Xylem Inc. (XYL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XYL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYL | $116.45 | -0.47% | 27.7B | 29.68 | $3.92 | +1.42% |
| PH | $968.92 | -2.12% | 122.1B | 31.52 | $30.73 | +0.76% |
| TT | $477.89 | -5.08% | 105.6B | 36.82 | $12.98 | +0.83% |
| CMI | $685.87 | -5.73% | 94.6B | 28.58 | $23.98 | +1.17% |
| EMR | $143.49 | -1.27% | 80.4B | 23.37 | $6.14 | +1.53% |
| ITW | $267.71 | -1.07% | 77B | 24.85 | $10.77 | +2.37% |
| PCAR | $120.68 | -0.82% | 63.5B | 25.68 | $4.70 | +2.27% |
| CARR | $73.59 | -3.17% | 61.2B | 29.45 | $2.50 | +1.26% |
| ROK | $476.82 | -0.54% | 53B | 39.04 | $12.21 | +1.14% |
| IR | $81.37 | -0.40% | 31.9B | 24.04 | $3.39 | +0.10% |
Stock Comparison
XYL vs PH Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PH trades at $968.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PH's competition here
XYL vs TT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while TT trades at $477.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check TT's competition here
XYL vs CMI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CMI trades at $685.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CMI's competition here
XYL vs EMR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while EMR trades at $143.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check EMR's competition here
XYL vs ITW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while ITW trades at $267.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check ITW's competition here
XYL vs PCAR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PCAR trades at $120.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PCAR's competition here
XYL vs CARR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CARR trades at $73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CARR's competition here
XYL vs ROK Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while ROK trades at $476.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check ROK's competition here
XYL vs IR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while IR trades at $81.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check IR's competition here
XYL vs DOV Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while DOV trades at $225.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check DOV's competition here
XYL vs OTIS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while OTIS trades at $73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check OTIS's competition here
XYL vs INIO Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while INIO trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 266.93. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check INIO's competition here
XYL vs SYM Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SYM trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SYM's competition here
XYL vs P Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while P trades at $69.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas P's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check P's competition here
XYL vs MAIR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MAIR trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAIR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MAIR's competition here
XYL vs FTV Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while FTV trades at $61.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check FTV's competition here
XYL vs ITT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while ITT trades at $193.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check ITT's competition here
XYL vs IEX Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while IEX trades at $227.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check IEX's competition here
XYL vs NDSN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while NDSN trades at $301.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check NDSN's competition here
XYL vs GNRC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GNRC trades at $278.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GNRC's competition here
XYL vs RRX Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while RRX trades at $219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check RRX's competition here
XYL vs GGG Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GGG trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GGG's competition here
XYL vs CR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CR trades at $219.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CR's competition here
XYL vs PNR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PNR trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PNR's competition here
XYL vs WTS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while WTS trades at $359.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check WTS's competition here
XYL vs SPXC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SPXC trades at $231.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SPXC's competition here
XYL vs DCI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while DCI trades at $88.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check DCI's competition here
XYL vs GTLS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GTLS trades at $208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GTLS's competition here
XYL vs FLS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while FLS trades at $72.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check FLS's competition here
XYL vs OKLO Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while OKLO trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -59.61. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check OKLO's competition here
XYL vs AOS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while AOS trades at $61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check AOS's competition here
XYL vs NPO Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while NPO trades at $379.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check NPO's competition here
XYL vs MIDD Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MIDD trades at $173.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MIDD's competition here
XYL vs GTES Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GTES trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GTES's competition here
XYL vs JBTM Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while JBTM trades at $139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check JBTM's competition here
XYL vs AEBIV Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check AEBIV's competition here
XYL vs PSN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PSN trades at $50.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PSN's competition here
XYL vs XMTR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while XMTR trades at $94.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is 196.60. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check XMTR's competition here
XYL vs CSWI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CSWI's competition here
XYL vs FELE Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while FELE trades at $107.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check FELE's competition here
XYL vs CSW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CSW trades at $282.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CSW's competition here
XYL vs MIR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MIR trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MIR's competition here
XYL vs MWA Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MWA trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MWA's competition here
XYL vs SXI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SXI trades at $340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SXI's competition here
XYL vs AIMC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check AIMC's competition here
XYL vs JBT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check JBT's competition here
XYL vs KAI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while KAI trades at $324.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check KAI's competition here
XYL vs GTLS-PB Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
XYL vs HLIO Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HLIO trades at $90.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HLIO's competition here
