Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK | $476.82 | -0.54% | 53B | 39.04 | $12.21 | +1.14% |
| PH | $968.92 | -2.12% | 122.1B | 31.52 | $30.73 | +0.76% |
| TT | $477.89 | -5.08% | 105.6B | 36.82 | $12.98 | +0.83% |
| CMI | $685.87 | -5.73% | 94.6B | 28.58 | $23.98 | +1.17% |
| EMR | $143.49 | -1.27% | 80.4B | 23.37 | $6.14 | +1.53% |
| ITW | $267.71 | -1.07% | 77B | 24.85 | $10.77 | +2.37% |
| PCAR | $120.68 | -0.82% | 63.5B | 25.68 | $4.70 | +2.27% |
| CARR | $73.59 | -3.17% | 61.2B | 29.45 | $2.50 | +1.26% |
| IR | $81.37 | -0.40% | 31.9B | 24.04 | $3.39 | +0.10% |
| DOV | $225.96 | -2.07% | 30.4B | 22.93 | $9.85 | +0.92% |
Stock Comparison
ROK vs PH Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PH trades at $968.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PH's competition here
ROK vs TT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while TT trades at $477.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TT's competition here
ROK vs CMI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CMI trades at $685.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CMI's competition here
ROK vs EMR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while EMR trades at $143.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check EMR's competition here
ROK vs ITW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while ITW trades at $267.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ITW's competition here
ROK vs PCAR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PCAR trades at $120.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PCAR's competition here
ROK vs CARR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CARR trades at $73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CARR's competition here
ROK vs IR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while IR trades at $81.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check IR's competition here
ROK vs DOV Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while DOV trades at $225.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check DOV's competition here
ROK vs OTIS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while OTIS trades at $73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check OTIS's competition here
ROK vs INIO Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while INIO trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 266.93. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check INIO's competition here
ROK vs XYL Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while XYL trades at $116.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XYL's competition here
ROK vs SYM Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SYM trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SYM's competition here
ROK vs P Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while P trades at $69.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas P's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check P's competition here
ROK vs MAIR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MAIR trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MAIR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MAIR's competition here
ROK vs FTV Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while FTV trades at $61.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check FTV's competition here
ROK vs ITT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while ITT trades at $193.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ITT's competition here
ROK vs IEX Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while IEX trades at $227.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check IEX's competition here
ROK vs NDSN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while NDSN trades at $301.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NDSN's competition here
ROK vs GNRC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GNRC trades at $278.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GNRC's competition here
ROK vs RRX Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while RRX trades at $219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check RRX's competition here
ROK vs GGG Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GGG trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GGG's competition here
ROK vs CR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CR trades at $219.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CR's competition here
ROK vs PNR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PNR trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PNR's competition here
ROK vs WTS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while WTS trades at $359.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check WTS's competition here
ROK vs SPXC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SPXC trades at $231.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SPXC's competition here
ROK vs DCI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while DCI trades at $88.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check DCI's competition here
ROK vs GTLS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GTLS trades at $208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTLS's competition here
ROK vs FLS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while FLS trades at $72.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check FLS's competition here
ROK vs OKLO Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while OKLO trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -59.61. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check OKLO's competition here
ROK vs AOS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while AOS trades at $61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AOS's competition here
ROK vs NPO Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while NPO trades at $379.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NPO's competition here
ROK vs MIDD Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MIDD trades at $173.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MIDD's competition here
ROK vs GTES Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GTES trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTES's competition here
ROK vs JBTM Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while JBTM trades at $139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JBTM's competition here
ROK vs AEBIV Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AEBIV's competition here
ROK vs PSN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PSN trades at $50.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PSN's competition here
ROK vs XMTR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while XMTR trades at $94.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is 196.60. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XMTR's competition here
ROK vs CSWI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CSWI's competition here
ROK vs FELE Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while FELE trades at $107.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check FELE's competition here
ROK vs CSW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CSW trades at $282.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CSW's competition here
ROK vs MIR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MIR trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MIR's competition here
ROK vs MWA Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MWA trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MWA's competition here
ROK vs SXI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SXI trades at $340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SXI's competition here
ROK vs AIMC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AIMC's competition here
ROK vs JBT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JBT's competition here
ROK vs KAI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while KAI trades at $324.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check KAI's competition here
ROK vs GTLS-PB Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
ROK vs HLIO Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HLIO trades at $90.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HLIO's competition here
ROK vs CXT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CXT trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CXT's competition here
ROK vs ATS Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while ATS trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ATS's competition here
ROK vs MIR-WT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MIR-WT's competition here
ROK vs GRC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GRC trades at $89.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GRC's competition here
ROK vs HI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HI's competition here
ROK vs CFX Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CFX's competition here
ROK vs SHPW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHPW's competition here
ROK vs EPAC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while EPAC trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check EPAC's competition here
ROK vs AMSC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while AMSC trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AMSC's competition here
ROK vs BW-PA Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BW-PA trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BW-PA's competition here
ROK vs CYD Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CYD trades at $44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CYD's competition here
ROK vs BW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BW trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -65.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BW's competition here
ROK vs TNC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while TNC trades at $91.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TNC's competition here
ROK vs GHM Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GHM trades at $121.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 86.87. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GHM's competition here
ROK vs CIR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CIR's competition here
ROK vs BLDP Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BLDP trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BLDP's competition here
ROK vs PSIX Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 875.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PSIX trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PSIX's competition here
ROK vs KRNT Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 744.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while KRNT trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check KRNT's competition here
ROK vs EROC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, EROC has a market cap of 663.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while EROC trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas EROC's P/E ratio is 137.80. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EROC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to EROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check EROC's competition here
ROK vs PKOH Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PKOH trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PKOH's competition here
ROK vs MTW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MTW trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MTW's competition here
ROK vs LXFR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 501.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while LXFR trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check LXFR's competition here
ROK vs XE Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while XE trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -91.41. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XE's competition here
ROK vs SERV Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SERV trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SERV's competition here
ROK vs RR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while RR trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check RR's competition here
ROK vs TWIN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 348.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while TWIN trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 73.30. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TWIN's competition here
ROK vs BGRY Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BGRY's competition here
ROK vs VELO Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while VELO trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check VELO's competition here
ROK vs OFLX Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while OFLX trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check OFLX's competition here
ROK vs HUHU Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 248.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HUHU trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -194.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HUHU's competition here
ROK vs SHMD Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SHMD trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHMD's competition here
ROK vs GENC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GENC trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GENC's competition here
ROK vs TAYD Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while TAYD trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TAYD's competition here
ROK vs KULR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while KULR trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check KULR's competition here
ROK vs HURC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HURC trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HURC's competition here
ROK vs NPWR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while NPWR trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NPWR's competition here
ROK vs BWEN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BWEN trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -72.33. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BWEN's competition here
ROK vs SHMDW Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SHMDW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHMDW's competition here
ROK vs PYR Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PYR's competition here
ROK vs HDRN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HDRN trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HDRN's competition here
ROK vs MCRP Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while MCRP trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MCRP's competition here
ROK vs XCH Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while XCH trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XCH's competition here
ROK vs CVV Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CVV trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CVV's competition here
ROK vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while SCAG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SCAG's competition here
ROK vs LASE Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while LASE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check LASE's competition here
ROK vs BURU Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while BURU trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BURU's competition here
ROK vs GTEC Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while GTEC trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTEC's competition here
ROK vs HCAI Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while HCAI trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HCAI's competition here
ROK vs CGRN Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CGRN's competition here
ROK vs JCSE Comparison June 2026
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 53B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $476.82, while JCSE trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 39.04, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JCSE's competition here