Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | $50.20 | +4.02% | 8.4B | 31.00 | $1.62 | +0.84% |
| VLTO | $86.32 | +2.03% | 21.2B | 21.41 | $4.03 | +0.55% |
| FSS | $121.68 | +2.95% | 7.4B | 26.18 | $4.65 | +0.48% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $50.69 | +1.08% | 4.1B | 19.89 | $2.55 | +0.43% |
| CECO | $95.40 | -1.31% | 3.4B | 251.05 | $0.38 | N/A |
| PCT | $8.00 | -3.50% | 1.6B | -5.63 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $10.89 | +11.35% | 1.5B | -17.48 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $2.71 | -9.06% | 493.4M | -2.09 | -$1.31 | N/A |
| ADUR | $14.05 | -1.47% | 475.4M | -31.93 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZWS vs VLTO Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while VLTO trades at $86.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check VLTO's competition here
ZWS vs FSS Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while FSS trades at $121.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FSS's competition here
ZWS vs AQUA Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AQUA's competition here
ZWS vs ATMU Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ATMU trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ATMU's competition here
ZWS vs CECO Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while CECO trades at $95.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 251.05. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECO's competition here
ZWS vs PCT Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while PCT trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCT's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTU Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while PCTTU trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -17.48. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTU's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTW Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 493.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while PCTTW trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTW's competition here
ZWS vs ADUR Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ADUR trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -31.93. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADUR's competition here
ZWS vs ERII Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ERII trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ERII's competition here
ZWS vs CECE Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECE's competition here
ZWS vs ZONE Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ZONE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ZONE's competition here
ZWS vs ADES Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADES's competition here
ZWS vs ARQ Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while ARQ trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ARQ's competition here
ZWS vs FTEK Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while FTEK trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FTEK's competition here
ZWS vs BCHT Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while BCHT trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BCHT's competition here
ZWS vs BHTG Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BHTG's competition here
ZWS vs SCWO Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while SCWO trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SCWO's competition here
ZWS vs CLIR Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while CLIR trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLIR's competition here
ZWS vs RAINW Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while RAINW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check RAINW's competition here
ZWS vs TOMZ Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while TOMZ trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check TOMZ's competition here
ZWS vs CLWT Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while CLWT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLWT's competition here
ZWS vs LIQT Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while LIQT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check LIQT's competition here
ZWS vs MKUL Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check MKUL's competition here
ZWS vs DEVS Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 749.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while DEVS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check DEVS's competition here
ZWS vs SPECW Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPECW's competition here
ZWS vs AERC Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AERC's competition here
ZWS vs NEWA Comparison June 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $50.20, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check NEWA's competition here