Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TWIN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TWIN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWIN | $24.58 | +1.74% | 354.5M | 74.48 | $0.33 | +0.65% |
| PH | $1,069.52 | +0.77% | 134.8B | 33.10 | $32.31 | +0.69% |
| TT | $478.55 | -1.12% | 105.3B | 36.11 | $13.25 | +0.83% |
| EMR | $163.80 | -0.35% | 91.8B | 25.88 | $6.33 | +1.33% |
| CMI | $637.85 | +0.48% | 87.3B | 26.06 | $24.28 | +1.25% |
| ITW | $292.51 | -0.22% | 84.2B | 27.16 | $10.77 | +2.19% |
| PCAR | $131.06 | -1.11% | 69B | 27.89 | $4.70 | +2.10% |
| CARR | $63.08 | -0.85% | 52B | 25.24 | $2.50 | +1.49% |
| ROK | $451.39 | +0.98% | 50.2B | 35.05 | $12.88 | +1.21% |
| P | $111.40 | +1.85% | 37B | 51.33 | $2.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH)
TWIN vs PH Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PH trades at $1,069.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PH's competition here
Trane Technologies plc (NYSE: TT)
TWIN vs TT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while TT trades at $478.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TT's competition here
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR)
TWIN vs EMR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while EMR trades at $163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EMR's competition here
Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI)
TWIN vs CMI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CMI trades at $637.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMI's competition here
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE: ITW)
TWIN vs ITW Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ITW trades at $292.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITW's competition here
PACCAR Inc (NASDAQ: PCAR)
TWIN vs PCAR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PCAR trades at $131.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PCAR's competition here
Carrier Global Corporation (NYSE: CARR)
TWIN vs CARR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CARR trades at $63.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CARR's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
TWIN vs ROK Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ROK trades at $451.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ROK's competition here
Everpure, Inc. (NYSE: P)
TWIN vs P Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, P has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while P trades at $111.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas P's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check P's competition here
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR)
TWIN vs IR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while IR trades at $84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IR's competition here
Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL)
TWIN vs XYL Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while XYL trades at $121.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XYL's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: OTIS)
TWIN vs OTIS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while OTIS trades at $73.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OTIS's competition here
Dover Corporation (NYSE: DOV)
TWIN vs DOV Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while DOV trades at $208.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DOV's competition here
Symbotic Inc. (NASDAQ: SYM)
TWIN vs SYM Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SYM trades at $41.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SYM's competition here
INNIO N.V. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: INIO)
TWIN vs INIO Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while INIO trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1412.00. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check INIO's competition here
ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT)
TWIN vs ITT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ITT trades at $216.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ITT's competition here
IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX)
TWIN vs IEX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while IEX trades at $240.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check IEX's competition here
Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ: NDSN)
TWIN vs NDSN Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while NDSN trades at $311.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NDSN's competition here
Madison Air Solutions Corporation (NYSE: MAIR)
TWIN vs MAIR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MAIR trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 177.08. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MAIR's competition here
Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII)
TWIN vs LII Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $420.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LII's competition here
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG)
TWIN vs GGG Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GGG trades at $82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GGG's competition here
Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC)
TWIN vs GNRC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GNRC trades at $221.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GNRC's competition here
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: WTS)
TWIN vs WTS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while WTS trades at $386.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check WTS's competition here
Crane Company (NYSE: CR)
TWIN vs CR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CR trades at $222.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CR's competition here
Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE: RRX)
TWIN vs RRX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while RRX trades at $172.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RRX's competition here
Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE: DCI)
TWIN vs DCI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while DCI trades at $96.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check DCI's competition here
Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD)
TWIN vs MOD Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MOD trades at $199.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MOD's competition here
Pentair plc (NYSE: PNR)
TWIN vs PNR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PNR trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PNR's competition here
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS)
TWIN vs FLS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while FLS trades at $80.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FLS's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS)
TWIN vs GTLS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS's competition here
Oshkosh Corp (NYSE: OSK)
TWIN vs OSK Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while OSK trades at $155.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OSK's competition here
A. O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS)
TWIN vs AOS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while AOS trades at $62.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AOS's competition here
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (NYSE: ZWS)
TWIN vs ZWS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ZWS trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ZWS's competition here
Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX)
TWIN vs TEX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while TEX trades at $68.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is similarly volatile compared to TEX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TEX's competition here
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPO)
TWIN vs NPO Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while NPO trades at $341.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPO's competition here
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (NYSE: GTES)
TWIN vs GTES Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GTES trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTES's competition here
Middleby Corp. (NASDAQ: MIDDV)
TWIN vs MIDDV Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDDV's competition here
AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON)
TWIN vs AAON Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 58.38. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AAON's competition here
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG Common Stock When-Issued (NASDAQ: AEBIV)
TWIN vs AEBIV Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AEBIV's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBTM)
TWIN vs JBTM Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while JBTM trades at $118.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBTM's competition here
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD)
TWIN vs MIDD Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MIDD trades at $118.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIDD's competition here
ESAB Corporation (NYSE: ESAB)
TWIN vs ESAB Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ESAB trades at $86.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ESAB's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
TWIN vs ALH Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALH's competition here
CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSWI)
TWIN vs CSWI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CSWI's competition here
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE)
TWIN vs FELE Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while FELE trades at $107.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check FELE's competition here
Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT)
TWIN vs VNT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while VNT trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check VNT's competition here
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (NYSE: MWA)
TWIN vs MWA Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MWA trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MWA's competition here
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. (NASDAQ: AIMC)
TWIN vs AIMC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check AIMC's competition here
Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI)
