Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TWIN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TWIN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWIN | $23.12 | -1.03% | 333.5M | 70.06 | $0.33 | +0.74% |
| GEV | $911.93 | -4.39% | 242.7B | 26.08 | $34.94 | +0.19% |
| PH | $995.02 | -1.60% | 125.4B | 30.79 | $32.31 | +0.74% |
| TT | $448.96 | -1.18% | 98.8B | 33.90 | $13.25 | +0.89% |
| EMR | $155.18 | -1.60% | 86.9B | 24.52 | $6.33 | +1.43% |
| ITW | $280.10 | -1.89% | 81B | 26.15 | $10.77 | +2.30% |
| CMI | $564.85 | -1.57% | 77.9B | 23.26 | $24.28 | +1.45% |
| PCAR | $125.34 | -0.95% | 66B | 26.67 | $4.70 | +2.21% |
| CARR | $58.79 | -0.08% | 48.5B | 23.52 | $2.50 | +1.61% |
| ROK | $430.86 | -0.49% | 47.9B | 33.45 | $12.88 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE: GEV)
TWIN vs GEV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GEV trades at $911.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GEV's competition here
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH)
TWIN vs PH Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PH trades at $995.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PH's competition here
Trane Technologies plc (NYSE: TT)
TWIN vs TT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while TT trades at $448.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TT's competition here
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR)
TWIN vs EMR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while EMR trades at $155.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EMR's competition here
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE: ITW)
TWIN vs ITW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ITW trades at $280.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITW's competition here
Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI)
TWIN vs CMI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CMI trades at $564.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMI's competition here
PACCAR Inc (NASDAQ: PCAR)
TWIN vs PCAR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PCAR trades at $125.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PCAR's competition here
Carrier Global Corporation (NYSE: CARR)
TWIN vs CARR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CARR trades at $58.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CARR's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
TWIN vs ROK Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ROK trades at $430.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ROK's competition here
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR)
TWIN vs IR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while IR trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IR's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: OTIS)
TWIN vs OTIS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while OTIS trades at $71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OTIS's competition here
Dover Corporation (NYSE: DOV)
TWIN vs DOV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while DOV trades at $198.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DOV's competition here
Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL)
TWIN vs XYL Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while XYL trades at $111.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XYL's competition here
Symbotic Inc. (NASDAQ: SYM)
TWIN vs SYM Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SYM trades at $39.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 48.03. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SYM's competition here
ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT)
TWIN vs ITT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ITT trades at $202.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITT's competition here
Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ: NDSN)
TWIN vs NDSN Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while NDSN trades at $324.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NDSN's competition here
IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX)
TWIN vs IEX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while IEX trades at $230.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IEX's competition here
INNIO N.V. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: INIO)
TWIN vs INIO Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while INIO trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1041.50. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check INIO's competition here
Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII)
TWIN vs LII Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $393.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LII's competition here
Madison Air Solutions Corporation (NYSE: MAIR)
TWIN vs MAIR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MAIR trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 146.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MAIR's competition here
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG)
TWIN vs GGG Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GGG trades at $79.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GGG's competition here
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: WTS)
TWIN vs WTS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while WTS trades at $366.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check WTS's competition here
Crane Company (NYSE: CR)
TWIN vs CR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CR trades at $207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CR's competition here
Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC)
TWIN vs GNRC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GNRC trades at $183.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GNRC's competition here
Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE: DCI)
TWIN vs DCI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while DCI trades at $91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DCI's competition here
Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE: RRX)
TWIN vs RRX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while RRX trades at $157.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RRX's competition here
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS)
TWIN vs FLS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while FLS trades at $80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FLS's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS)
TWIN vs GTLS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS's competition here
Pentair plc (NYSE: PNR)
TWIN vs PNR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PNR trades at $61.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PNR's competition here
Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD)
TWIN vs MOD Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MOD trades at $177.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MOD's competition here
A. O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS)
TWIN vs AOS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while AOS trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AOS's competition here
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (NYSE: ZWS)
TWIN vs ZWS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ZWS trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ZWS's competition here
Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX)
TWIN vs TEX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while TEX trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TEX's competition here
Middleby Corp. (NASDAQ: MIDDV)
TWIN vs MIDDV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDDV's competition here
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (NYSE: GTES)
TWIN vs GTES Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GTES trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTES's competition here
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG Common Stock When-Issued (NASDAQ: AEBIV)
TWIN vs AEBIV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AEBIV's competition here
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPO)
TWIN vs NPO Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while NPO trades at $298.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPO's competition here
AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON)
TWIN vs AAON Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $75.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AAON's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBTM)
TWIN vs JBTM Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while JBTM trades at $118.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBTM's competition here
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD)
TWIN vs MIDD Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MIDD trades at $112.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDD's competition here
CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSWI)
TWIN vs CSWI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CSWI's competition here
ESAB Corporation (NYSE: ESAB)
TWIN vs ESAB Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ESAB trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ESAB's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
TWIN vs ALH Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALH's competition here
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE)
TWIN vs FELE Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while FELE trades at $100.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FELE's competition here
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. (NASDAQ: AIMC)
TWIN vs AIMC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AIMC's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBT)
TWIN vs JBT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBT's competition here
Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI)
TWIN vs BMI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BMI trades at $135.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BMI's competition here
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (NYSE: MWA)
TWIN vs MWA Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MWA trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MWA's competition here
Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI)
TWIN vs SXI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SXI trades at $298.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SXI's competition here
Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI)
TWIN vs KAI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while KAI trades at $302.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KAI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR)
TWIN vs MIR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MIR trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS-PB)
TWIN vs GTLS-PB Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
Crane NXT, Co. (NYSE: CXT)
TWIN vs CXT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CXT trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CXT's competition here
Helios Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: HLIO)
TWIN vs HLIO Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HLIO trades at $73.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HLIO's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR-WT)
TWIN vs MIR-WT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR-WT's competition here
Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI)
TWIN vs HI Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HI's competition here
Colfax Corporation (NYSE: CFX)
TWIN vs CFX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CFX's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFP)
TWIN vs MFP Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MFP trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MFP's competition here
Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW)
TWIN vs SHPW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHPW's competition here
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE: GRC)
TWIN vs GRC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GRC trades at $76.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GRC's competition here
Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG)
TWIN vs ALG Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ALG trades at $165.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALG's competition here
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE: EPAC)
TWIN vs EPAC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while EPAC trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EPAC's competition here
ATS Corporation (NYSE: ATS)
TWIN vs ATS Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ATS trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ATS's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW-PA)
TWIN vs BW-PA Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BW-PA trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW-PA's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFPVV)
TWIN vs MFPVV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MFPVV's competition here
Tennant Company (NYSE: TNC)
TWIN vs TNC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while TNC trades at $69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TNC's competition here
CIRCOR International, Inc. (NYSE: CIR)
TWIN vs CIR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CIR's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW)
TWIN vs BW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BW trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (NYSE: BWNB)
TWIN vs BWNB Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BWNB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BWNB's competition here
Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM)
TWIN vs GHM Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GHM trades at $86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 59.88. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GHM's competition here
Astec Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTE)
TWIN vs ASTE Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 997.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while ASTE trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ASTE's competition here
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (NYSE: PLOW)
TWIN vs PLOW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 967.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PLOW trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PLOW's competition here
Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK)
TWIN vs KODK Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 883.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while KODK trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KODK's competition here
Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX)
TWIN vs PSIX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 836.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PSIX trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PSIX's competition here
Kornit Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: KRNT)
TWIN vs KRNT Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 774.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while KRNT trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KRNT's competition here
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW)
TWIN vs MTW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 703.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while MTW trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MTW's competition here
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: PKOH)
TWIN vs PKOH Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PKOH trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PKOH's competition here
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (NYSE: HY)
TWIN vs HY Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 605M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HY trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HY's competition here
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCO)
TWIN vs CMCO Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while CMCO trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMCO's competition here
Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR)
TWIN vs LXFR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while LXFR trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LXFR's competition here
Deep Fission, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISN)
TWIN vs FISN Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 395.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while FISN trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FISN's competition here
Serve Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: SERV)
TWIN vs SERV Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SERV trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SERV's competition here
X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: XE)
TWIN vs XE Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while XE trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -51.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XE's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NASDAQ: VELO)
TWIN vs VELO Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while VELO trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check VELO's competition here
Berkshire Grey, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGRY)
TWIN vs BGRY Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BGRY's competition here
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (NASDAQ: RR)
TWIN vs RR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while RR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is similarly volatile compared to RR. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RR's competition here
Gencor Industries, Inc. (AMEX: GENC)
TWIN vs GENC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while GENC trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GENC's competition here
Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFLX)
TWIN vs OFLX Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while OFLX trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OFLX's competition here
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPIH)
TWIN vs PPIH Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while PPIH trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PPIH's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: SHMD)
TWIN vs SHMD Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SHMD trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHMD's competition here
Taylor Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAYD)
TWIN vs TAYD Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while TAYD trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TAYD's competition here
NET Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR)
TWIN vs NPWR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while NPWR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPWR's competition here
Hurco Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HURC)
TWIN vs HURC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HURC trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HURC's competition here
Hadron Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: HDRN)
TWIN vs HDRN Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 140.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HDRN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HDRN's competition here
CEA Industries Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: BNC)
TWIN vs BNC Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BNC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BNC's competition here
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (AMEX: KULR)
TWIN vs KULR Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while KULR trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KULR's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Warrants (NASDAQ: SHMDW)
TWIN vs SHMDW Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while SHMDW trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHMDW's competition here
HUHUTECH International Group Inc. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HUHU)
TWIN vs HUHU Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while HUHU trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -80.48. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HUHU's competition here
Broadwind, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWEN)
TWIN vs BWEN Comparison September 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 333.5M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $23.12 on the NASDAQ, while BWEN trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 70.06, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -72.83. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BWEN's competition here