XYL vs CXT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CXT trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CXT's competition here
XYL vs ATS Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while ATS trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check ATS's competition here
XYL vs MIR-WT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MIR-WT's competition here
XYL vs GRC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GRC trades at $89.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GRC's competition here
XYL vs HI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HI's competition here
XYL vs CFX Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CFX's competition here
XYL vs SHPW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SHPW's competition here
XYL vs EPAC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while EPAC trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check EPAC's competition here
XYL vs AMSC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while AMSC trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check AMSC's competition here
XYL vs BW-PA Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BW-PA trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BW-PA's competition here
XYL vs CYD Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CYD trades at $44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CYD's competition here
XYL vs BW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BW trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -65.55. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BW's competition here
XYL vs TNC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while TNC trades at $91.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check TNC's competition here
XYL vs GHM Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GHM trades at $121.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 86.87. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GHM's competition here
XYL vs CIR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CIR's competition here
XYL vs BLDP Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BLDP trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BLDP's competition here
XYL vs PSIX Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 875.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PSIX trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PSIX's competition here
XYL vs KRNT Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 744.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while KRNT trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check KRNT's competition here
XYL vs EROC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EROC has a market cap of 663.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while EROC trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas EROC's P/E ratio is 137.80. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EROC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to EROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check EROC's competition here
XYL vs PKOH Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PKOH trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PKOH's competition here
XYL vs MTW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MTW trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MTW's competition here
XYL vs LXFR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 501.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while LXFR trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check LXFR's competition here
XYL vs XE Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while XE trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -91.41. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check XE's competition here
XYL vs SERV Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SERV trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SERV's competition here
XYL vs RR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while RR trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check RR's competition here
XYL vs TWIN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 348.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while TWIN trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 73.30. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check TWIN's competition here
XYL vs BGRY Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BGRY's competition here
XYL vs VELO Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while VELO trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check VELO's competition here
XYL vs OFLX Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while OFLX trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check OFLX's competition here
XYL vs HUHU Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 248.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HUHU trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -194.42. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HUHU's competition here
XYL vs SHMD Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SHMD trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SHMD's competition here
XYL vs GENC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GENC trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GENC's competition here
XYL vs TAYD Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while TAYD trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check TAYD's competition here
XYL vs KULR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while KULR trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check KULR's competition here
XYL vs HURC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HURC trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HURC's competition here
XYL vs NPWR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while NPWR trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check NPWR's competition here
XYL vs BWEN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BWEN trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -72.33. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BWEN's competition here
XYL vs SHMDW Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SHMDW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SHMDW's competition here
XYL vs PYR Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check PYR's competition here
XYL vs HDRN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HDRN trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HDRN's competition here
XYL vs MCRP Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while MCRP trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check MCRP's competition here
XYL vs XCH Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while XCH trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check XCH's competition here
XYL vs CVV Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CVV trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CVV's competition here
XYL vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while SCAG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check SCAG's competition here
XYL vs LASE Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while LASE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check LASE's competition here
XYL vs BURU Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while BURU trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check BURU's competition here
XYL vs GTEC Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while GTEC trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check GTEC's competition here
XYL vs HCAI Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while HCAI trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check HCAI's competition here
XYL vs CGRN Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check CGRN's competition here
XYL vs JCSE Comparison June 2026
XYL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XYL stands at 27.7B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XYL is priced at $116.45, while JCSE trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XYL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.68, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, XYL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XYL is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XYL.Check JCSE's competition here