American Software, Inc.

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 204.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SAP trades at $175.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SAP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CRM trades at $180.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CRM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APP trades at $481.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check APP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while UBER trades at $71.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check UBER's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SHOP trades at $103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 100.97. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SHOP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NOW trades at $102.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NOW's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDNS trades at $373.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 87.29. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CDNS's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADBE trades at $244.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ADBE's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INTU trades at $319.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check INTU's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DDOG trades at $222.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 570.05. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DDOG's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SNOW trades at $172.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -43.49. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SNOW's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADSK trades at $240.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ADSK's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MSTR trades at $159.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MSTR's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WDAY trades at $128.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 49.28. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check WDAY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ROP trades at $326.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ROP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ANSS's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GTOP trades at $47.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GTOP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZM trades at $105.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRF trades at $101.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRF's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRC trades at $99.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FICO trades at $1,239.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FICO's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TEAM trades at $85.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -104.16. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TEAM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STRK trades at $73.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STRK's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PTC trades at $148.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PTC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check AZPN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SSNC trades at $67.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SSNC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRAB trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 87.75. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GRAB's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TYL trades at $313.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.13. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TYL's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DT trades at $41.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 76.30. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GWRE trades at $140.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 63.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GWRE's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BKI's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DAY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while U trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas U's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check U's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FIG trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FIG's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check XM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CDAY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while HUBS trades at $201.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 109.17. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check HUBS's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BSY trades at $33.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BSY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DOCU trades at $49.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DOCU's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FROG trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -134.53. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FROG's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while YMM trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check YMM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check OCFT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MANH trades at $138.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MANH's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NATI's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SMAR's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PAYC trades at $137.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PAYC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CWAN trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.06. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CWAN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCOR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -91.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PCOR's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while IDCC trades at $260.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check IDCC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DSGX trades at $71.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DSGX's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check COUP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PCTY trades at $113.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PCTY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while YOU trades at $60.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check YOU's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while TTAN trades at $63.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -36.51. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check TTAN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while APPF trades at $164.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check APPF's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PEGA trades at $34.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PEGA's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while OTEX trades at $23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check OTEX's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ESTC trades at $54.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -69.35. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ESTC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NICE trades at $94.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NICE's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LYFT trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check LYFT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while COMP trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 420.25. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check COMP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DUOL trades at $106.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DUOL's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GBTG trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GBTG's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZETA trades at $18.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -188.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZETA's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NAVN trades at $19.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NAVN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GTLB trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -78.62. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GTLB's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVLT trades at $107.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CVLT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check GRND-WT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while KC trades at $14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check KC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check CVT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PYCR's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while MNDY trades at $79.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check MNDY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SRAD trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 50.13. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SRAD's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RNG trades at $43.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.30. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check RNG's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PWSC's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BILL trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -157.00. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BILL's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BOX trades at $25.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BOX's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while RUM trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -19.08. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check RUM's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while SOUN trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check SOUN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check AYX's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while STUB trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check STUB's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ENV's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check INST's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BTDR trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BTDR's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ZI's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NATL trades at $44.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NATL's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BULL trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BULL's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while LIF trades at $40.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check LIF's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DAVE trades at $228.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DAVE's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while ADEA trades at $26.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check ADEA's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while QTWO trades at $46.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check QTWO's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while PTRN trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check PTRN's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while WK trades at $50.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 209.54. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check WK's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while BRZE trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -19.96. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check BRZE's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while NP trades at $27.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -154.61. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check NP's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DBD trades at $74.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DBD's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FSLY trades at $16.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FSLY's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check DCT's competition here

AMSWA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMSWA stands at 388.5M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMSWA is priced at $10.95, while FRSH trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMSWA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.56, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, AMSWA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMSWA is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMSWA.Check FRSH's competition here