Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ZWS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ZWS
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | $47.74 | -0.77% | 8B | 42.62 | $1.12 | +0.84% |
| VLTO | $89.50 | -0.13% | 22.2B | 23.80 | $3.76 | +0.54% |
| FSS | $115.04 | +0.25% | 7B | 28.71 | $4.01 | +0.49% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $63.20 | -0.49% | 5.2B | 25.28 | $2.50 | +0.34% |
| CECO | $64.24 | -1.20% | 2.3B | 46.88 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $5.94 | +8.99% | 1.1B | -4.91 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $5.58 | -10.00% | 766.1M | -8.96 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $11.11 | +0.45% | 588.5M | 26.45 | $0.42 | N/A |
| CECE | $11.65 | +2.19% | 401M | 58.25 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZWS vs VLTO Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while VLTO trades at $89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check VLTO's competition here
ZWS vs FSS Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while FSS trades at $115.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FSS's competition here
ZWS vs AQUA Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AQUA's competition here
ZWS vs ATMU Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while ATMU trades at $63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ATMU's competition here
ZWS vs CECO Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while CECO trades at $64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 46.88. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECO's competition here
ZWS vs PCT Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while PCT trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCT's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTU Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 766.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while PCTTU trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTU's competition here
ZWS vs ERII Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 588.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while ERII trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ERII's competition here
ZWS vs CECE Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECE's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTW Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while PCTTW trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTW's competition here
ZWS vs ADES Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADES's competition here
ZWS vs ARQ Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while ARQ trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ARQ's competition here
ZWS vs ZONE Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while ZONE trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ZONE's competition here
ZWS vs SCWO Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while SCWO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SCWO's competition here
ZWS vs BCHT Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while BCHT trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCHT's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BCHT's competition here
ZWS vs FTEK Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while FTEK trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FTEK's competition here
ZWS vs BHTG Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BHTG's competition here
ZWS vs CLIR Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while CLIR trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLIR's competition here
ZWS vs LIQT Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while LIQT trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check LIQT's competition here
ZWS vs TOMZ Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while TOMZ trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check TOMZ's competition here
ZWS vs CLWT Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while CLWT trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLWT's competition here
ZWS vs DEVS Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while DEVS trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check DEVS's competition here
ZWS vs MKUL Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check MKUL's competition here
ZWS vs RAINW Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check RAINW's competition here
ZWS vs SPECW Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPECW's competition here
ZWS vs SPEC Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPEC's competition here
ZWS vs NEWA Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check NEWA's competition here
ZWS vs AERC Comparison April 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $47.74, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.62, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AERC's competition here