Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PH trades at $1,069.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PH's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while TT trades at $478.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check TT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while EMR trades at $163.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check EMR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CMI trades at $637.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CMI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ITW trades at $292.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ITW's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PCAR trades at $131.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PCAR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CARR trades at $63.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CARR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ROK trades at $451.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ROK's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while P trades at $111.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas P's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check P's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while IR trades at $84.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check IR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while XYL trades at $121.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check XYL's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while OTIS trades at $73.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check OTIS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while DOV trades at $208.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check DOV's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SYM trades at $41.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SYM's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while INIO trades at $28.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1412.00. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check INIO's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ITT trades at $216.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ITT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while IEX trades at $240.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check IEX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while NDSN trades at $311.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check NDSN's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MAIR trades at $31.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 177.08. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MAIR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $420.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check LII's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GGG trades at $82.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GGG's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GNRC trades at $221.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GNRC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while WTS trades at $386.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check WTS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CR trades at $222.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while RRX trades at $172.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check RRX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while DCI trades at $96.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check DCI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MOD trades at $199.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MOD's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PNR trades at $65.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PNR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while FLS trades at $80.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check FLS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GTLS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while OSK trades at $155.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check OSK's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while AOS trades at $62.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check AOS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ZWS trades at $51.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ZWS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while TEX trades at $68.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check TEX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while NPO trades at $341.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check NPO's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GTES trades at $27.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GTES's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MIDDV's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $85.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 58.38. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check AAON's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is similarly volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check AEBIV's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while JBTM trades at $118.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check JBTM's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MIDD trades at $118.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MIDD's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ESAB trades at $86.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ESAB's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ALH's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CSWI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while FELE trades at $107.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check FELE's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while VNT trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check VNT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MWA trades at $26.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MWA's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check AIMC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SXI trades at $330.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SXI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check JBT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while KAI trades at $334.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check KAI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while BMI trades at $134.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check BMI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MIR trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MIR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CXT trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CXT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HLIO trades at $80.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HLIO's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HI's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GRC trades at $81.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GRC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CFX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ALG trades at $165.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ALG's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ATS trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ATS's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while EPAC trades at $37.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check EPAC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while BW-PA trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check BW-PA's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CYD trades at $46.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CYD's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MFPVV's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while BW trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check BW's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GHM trades at $113.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 78.51. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GHM's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while TNC trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check TNC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CIR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 992.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while KODK trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check KODK's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 992.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while ASTE trades at $43.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check ASTE's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 980.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PSIX trades at $42.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PSIX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 817.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while KRNT trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check KRNT's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 723.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while MTW trades at $20.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check MTW's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 711M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PKOH trades at $49.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PKOH's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HY trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HY's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while CMCO trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check CMCO's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while LXFR trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check LXFR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while VELO trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1176.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check VELO's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 446.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while XE trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -61.22. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check XE's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SERV trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SERV's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while TWIN trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 74.48. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check TWIN's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SHMD trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SHMD's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check BGRY's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while RR trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check RR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while OFLX trades at $30.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check OFLX's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while GENC trades at $18.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check GENC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SHMDW trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SHMDW's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while TAYD trades at $53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check TAYD's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while NPWR trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check NPWR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HURC trades at $22.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HURC's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while KULR trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check KULR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HDRN trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HDRN's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while HUHU trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -99.80. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check HUHU's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while BWEN trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -90.67. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check BWEN's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while SOTK trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check SOTK's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check PYR's competition here

Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHPW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHPW is priced at $0.30 on the NASDAQ, while LASE trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHPW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SHPW's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHPW is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHPW.Check LASE's competition here