Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 250.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GEV trades at $940.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GEV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $429.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $149.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check EMR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $269.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ITW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $532.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CMI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $116.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PCAR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $415.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ROK's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $53.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CARR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $71.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check IR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $41.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SYM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $68.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check OTIS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $187.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check DOV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $107.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check XYL's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $204.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ITT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $311.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NDSN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $223.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check IEX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1057.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check INIO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $359.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check LII's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $76.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GGG's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $207.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GNRC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 133.39. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MAIR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $350.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check WTS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $197.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTLS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $188.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MOD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $86.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check DCI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $148.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check RRX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while FLS trades at $73.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FLS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $55.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PNR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $56.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AOS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $46.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ZWS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIDDV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $59.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TEX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTES's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AEBIV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $76.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AAON's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $292.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NPO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check JBTM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $112.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIDD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CSWI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ALH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $95.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FELE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AIMC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check JBT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $64.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ESAB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $132.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BMI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MWA's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $261.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SXI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $265.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KAI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CXT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $69.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HLIO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CFX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHPW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $166.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ALG's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $73.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GRC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MFP trades at $42.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MFP's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ATS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $35.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check EPAC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $22.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.04. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BW-PA's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MFPVV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $67.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TNC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BWNB trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BWNB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $45.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PSIX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $84.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 58.26. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GHM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 951.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ASTE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 937.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KODK's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PLOW trades at $39.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PLOW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 803.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $22.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MTW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 712.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KRNT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 663.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $46.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PKOH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 594.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $33.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HY's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 511M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while FISN trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FISN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 460.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check LXFR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CMCO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 392.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BURU trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BURU's ROE of +4.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BURU's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 358.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TWIN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 346.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $15.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -47.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check XE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SERV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BGRY's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check VELO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check RR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check OFLX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GENC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while PPIH trades at $30.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PPIH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 246.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BNC trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BNC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHMD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $60.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TAYD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NPWR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HUHU trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -116.53. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HUHU's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -21.53. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HURC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while HDRN trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HDRN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KULR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while SHMDW trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHMDW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 118.9B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $943.54 on the NYSE, while BWEN trades at $4.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 29.19, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -71.17. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BWEN's competition here