Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 205B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GEV trades at $774.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GEV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PH trades at $917.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PH's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $162.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EMR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $401.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $280.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITW's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while HON trades at $220.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HON's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $450.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $101.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PCAR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $52.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CARR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $375.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ROK's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $82.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $78.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OTIS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $203.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DOV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $97.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XYL's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SYM's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $205.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $309.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NDSN's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $226.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IEX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $341.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LII's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $201.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $346.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WTS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 46.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MAIR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $169.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RRX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $67.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GGG's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $68.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PNR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $176.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GNRC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 105.73. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check INIO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $84.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DCI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $64.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AOS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $43.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ZWS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDDV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $128.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBTM's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AEBIV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $54.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TEX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $136.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDD's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTES's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $258.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $82.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ESAB's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $96.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MOD's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSWI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $57.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AAON's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $158.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BMI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ALH's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $94.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FELE's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIMC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $24.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MWA's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $292.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KAI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $57.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CXT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $228.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SXI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HI's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CFX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHPW's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $38.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EPAC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MFP trades at $42.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 117.74. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MFP's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $67.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GRC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ATS's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $133.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ALG's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MFPVV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $47.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HLIO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW-PA's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $71.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TNC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 914.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $78.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 54.13. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GHM's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 902.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $39.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSIX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 838.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PLOW trades at $36.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PLOW's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $35.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ASTE's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 806.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $22.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MTW's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KODK's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 724M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KRNT's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 632.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $43.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PKOH's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMCO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 509M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $28.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HY's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 463.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LXFR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BGRY's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $22.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TWIN's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SERV's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GENC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 242.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OFLX's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PPIH trades at $28.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PPIH's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XE's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BNC trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BNC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $56.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TAYD's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check VELO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMD's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HURC's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NANO has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while NANO trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas NANO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NANO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NANO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NANO's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while FISN trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FISN's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while BWNB trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BWNB's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TRBG has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while TRBG trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas TRBG's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TRBG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TRBG's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPWR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KULR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PYR's competition here

Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $80.37 on the NYSE, while SOTK trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.32, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SOTK's competition here