Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FLS's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FLS and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | $79.95 | +1.67% | 10.3B | 21.21 | $3.77 | +1.07% |
| PH | $1,073.87 | +0.38% | 135.4B | 33.24 | $32.31 | +0.68% |
| TT | $482.31 | +0.76% | 106.1B | 36.40 | $13.25 | +0.83% |
| CMI | $644.26 | +0.04% | 88.9B | 26.52 | $24.28 | +1.24% |
| EMR | $158.26 | -2.59% | 88.7B | 25.01 | $6.33 | +1.38% |
| ITW | $296.66 | +0.67% | 85.3B | 27.54 | $10.77 | +2.17% |
| PCAR | $133.11 | +0.80% | 70.1B | 28.32 | $4.70 | +2.06% |
| CARR | $64.01 | +0.08% | 52.8B | 25.60 | $2.50 | +1.48% |
| ROK | $441.04 | -0.17% | 49.1B | 34.23 | $12.88 | +1.23% |
| IR | $86.97 | -1.44% | 34B | 25.65 | $3.39 | +0.09% |
Stock Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH)
FLS vs PH Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PH trades at $1,073.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PH's competition here
Trane Technologies plc (NYSE: TT)
FLS vs TT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $482.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TT's competition here
Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI)
FLS vs CMI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $644.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMI's competition here
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR)
FLS vs EMR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $158.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EMR's competition here
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE: ITW)
FLS vs ITW Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $296.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITW's competition here
PACCAR Inc (NASDAQ: PCAR)
FLS vs PCAR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $133.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PCAR's competition here
Carrier Global Corporation (NYSE: CARR)
FLS vs CARR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CARR's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
FLS vs ROK Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $441.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ROK's competition here
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR)
FLS vs IR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $86.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IR's competition here
Everpure, Inc. (NYSE: P)
FLS vs P Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while P trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas P's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check P's competition here
Dover Corporation (NYSE: DOV)
FLS vs DOV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $211.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DOV's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: OTIS)
FLS vs OTIS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OTIS's competition here
Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL)
FLS vs XYL Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $120.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XYL's competition here
Symbotic Inc. (NASDAQ: SYM)
FLS vs SYM Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $40.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 48.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SYM's competition here
INNIO N.V. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: INIO)
FLS vs INIO Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is -1367.50. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check INIO's competition here
ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT)
FLS vs ITT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $213.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITT's competition here
IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX)
FLS vs IEX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $234.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IEX's competition here
Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ: NDSN)
FLS vs NDSN Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $310.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NDSN's competition here
Madison Air Solutions Corporation (NYSE: MAIR)
FLS vs MAIR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 172.72. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MAIR's competition here
Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII)
FLS vs LII Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $439.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is similarly volatile compared to LII. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LII's competition here
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG)
FLS vs GGG Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $83.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GGG's competition here
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: WTS)
FLS vs WTS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $392.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WTS's competition here
Crane Company (NYSE: CR)
FLS vs CR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $219.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CR's competition here
Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC)
FLS vs GNRC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $212.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GNRC's competition here
Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE: RRX)
FLS vs RRX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RRX's competition here
Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE: DCI)
FLS vs DCI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $98.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DCI's competition here
Pentair plc (NYSE: PNR)
FLS vs PNR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $68.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PNR's competition here
Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD)
FLS vs MOD Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $195.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MOD's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS)
FLS vs GTLS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS's competition here
Oshkosh Corp (NYSE: OSK)
FLS vs OSK Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while OSK trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to OSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OSK's competition here
A. O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS)
FLS vs AOS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AOS's competition here
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (NYSE: ZWS)
FLS vs ZWS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $51.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ZWS's competition here
AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON)
FLS vs AAON Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $94.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 64.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AAON's competition here
Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX)
FLS vs TEX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $67.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TEX's competition here
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (NYSE: GTES)
FLS vs GTES Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTES's competition here
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPO)
FLS vs NPO Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $332.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPO's competition here
Middleby Corp. (NASDAQ: MIDDV)
FLS vs MIDDV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDDV's competition here
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG Common Stock When-Issued (NASDAQ: AEBIV)
FLS vs AEBIV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AEBIV's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBTM)
FLS vs JBTM Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $123.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBTM's competition here
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD)
FLS vs MIDD Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDD's competition here
ESAB Corporation (NYSE: ESAB)
FLS vs ESAB Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ESAB's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
FLS vs ALH Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ALH's competition here
Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT)
FLS vs VNT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check VNT's competition here
CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSWI)
FLS vs CSWI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSWI's competition here
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE)
FLS vs FELE Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $109.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FELE's competition here
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (NYSE: MWA)
FLS vs MWA Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MWA's competition here
Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI)
FLS vs SXI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $340.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SXI's competition here
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. (NASDAQ: AIMC)
FLS vs AIMC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIMC's competition here
Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI)
FLS vs BMI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $138.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BMI's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBT)
FLS vs JBT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBT's competition here
Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI)
FLS vs KAI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $337.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KAI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR)
FLS vs MIR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS-PB)
FLS vs GTLS-PB Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
Crane NXT, Co. (NYSE: CXT)
FLS vs CXT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CXT's competition here
Helios Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: HLIO)
FLS vs HLIO Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $83.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HLIO's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR-WT)
FLS vs MIR-WT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR-WT's competition here
Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI)
FLS vs HI Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HI's competition here
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE: GRC)
FLS vs GRC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $83.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GRC's competition here
Colfax Corporation (NYSE: CFX)
FLS vs CFX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CFX's competition here
Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW)
FLS vs SHPW Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHPW's competition here
ATS Corporation (NYSE: ATS)
FLS vs ATS Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ATS's competition here
Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG)
FLS vs ALG Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $168.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ALG's competition here
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE: EPAC)
FLS vs EPAC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EPAC's competition here
China Yuchai International Limited (NYSE: CYD)
FLS vs CYD Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CYD trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CYD's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW-PA)
FLS vs BW-PA Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.13. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW-PA's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFPVV)
FLS vs MFPVV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MFPVV's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW)
FLS vs BW Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW's competition here
Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM)
FLS vs GHM Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $111.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 77.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GHM's competition here
Tennant Company (NYSE: TNC)
FLS vs TNC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $73.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TNC's competition here
CIRCOR International, Inc. (NYSE: CIR)
FLS vs CIR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CIR's competition here
Astec Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTE)
FLS vs ASTE Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ASTE's competition here
Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK)
FLS vs KODK Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 982M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KODK's competition here
Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX)
FLS vs PSIX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 940.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSIX's competition here
Kornit Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: KRNT)
FLS vs KRNT Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 791.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KRNT's competition here
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: PKOH)
FLS vs PKOH Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $52.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PKOH's competition here
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW)
FLS vs MTW Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 675.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 53.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MTW's competition here
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (NYSE: HY)
FLS vs HY Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 656.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HY's competition here
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCO)
FLS vs CMCO Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 583M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMCO's competition here
X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: XE)
FLS vs XE Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 497.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -68.14. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XE's competition here
Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR)
FLS vs LXFR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LXFR's competition here
Serve Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: SERV)
FLS vs SERV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SERV's competition here
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN)
FLS vs TWIN Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 348.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 73.15. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TWIN's competition here
Berkshire Grey, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGRY)
FLS vs BGRY Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BGRY's competition here
Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFLX)
FLS vs OFLX Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 312.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OFLX's competition here
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (NASDAQ: RR)
FLS vs RR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RR's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NASDAQ: VELO)
FLS vs VELO Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VELO's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check VELO's competition here
Gencor Industries, Inc. (AMEX: GENC)
FLS vs GENC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GENC's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: SHMD)
FLS vs SHMD Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMD's competition here
Taylor Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAYD)
FLS vs TAYD Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $54.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TAYD's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Warrants (NASDAQ: SHMDW)
FLS vs SHMDW Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SHMDW trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMDW's competition here
Hurco Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HURC)
FLS vs HURC Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HURC's competition here
HUHUTECH International Group Inc. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: HUHU)
FLS vs HUHU Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HUHU trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -107.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HUHU's competition here
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (AMEX: KULR)
FLS vs KULR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KULR's competition here
NET Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR)
FLS vs NPWR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPWR's competition here
Broadwind, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWEN)
FLS vs BWEN Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while BWEN trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -77.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BWEN's competition here
Sono-Tek Corporation (NASDAQ: SOTK)
FLS vs SOTK Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while SOTK trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SOTK's competition here
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (NASDAQ: PYR)
FLS vs PYR Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PYR's competition here
Hadron Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: HDRN)
FLS vs HDRN Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while HDRN trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HDRN's competition here
CVD Equipment Corporation (NASDAQ: CVV)
FLS vs CVV Comparison August 2026
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $79.95 on the NYSE, while CVV trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CVV's competition here