Affirm Holdings, Inc.
Affirm Holdings, Inc. AFRM Peers
See (AFRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | $51.71 | -1.64% | 16.68B | -272.16 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| MSFT | $458.87 | +1.01% | 3.41T | 35.43 | $12.95 | +0.71% |
| ORCL | $159.62 | -0.54% | 447.61B | 37.56 | $4.25 | +1.06% |
| PLTR | $126.33 | -2.46% | 298.13B | 549.26 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $420.68 | +0.85% | 179.29B | 27.79 | $15.14 | N/A |
| PANW | $194.30 | +0.68% | 128.65B | 109.16 | $1.78 | N/A |
| CRWD | $444.35 | +1.16% | 110.68B | -4937.22 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.75 | +0.15% | 80.18B | 43.11 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $516.13 | +0.33% | 79.80B | 61.96 | $8.33 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AFRM vs MSFT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.41T. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while MSFT trades at $458.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ORCL Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 447.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ORCL trades at $159.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PLTR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 298.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PLTR trades at $126.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 549.26. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ADBE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 179.29B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ADBE trades at $420.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PANW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 128.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PANW trades at $194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 109.16. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CRWD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 110.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CRWD trades at $444.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4937.22. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FTNT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FTNT trades at $104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SNPS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 79.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SNPS trades at $516.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 61.96. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VMW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs HOOD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 56.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while HOOD trades at $64.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NET Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 54.61B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NET trades at $157.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -656.48. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SQ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CRWV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 41.56B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CRWV trades at $86.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -34.23. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ZS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 39.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ZS trades at $252.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2525.70. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs XYZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 35.91B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while XYZ trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NETE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs IOT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 27.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while IOT trades at $47.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -170.14. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GDDY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 27.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GDDY trades at $189.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VRSN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.51B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while VRSN trades at $282.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SPLK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TOST Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while TOST trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 165.56. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CPAY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CPAY trades at $348.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CHKP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CHKP trades at $218.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NTNX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 22.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NTNX trades at $83.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -319.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FLT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs OKTA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 21.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while OKTA trades at $126.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2107.33. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GEN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GEN trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CYBR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.28B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CYBR trades at $349.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -172.92. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RBRK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.78B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while RBRK trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FFIV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FFIV trades at $285.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs KSPI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while KSPI trades at $85.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs MDB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while MDB trades at $189.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -109.89. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NLOK Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AKAM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while AKAM trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DOX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while DOX trades at $91.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SAIL Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SAIL trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs WIX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while WIX trades at $180.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 76.69. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ALTR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PLAN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs KVYO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while KVYO trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -202.59. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DBX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while DBX trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CFLT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CFLT trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -22.57. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs HCP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PATH Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PATH trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -96.77. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs JCOM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs INFA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while INFA trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 648.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SQSP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs S Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while S trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.72. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NEWR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FOUR Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FOUR trades at $90.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CCCS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CCCS trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 915.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SPSC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SPSC trades at $149.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 69.76. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs VRNS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while VRNS trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -57.20. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ACIW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ACIW trades at $49.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs QLYS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while QLYS trades at $136.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NVEI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EEFT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while EEFT trades at $110.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs WEX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while WEX trades at $137.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs BOX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while BOX trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RELY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while RELY trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -751.33. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CLBT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CLBT trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TENB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while TENB trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -85.92. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ESMT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVPT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while AVPT trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -146.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs STNE Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while STNE trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.21. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ODD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ODD trades at $64.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DLO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while DLO trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CORZ trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZZ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CORZZ trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SWI Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVOP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PAGS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PAGS trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs DOCN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while DOCN trades at $30.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PAYO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PAYO trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs MQ Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while MQ trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVTC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while EVTC trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs APPN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while APPN trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -38.84. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs BB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while BB trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -390.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TDC Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while TDC trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FIVN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FIVN trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -453.83. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GETVV Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVDX Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while AVDX trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs FORG Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RAMP Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while RAMP trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -729.50. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GSKY Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CSGS Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CSGS trades at $64.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs EVCM Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while EVCM trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -84.25. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GET Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs NTCT Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while NTCT trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs STER Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs CORZW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while CORZW trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ZUO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs AVPTW Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while AVPTW trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs SUMO Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs GB Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs RPD Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while RPD trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs TUYA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while TUYA trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 263.75. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs PAYA Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.
AFRM vs ATEN Comparison
AFRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRM stands at 16.68B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRM is priced at $51.71, while ATEN trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRM currently has a P/E ratio of -272.16, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, AFRM's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRM is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRM.