST trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check TOST's competition here
BKKT-WT vs IOT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while IOT trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -392.14. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check IOT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs AKAM Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while AKAM trades at $100.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check AKAM's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NLOK Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NLOK's competition here
BKKT-WT vs KSPI Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while KSPI trades at $71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check KSPI's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GEN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GEN trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GEN's competition here
BKKT-WT vs OKTA Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while OKTA trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 66.37. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check OKTA's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CFLT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CFLT trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.63. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CFLT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GDDY Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GDDY trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GDDY's competition here
BKKT-WT vs RBRK Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while RBRK trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -33.63. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check RBRK's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NTNX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NTNX trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NTNX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ALTR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ALTR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PLAN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PLAN's competition here
BKKT-WT vs INFA Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check INFA's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SAIL Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SAIL trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SAIL's competition here
BKKT-WT vs DOX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while DOX trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check DOX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs HCP Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check HCP's competition here
BKKT-WT vs JCOM Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check JCOM's competition here
BKKT-WT vs DBX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while DBX trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check DBX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SQSP Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SQSP's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NEWR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NEWR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs KLAR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while KLAR trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -49.83. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check KLAR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CCCS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CCCS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CORZ Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CORZ trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CORZ's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CORZZ Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CORZZ trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CORZZ's competition here
BKKT-WT vs DOCN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while DOCN trades at $62.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check DOCN's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PATH Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PATH trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PATH's competition here
BKKT-WT vs KVYO Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while KVYO trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -156.64. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check KVYO's competition here
BKKT-WT vs WEX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while WEX trades at $150.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check WEX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FOUR Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FOUR trades at $58.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FOUR's competition here
BKKT-WT vs BLSH Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while BLSH trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check BLSH's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NVEI Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NVEI's competition here
BKKT-WT vs STNE Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while STNE trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -27.21. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check STNE's competition here
BKKT-WT vs S Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while S trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check S's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ACIW Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ACIW trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ACIW's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CCC Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CCC trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -633.50. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CCC's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ESMT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ESMT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs WIX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while WIX trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check WIX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs DLO Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while DLO trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check DLO's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CORZW Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CORZW trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CORZW's competition here
BKKT-WT vs RELY Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while RELY trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check RELY's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CLBT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CLBT trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CLBT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs BOX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while BOX trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check BOX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs QLYS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while QLYS trades at $86.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check QLYS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PAGS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PAGS trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PAGS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SWI Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SWI's competition here
BKKT-WT vs EVOP Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check EVOP's competition here
BKKT-WT vs EEFT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while EEFT trades at $68.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check EEFT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs TDC Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while TDC trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check TDC's competition here
BKKT-WT vs VRNS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while VRNS trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check VRNS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PICS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PICS trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PICS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs CSGS Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while CSGS trades at $79.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check CSGS's competition here
BKKT-WT vs TENB Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while TENB trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check TENB's competition here
BKKT-WT vs AVPT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while AVPT trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -1023.00. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check AVPT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs NTCT Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while NTCT trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check NTCT's competition here
BKKT-WT vs WRD Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while WRD trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check WRD's competition here
BKKT-WT vs AVDX Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check AVDX's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GETVV Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GETVV's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SPSC Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SPSC trades at $54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SPSC's competition here
BKKT-WT vs BB Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while BB trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 85.50. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check BB's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FORG Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FORG's competition here
BKKT-WT vs APPN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while APPN trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -263.30. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check APPN's competition here
BKKT-WT vs EVCM Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while EVCM trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -133.50. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check EVCM's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GSKY Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GSKY's competition here
BKKT-WT vs PAYO Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while PAYO trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check PAYO's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GET Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GET's competition here
BKKT-WT vs MQ Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while MQ trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -42.89. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check MQ's competition here
BKKT-WT vs RAMP Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while RAMP trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check RAMP's competition here
BKKT-WT vs STER Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check STER's competition here
BKKT-WT vs EVTC Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while EVTC trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check EVTC's competition here
BKKT-WT vs TUYA Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while TUYA trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check TUYA's competition here
BKKT-WT vs ZUO Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check ZUO's competition here
BKKT-WT vs SUMO Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check SUMO's competition here
BKKT-WT vs GB Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check GB's competition here
BKKT-WT vs FIVN Comparison February 2026
BKKT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BKKT-WT stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKKT-WT is priced at -$6.59, while FIVN trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BKKT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, BKKT-WT's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BKKT-WT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKKT-WT.Check FIVN's competition here