Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TWIN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TWIN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWIN | $22.85 | -0.52% | 331.2M | 9.57 | $2.38 | +0.73% |
| GEV | $774.11 | +0.47% | 205B | 20.32 | $38.11 | +0.26% |
| PH | $917.79 | +2.86% | 115.7B | 28.39 | $32.31 | +0.83% |
| EMR | $162.35 | -0.16% | 90.5B | 25.64 | $6.33 | +1.37% |
| TT | $401.76 | +2.38% | 87.9B | 27.40 | $14.66 | +1.02% |
| ITW | $280.95 | -1.56% | 79.9B | 26.09 | $10.77 | +2.33% |
| HON | $220.05 | +1.98% | 69.8B | 14.21 | $15.49 | +2.02% |
| CMI | $450.07 | +0.33% | 62B | 18.55 | $24.28 | +1.81% |
| PCAR | $101.98 | -2.41% | 53.7B | 19.42 | $5.25 | +2.70% |
| CARR | $52.38 | -1.56% | 42.8B | 20.94 | $2.50 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE: GEV)
TWIN vs GEV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 205B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GEV trades at $774.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GEV's competition here
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH)
TWIN vs PH Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PH trades at $917.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PH's competition here
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR)
TWIN vs EMR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while EMR trades at $162.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EMR's competition here
Trane Technologies plc (NYSE: TT)
TWIN vs TT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while TT trades at $401.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TT's competition here
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE: ITW)
TWIN vs ITW Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ITW trades at $280.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITW's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON)
TWIN vs HON Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while HON trades at $220.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HON's competition here
Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI)
TWIN vs CMI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CMI trades at $450.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMI's competition here
PACCAR Inc (NASDAQ: PCAR)
TWIN vs PCAR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PCAR trades at $101.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PCAR's competition here
Carrier Global Corporation (NYSE: CARR)
TWIN vs CARR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CARR trades at $52.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CARR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CARR's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
TWIN vs ROK Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ROK trades at $375.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ROK's competition here
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR)
TWIN vs IR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while IR trades at $82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IR's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: OTIS)
TWIN vs OTIS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while OTIS trades at $78.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OTIS's competition here
Dover Corporation (NYSE: DOV)
TWIN vs DOV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while DOV trades at $203.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DOV's competition here
Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL)
TWIN vs XYL Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while XYL trades at $97.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XYL's competition here
Symbotic Inc. (NASDAQ: SYM)
TWIN vs SYM Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SYM trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SYM's competition here
ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT)
TWIN vs ITT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ITT trades at $205.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITT's competition here
Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ: NDSN)
TWIN vs NDSN Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while NDSN trades at $309.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NDSN's competition here
IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX)
TWIN vs IEX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while IEX trades at $226.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IEX's competition here
Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII)
TWIN vs LII Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $341.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LII's competition here
Crane Company (NYSE: CR)
TWIN vs CR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CR trades at $201.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CR's competition here
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: WTS)
TWIN vs WTS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while WTS trades at $346.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check WTS's competition here
Madison Air Solutions Corporation (NYSE: MAIR)
TWIN vs MAIR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MAIR trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 46.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MAIR's competition here
Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE: RRX)
TWIN vs RRX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while RRX trades at $169.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RRX's competition here
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG)
TWIN vs GGG Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GGG trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GGG's competition here
Pentair plc (NYSE: PNR)
TWIN vs PNR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PNR trades at $68.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PNR's competition here
Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC)
TWIN vs GNRC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GNRC trades at $176.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GNRC's competition here
INNIO N.V. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: INIO)
TWIN vs INIO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while INIO trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 105.73. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check INIO's competition here
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS)
TWIN vs FLS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while FLS trades at $80.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FLS's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS)
TWIN vs GTLS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS's competition here
Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE: DCI)
TWIN vs DCI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while DCI trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DCI's competition here
A. O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS)
TWIN vs AOS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while AOS trades at $64.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AOS's competition here
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (NYSE: ZWS)
TWIN vs ZWS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ZWS trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ZWS's competition here
Middleby Corp. (NASDAQ: MIDDV)
TWIN vs MIDDV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDDV's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBTM)
TWIN vs JBTM Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while JBTM trades at $128.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBTM's competition here
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG Common Stock When-Issued (NASDAQ: AEBIV)
TWIN vs AEBIV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AEBIV's competition here
Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX)
TWIN vs TEX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while TEX trades at $54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TEX's competition here
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD)
TWIN vs MIDD Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MIDD trades at $136.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDD's competition here
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (NYSE: GTES)
TWIN vs GTES Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GTES trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTES's competition here
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPO)
TWIN vs NPO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while NPO trades at $258.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPO's competition here
ESAB Corporation (NYSE: ESAB)
TWIN vs ESAB Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ESAB trades at $82.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ESAB's competition here
Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD)
TWIN vs MOD Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MOD trades at $96.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MOD's competition here
CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSWI)
TWIN vs CSWI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CSWI's competition here
AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON)
TWIN vs AAON Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $57.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AAON's competition here
Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI)
TWIN vs BMI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BMI trades at $158.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BMI's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
TWIN vs ALH Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALH's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR)
TWIN vs MIR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MIR trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR's competition here
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE)
TWIN vs FELE Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while FELE trades at $94.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FELE's competition here
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. (NASDAQ: AIMC)
TWIN vs AIMC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AIMC's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBT)
TWIN vs JBT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBT's competition here
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (NYSE: MWA)
