Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | $48.39 | +1.60% | 8.1B | 29.87 | $1.62 | +0.88% |
| VLTO | $94.19 | +3.51% | 23.1B | 23.37 | $4.03 | +0.55% |
| FSS | $119.57 | +1.52% | 7.3B | 25.71 | $4.65 | +0.49% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $52.46 | +1.82% | 4.3B | 18.80 | $2.79 | +0.43% |
| CECO | $80.30 | -0.25% | 2.9B | 69.22 | $1.16 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $10.75 | -2.27% | 1.5B | -8.29 | -$1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $2.00 | N/A | 1.4B | -1.53 | -$1.31 | N/A |
| PCT | $6.09 | -13.57% | 1.2B | -4.29 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| ERII | $8.70 | +0.93% | 448.4M | 17.76 | $0.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZWS vs VLTO Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while VLTO trades at $94.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check VLTO's competition here
ZWS vs FSS Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while FSS trades at $119.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FSS's competition here
ZWS vs AQUA Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AQUA's competition here
ZWS vs ATMU Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ATMU trades at $52.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ATMU's competition here
ZWS vs CECO Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while CECO trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 69.22. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECO's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTU Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while PCTTU trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTU's competition here
ZWS vs PCTTW Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while PCTTW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCTTW's competition here
ZWS vs PCT Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while PCT trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCT's ROE of -4.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check PCT's competition here
ZWS vs ERII Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 448.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ERII trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ERII's competition here
ZWS vs ADUR Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ADUR trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -30.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADUR's competition here
ZWS vs CECE Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CECE's competition here
ZWS vs ZONE Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ZONE trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ZONE's competition here
ZWS vs ADES Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ADES's competition here
ZWS vs ARQ Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while ARQ trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check ARQ's competition here
ZWS vs FTEK Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while FTEK trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check FTEK's competition here
ZWS vs BCHT Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BCHT has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while BCHT trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas BCHT's P/E ratio is -43.50. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCHT's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BCHT's competition here
ZWS vs BHTG Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check BHTG's competition here
ZWS vs CLIR Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while CLIR trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLIR's competition here
ZWS vs TOMZ Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while TOMZ trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check TOMZ's competition here
ZWS vs RAINW Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check RAINW's competition here
ZWS vs CLWT Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while CLWT trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check CLWT's competition here
ZWS vs LIQT Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while LIQT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check LIQT's competition here
ZWS vs MKUL Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check MKUL's competition here
ZWS vs DEVS Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 749.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while DEVS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check DEVS's competition here
ZWS vs SPECW Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check SPECW's competition here
ZWS vs NEWA Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check NEWA's competition here
ZWS vs AERC Comparison July 2026
ZWS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZWS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZWS is priced at $48.39, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZWS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.87, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZWS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZWS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZWS.Check AERC's competition here