Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | $34.61 | -2.48% | 1.8B | 18.50 | $1.87 | +0.12% |
| PH | $953.21 | -0.54% | 120.2B | 31.01 | $30.73 | +0.78% |
| TT | $469.98 | -1.06% | 103.9B | 35.47 | $13.25 | +0.85% |
| CMI | $648.48 | +0.10% | 89.5B | 27.04 | $23.98 | +1.24% |
| ITW | $276.05 | +1.71% | 81.4B | 26.27 | $10.77 | +2.33% |
| EMR | $139.54 | +0.33% | 78.2B | 22.73 | $6.14 | +1.57% |
| PCAR | $126.20 | -0.37% | 66.4B | 26.85 | $4.70 | +2.18% |
| CARR | $68.69 | -0.94% | 57.1B | 27.48 | $2.50 | +1.35% |
| ROK | $461.85 | -1.46% | 51.4B | 37.82 | $12.21 | +1.19% |
| IR | $82.24 | +3.92% | 33.2B | 25.01 | $3.39 | +0.10% |
Stock Comparison
EPAC vs PH Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PH trades at $953.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PH's competition here
EPAC vs TT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while TT trades at $469.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TT's competition here
EPAC vs CMI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CMI trades at $648.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CMI's competition here
EPAC vs ITW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while ITW trades at $276.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITW's competition here
EPAC vs EMR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while EMR trades at $139.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check EMR's competition here
EPAC vs PCAR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PCAR trades at $126.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PCAR's competition here
EPAC vs CARR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CARR trades at $68.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CARR's competition here
EPAC vs ROK Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while ROK trades at $461.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ROK's competition here
EPAC vs IR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while IR trades at $82.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IR's competition here
EPAC vs XYL Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while XYL trades at $122.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XYL's competition here
EPAC vs DOV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while DOV trades at $214.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DOV's competition here
EPAC vs OTIS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while OTIS trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OTIS's competition here
EPAC vs SYM Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SYM trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 59.77. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SYM's competition here
EPAC vs P Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while P trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas P's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check P's competition here
EPAC vs INIO Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while INIO trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1401.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check INIO's competition here
EPAC vs ITT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while ITT trades at $192.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITT's competition here
EPAC vs MAIR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MAIR trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 188.83. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MAIR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MAIR's competition here
EPAC vs IEX Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while IEX trades at $224.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IEX's competition here
EPAC vs NDSN Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while NDSN trades at $288.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NDSN's competition here
EPAC vs RRX Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while RRX trades at $206.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RRX's competition here
EPAC vs GNRC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GNRC trades at $214.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GNRC's competition here
EPAC vs CR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CR trades at $217.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CR's competition here
EPAC vs GGG Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GGG trades at $74.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GGG's competition here
EPAC vs WTS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while WTS trades at $346.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WTS's competition here
EPAC vs DCI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while DCI trades at $90.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DCI's competition here
EPAC vs PNR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PNR trades at $62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PNR's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS's competition here
EPAC vs FLS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while FLS trades at $68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FLS's competition here
EPAC vs AOS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while AOS trades at $58.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AOS's competition here
EPAC vs OKLO Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while OKLO trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -48.93. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OKLO's competition here
EPAC vs MIDDV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIDDV's competition here
EPAC vs JBTM Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while JBTM trades at $134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBTM's competition here
EPAC vs NPO Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while NPO trades at $322.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPO's competition here
EPAC vs GTES Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GTES trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTES's competition here
EPAC vs AEBIV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AEBIV's competition here
EPAC vs MIDD Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MIDD trades at $133.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIDD's competition here
EPAC vs XMTR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while XMTR trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is 205.29. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XMTR's competition here
EPAC vs CSWI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSWI's competition here
EPAC vs FELE Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while FELE trades at $105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FELE's competition here
EPAC vs CSW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CSW trades at $279.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSW's competition here
EPAC vs BMI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BMI trades at $149.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BMI's competition here
EPAC vs AIMC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIMC's competition here
EPAC vs JBT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBT's competition here
EPAC vs MWA Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MWA trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MWA's competition here
EPAC vs MIR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MIR trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR's competition here
EPAC vs SXI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SXI trades at $302.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SXI's competition here
EPAC vs KAI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while KAI trades at $311.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KAI's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS-PB Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