TWIN vs MWA Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MWA trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MWA's competition here
Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI)
TWIN vs KAI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while KAI trades at $292.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KAI's competition here
Crane NXT, Co. (NYSE: CXT)
TWIN vs CXT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CXT trades at $57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CXT's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS-PB)
TWIN vs GTLS-PB Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI)
TWIN vs SXI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SXI trades at $228.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SXI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR-WT)
TWIN vs MIR-WT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR-WT's competition here
Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI)
TWIN vs HI Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HI's competition here
Colfax Corporation (NYSE: CFX)
TWIN vs CFX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CFX's competition here
Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW)
TWIN vs SHPW Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHPW's competition here
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE: EPAC)
TWIN vs EPAC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while EPAC trades at $38.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EPAC's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFP)
TWIN vs MFP Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MFP trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 117.74. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MFP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MFP's competition here
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE: GRC)
TWIN vs GRC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GRC trades at $67.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GRC's competition here
ATS Corporation (NYSE: ATS)
TWIN vs ATS Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ATS trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ATS's competition here
Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG)
TWIN vs ALG Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ALG trades at $133.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALG's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFPVV)
TWIN vs MFPVV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MFPVV's competition here
Helios Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: HLIO)
TWIN vs HLIO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while HLIO trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HLIO's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW-PA)
TWIN vs BW-PA Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BW-PA trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW-PA's competition here
Tennant Company (NYSE: TNC)
TWIN vs TNC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while TNC trades at $71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TNC's competition here
Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM)
TWIN vs GHM Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 914.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GHM trades at $78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 54.13. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GHM's competition here
Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX)
TWIN vs PSIX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 902.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PSIX trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PSIX's competition here
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (NYSE: PLOW)
TWIN vs PLOW Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 838.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PLOW trades at $36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PLOW's competition here
Astec Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTE)
TWIN vs ASTE Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while ASTE trades at $35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ASTE's competition here
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW)
TWIN vs MTW Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 806.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while MTW trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MTW's competition here
Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK)
TWIN vs KODK Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while KODK trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KODK's competition here
Kornit Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: KRNT)
TWIN vs KRNT Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 724M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while KRNT trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KRNT's competition here
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: PKOH)
TWIN vs PKOH Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 632.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PKOH trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PKOH's competition here
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCO)
TWIN vs CMCO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while CMCO trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMCO's competition here
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (NYSE: HY)
TWIN vs HY Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 509M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while HY trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HY's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW)
TWIN vs BW Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BW trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW's competition here
Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR)
TWIN vs LXFR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 463.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while LXFR trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LXFR's competition here
Berkshire Grey, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGRY)
TWIN vs BGRY Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BGRY's competition here
Serve Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: SERV)
TWIN vs SERV Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SERV trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SERV's competition here
Gencor Industries, Inc. (AMEX: GENC)
TWIN vs GENC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while GENC trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GENC's competition here
Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFLX)
TWIN vs OFLX Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 242.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while OFLX trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OFLX's competition here
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPIH)
TWIN vs PPIH Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PPIH trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PPIH's competition here
X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: XE)
TWIN vs XE Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while XE trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XE's competition here
BNB Standard Corp. (NASDAQ: BNC)
TWIN vs BNC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BNC trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BNC's competition here
Taylor Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAYD)
TWIN vs TAYD Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while TAYD trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TAYD's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NASDAQ: VELO)
TWIN vs VELO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while VELO trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check VELO's competition here
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (NASDAQ: RR)
TWIN vs RR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while RR trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RR's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: SHMD)
TWIN vs SHMD Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SHMD trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHMD's competition here
Hurco Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HURC)
TWIN vs HURC Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while HURC trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HURC's competition here
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO)
TWIN vs NANO Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, NANO has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while NANO trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas NANO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NANO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to NANO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NANO's competition here
Deep Fission, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISN)
TWIN vs FISN Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while FISN trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FISN's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (NYSE: BWNB)
TWIN vs BWNB Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while BWNB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BWNB's competition here
Turbogen Ltd (NASDAQ: TRBG)
TWIN vs TRBG Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, TRBG has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while TRBG trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas TRBG's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to TRBG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TRBG's competition here
NET Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR)
TWIN vs NPWR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while NPWR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPWR's competition here
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (AMEX: KULR)
TWIN vs KULR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while KULR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KULR's competition here
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (NASDAQ: PYR)
TWIN vs PYR Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PYR's competition here
Sono-Tek Corporation (NASDAQ: SOTK)
TWIN vs SOTK Comparison November 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 331.2M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $22.85 on the NASDAQ, while SOTK trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.57, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SOTK's competition here