Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PH trades at $1,069.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PH's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $478.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check TT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $163.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check EMR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $637.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CMI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $292.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ITW's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $131.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PCAR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $63.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CARR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $451.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ROK's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while P trades at $111.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas P's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check P's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $84.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check IR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $121.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check XYL's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $73.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check OTIS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $208.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check DOV's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $41.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SYM's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $28.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1412.00. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check INIO's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $216.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ITT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $240.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check IEX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $311.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check NDSN's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $31.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 177.08. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MAIR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $420.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check LII's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $82.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GGG's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $221.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GNRC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $386.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check WTS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $222.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $172.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check RRX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $96.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check DCI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $199.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MOD's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $65.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PNR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while FLS trades at $80.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check FLS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GTLS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while OSK trades at $155.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check OSK's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $62.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check AOS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $51.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ZWS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $68.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check TEX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $341.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check NPO's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $27.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GTES's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MIDDV's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $85.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 58.38. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check AAON's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check AEBIV's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $118.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check JBTM's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $118.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MIDD's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $86.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ESAB's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ALH's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CSWI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $107.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check FELE's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check VNT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $26.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MWA's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check AIMC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $330.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SXI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check JBT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $334.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check KAI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $134.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check BMI's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MIR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CXT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $80.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check HLIO's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $81.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GRC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CFX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SHPW's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $165.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ALG's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ATS's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $37.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check EPAC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check BW-PA's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CYD trades at $46.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CYD's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MFPVV's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check BW's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $113.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 78.51. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GHM's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check TNC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CIR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 992.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check KODK's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 992.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $43.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check ASTE's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 980.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $42.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PSIX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check KRNT's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 723.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $20.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check MTW's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 711M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $49.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PKOH's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check HY's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check CMCO's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check LXFR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1176.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check VELO's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 446.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -61.22. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check XE's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SERV's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 74.48. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check TWIN's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SHMD's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check BGRY's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check RR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $30.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check OFLX's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $18.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check GENC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SHMDW trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SHMDW's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check TAYD's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check NPWR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $22.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check HURC's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check KULR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while HDRN trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check HDRN's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while HUHU trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -99.80. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check HUHU's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while BWEN trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -90.67. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check BWEN's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while SOTK trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check SOTK's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check PYR's competition here

Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HI stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HI is priced at $31.98 on the NYSE, while LASE trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HI currently has a P/E ratio of 65.27, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HI is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HI.Check LASE's competition here