TWIN vs SXI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SXI trades at $330.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SXI's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBT)
TWIN vs JBT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check JBT's competition here
Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI)
TWIN vs KAI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while KAI trades at $334.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KAI's competition here
Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI)
TWIN vs BMI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while BMI trades at $134.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BMI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR)
TWIN vs MIR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MIR trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS-PB)
TWIN vs GTLS-PB Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
Crane NXT, Co. (NYSE: CXT)
TWIN vs CXT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CXT trades at $51.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CXT's competition here
Helios Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: HLIO)
TWIN vs HLIO Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HLIO trades at $80.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HLIO's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR-WT)
TWIN vs MIR-WT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MIR-WT's competition here
Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI)
TWIN vs HI Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HI's competition here
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE: GRC)
TWIN vs GRC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GRC trades at $81.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GRC's competition here
Colfax Corporation (NYSE: CFX)
TWIN vs CFX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CFX's competition here
Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW)
TWIN vs SHPW Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHPW's competition here
Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG)
TWIN vs ALG Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ALG trades at $165.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ALG's competition here
ATS Corporation (NYSE: ATS)
TWIN vs ATS Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ATS trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ATS's competition here
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE: EPAC)
TWIN vs EPAC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while EPAC trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check EPAC's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW-PA)
TWIN vs BW-PA Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while BW-PA trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW-PA's competition here
China Yuchai International Limited (NYSE: CYD)
TWIN vs CYD Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CYD trades at $46.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CYD's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFPVV)
TWIN vs MFPVV Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MFPVV's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW)
TWIN vs BW Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while BW trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BW's competition here
Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM)
TWIN vs GHM Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GHM trades at $113.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 78.51. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GHM's competition here
Tennant Company (NYSE: TNC)
TWIN vs TNC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while TNC trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TNC's competition here
CIRCOR International, Inc. (NYSE: CIR)
TWIN vs CIR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CIR's competition here
Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK)
TWIN vs KODK Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 992.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while KODK trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KODK's competition here
Astec Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTE)
TWIN vs ASTE Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 992.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while ASTE trades at $43.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check ASTE's competition here
Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX)
TWIN vs PSIX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 980.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PSIX trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PSIX's competition here
Kornit Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: KRNT)
TWIN vs KRNT Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while KRNT trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KRNT's competition here
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW)
TWIN vs MTW Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 723.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while MTW trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check MTW's competition here
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: PKOH)
TWIN vs PKOH Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 711M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PKOH trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PKOH's competition here
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (NYSE: HY)
TWIN vs HY Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HY trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HY's competition here
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCO)
TWIN vs CMCO Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while CMCO trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check CMCO's competition here
Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR)
TWIN vs LXFR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while LXFR trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LXFR's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NASDAQ: VELO)
TWIN vs VELO Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while VELO trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1176.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check VELO's competition here
X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: XE)
TWIN vs XE Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 446.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while XE trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -61.22. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check XE's competition here
Serve Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: SERV)
TWIN vs SERV Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SERV trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SERV's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: SHMD)
TWIN vs SHMD Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SHMD trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHMD's competition here
Berkshire Grey, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGRY)
TWIN vs BGRY Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BGRY's competition here
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (NASDAQ: RR)
TWIN vs RR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while RR trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check RR's competition here
Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFLX)
TWIN vs OFLX Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while OFLX trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check OFLX's competition here
Gencor Industries, Inc. (AMEX: GENC)
TWIN vs GENC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while GENC trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check GENC's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Warrants (NASDAQ: SHMDW)
TWIN vs SHMDW Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SHMDW trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SHMDW's competition here
Taylor Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAYD)
TWIN vs TAYD Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while TAYD trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check TAYD's competition here
NET Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR)
TWIN vs NPWR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while NPWR trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check NPWR's competition here
Hurco Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HURC)
TWIN vs HURC Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HURC trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HURC's competition here
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (AMEX: KULR)
TWIN vs KULR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while KULR trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check KULR's competition here
Hadron Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: HDRN)
TWIN vs HDRN Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HDRN trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HDRN's competition here
HUHUTECH International Group Inc. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HUHU)
TWIN vs HUHU Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while HUHU trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -99.80. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check HUHU's competition here
Broadwind, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWEN)
TWIN vs BWEN Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while BWEN trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -90.67. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check BWEN's competition here
Sono-Tek Corporation (NASDAQ: SOTK)
TWIN vs SOTK Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while SOTK trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check SOTK's competition here
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (NASDAQ: PYR)
TWIN vs PYR Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check PYR's competition here
Laser Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: LASE)
TWIN vs LASE Comparison August 2026
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWIN stands at 354.5M. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWIN is priced at $24.58 on the NASDAQ, while LASE trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWIN currently has a P/E ratio of 74.48, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TWIN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWIN is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWIN.Check LASE's competition here