EPAC vs CXT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CXT trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CXT's competition here
EPAC vs ATS Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while ATS trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ATS's competition here
EPAC vs HLIO Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HLIO trades at $81.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HLIO's competition here
EPAC vs MIR-WT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR-WT's competition here
EPAC vs HI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HI's competition here
EPAC vs CFX Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CFX's competition here
EPAC vs GRC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GRC trades at $79.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GRC's competition here
EPAC vs SHPW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHPW's competition here
EPAC vs BW-PA Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BW-PA trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW-PA's competition here
EPAC vs CYD Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CYD trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CYD's competition here
EPAC vs AMSC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while AMSC trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AMSC's competition here
EPAC vs MFPVV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MFPVV's competition here
EPAC vs TNC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while TNC trades at $86.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TNC's competition here
EPAC vs GHM Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GHM trades at $107.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 86.50. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GHM's competition here
EPAC vs CIR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CIR's competition here
EPAC vs BW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BW trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW's competition here
EPAC vs KODK Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 750.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while KODK trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KODK's competition here
EPAC vs PSIX Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 697.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PSIX trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSIX's competition here
EPAC vs KRNT Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while KRNT trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 51.81. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KRNT's competition here
EPAC vs PKOH Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PKOH trades at $37.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PKOH's competition here
EPAC vs EROC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EROC has a market cap of 518.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while EROC trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas EROC's P/E ratio is -359.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EROC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to EROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check EROC's competition here
EPAC vs MTW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MTW trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MTW's competition here
EPAC vs LXFR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 445.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while LXFR trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LXFR's competition here
EPAC vs BGRY Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BGRY's competition here
EPAC vs SERV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SERV trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SERV's competition here
EPAC vs TWIN Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while TWIN trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 68.45. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TWIN's competition here
EPAC vs XE Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while XE trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XE's competition here
EPAC vs OFLX Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 301.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while OFLX trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OFLX's competition here
EPAC vs RR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while RR trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RR's competition here
EPAC vs GENC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GENC trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GENC's competition here
EPAC vs VELO Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while VELO trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check VELO's competition here
EPAC vs TAYD Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while TAYD trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TAYD's competition here
EPAC vs SHMDW Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 162.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SHMDW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMDW's competition here
EPAC vs SHMD Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SHMD trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMD's competition here
EPAC vs HURC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HURC trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HURC's competition here
EPAC vs NPWR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while NPWR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPWR's competition here
EPAC vs KULR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while KULR trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KULR's competition here
EPAC vs HUHU Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HUHU trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -89.64. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HUHU's competition here
EPAC vs BWEN Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BWEN trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -80.33. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BWEN's competition here
EPAC vs SOTK Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SOTK trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SOTK's competition here
EPAC vs PYR Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PYR's competition here
EPAC vs HDRN Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HDRN trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HDRN's competition here
EPAC vs CVV Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while CVV trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CVV's competition here
EPAC vs MCRP Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while MCRP trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MCRP's competition here
EPAC vs XCH Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while XCH trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XCH's competition here
EPAC vs SCAG Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while SCAG trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SCAG's competition here
EPAC vs LASE Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while LASE trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LASE's competition here
EPAC vs GTEC Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while GTEC trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTEC's competition here
EPAC vs BURU Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while BURU trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BURU's competition here
EPAC vs HCAI Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while HCAI trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCAI's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HCAI's competition here
EPAC vs JCSE Comparison July 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $34.61, while JCSE trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCSE's competition here