Trane Technologies plc (TT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | $478.13 | -1.33% | 105.7B | 36.09 | $13.25 | +0.83% |
| PH | $962.89 | -0.10% | 121.4B | 31.33 | $30.73 | +0.77% |
| CMI | $661.70 | -3.02% | 91.3B | 27.59 | $23.98 | +1.21% |
| ITW | $272.76 | +1.41% | 78.5B | 25.33 | $10.77 | +2.36% |
| EMR | $139.05 | -0.34% | 77.9B | 22.65 | $6.14 | +1.58% |
| PCAR | $119.50 | -1.44% | 62.9B | 25.43 | $4.70 | +2.29% |
| CARR | $70.07 | -2.78% | 58.2B | 28.03 | $2.50 | +1.33% |
| ROK | $471.70 | -2.30% | 52.5B | 38.63 | $12.21 | +1.16% |
| IR | $80.59 | -0.33% | 31.5B | 23.77 | $3.39 | +0.10% |
| DOV | $213.71 | -1.59% | 28.8B | 21.70 | $9.85 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
TT vs PH Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PH trades at $962.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PH's competition here
TT vs CMI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CMI trades at $661.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CMI's competition here
TT vs ITW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while ITW trades at $272.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ITW's competition here
TT vs EMR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while EMR trades at $139.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check EMR's competition here
TT vs PCAR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PCAR trades at $119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PCAR's competition here
TT vs CARR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CARR trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CARR's competition here
TT vs ROK Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while ROK trades at $471.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ROK's competition here
TT vs IR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while IR trades at $80.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check IR's competition here
TT vs DOV Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while DOV trades at $213.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check DOV's competition here
TT vs XYL Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while XYL trades at $118.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check XYL's competition here
TT vs OTIS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while OTIS trades at $73.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OTIS's competition here
TT vs INIO Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while INIO trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 263.93. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check INIO's competition here
TT vs SYM Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SYM trades at $42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SYM's competition here
TT vs P Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while P trades at $72.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas P's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check P's competition here
TT vs FTV Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while FTV trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FTV's competition here
TT vs MAIR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MAIR trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 204.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAIR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MAIR's competition here
TT vs ITT Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while ITT trades at $186.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ITT's competition here
TT vs IEX Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while IEX trades at $223.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check IEX's competition here
TT vs NDSN Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while NDSN trades at $290.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NDSN's competition here
TT vs GNRC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GNRC trades at $252.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GNRC's competition here
TT vs RRX Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while RRX trades at $218.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check RRX's competition here
TT vs CR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CR trades at $217.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CR's competition here
TT vs GGG Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GGG trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GGG's competition here
TT vs PNR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PNR trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PNR's competition here
TT vs WTS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while WTS trades at $368.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check WTS's competition here
TT vs SPXC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SPXC trades at $227.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SPXC's competition here
TT vs DCI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while DCI trades at $89.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check DCI's competition here
TT vs GTLS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GTLS trades at $208.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GTLS's competition here
TT vs FLS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while FLS trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FLS's competition here
TT vs OKLO Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while OKLO trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -62.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OKLO's competition here
TT vs AOS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while AOS trades at $62.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AOS's competition here
TT vs MIDD Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MIDD trades at $175.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MIDD's competition here
TT vs JBTM Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while JBTM trades at $145.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JBTM's competition here
TT vs NPO Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while NPO trades at $335.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NPO's competition here
TT vs GTES Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GTES trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GTES's competition here
TT vs AEBIV Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AEBIV's competition here
TT vs PSN Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PSN trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PSN's competition here
TT vs XMTR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while XMTR trades at $91.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is 191.28. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check XMTR's competition here
TT vs CSWI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSWI's competition here
TT vs FELE Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while FELE trades at $105.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FELE's competition here
TT vs CSW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CSW trades at $276.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSW's competition here
TT vs BMI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BMI trades at $145.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BMI's competition here
TT vs MIR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MIR trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MIR's competition here
TT vs AIMC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AIMC's competition here
TT vs JBT Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JBT's competition here
TT vs SXI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SXI trades at $327.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SXI's competition here
TT vs MWA Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MWA trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MWA's competition here
TT vs KAI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while KAI trades at $309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check KAI's competition here
TT vs GTLS-PB Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
TT vs CXT Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CXT trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CXT's competition here
TT vs HLIO Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while HLIO trades at $82.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HLIO's competition here
TT vs ATS Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while ATS trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ATS's competition here
TT vs MIR-WT Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MIR-WT's competition here
TT vs HI Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HI's competition here
TT vs GRC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GRC trades at $84.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GRC's competition here
TT vs CFX Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CFX's competition here
TT vs SHPW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SHPW's competition here
TT vs EPAC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while EPAC trades at $34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check EPAC's competition here
TT vs AMSC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while AMSC trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AMSC's competition here
TT vs BW-PA Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BW-PA trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BW-PA's competition here
TT vs CYD Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CYD trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CYD's competition here
TT vs TNC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while TNC trades at $87.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TNC's competition here
TT vs GHM Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GHM trades at $115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 82.44. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GHM's competition here
TT vs BW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BW trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -53.36. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BW's competition here
TT vs CIR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CIR's competition here
TT vs BLDP Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BLDP trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BLDP's competition here
TT vs PSIX Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 854.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PSIX trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PSIX's competition here
TT vs KODK Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 826.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while KODK trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check KODK's competition here
TT vs EROC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, EROC has a market cap of 745.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while EROC trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas EROC's P/E ratio is 154.70. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EROC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to EROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check EROC's competition here
TT vs KRNT Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while KRNT trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check KRNT's competition here
TT vs PKOH Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 522.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PKOH trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PKOH's competition here
TT vs LXFR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while LXFR trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LXFR's competition here
TT vs MTW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 449.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MTW trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MTW's competition here
TT vs SERV Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 420.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SERV trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SERV's competition here
TT vs XE Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 379.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while XE trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -51.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check XE's competition here
TT vs RR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while RR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check RR's competition here
TT vs BGRY Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BGRY's competition here
TT vs TWIN Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while TWIN trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 69.27. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TWIN's competition here
TT vs OFLX Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 316.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while OFLX trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OFLX's competition here
TT vs VELO Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 303.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while VELO trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VELO's competition here
TT vs SHMD Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SHMD trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SHMD's competition here
TT vs GENC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GENC trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GENC's competition here
TT vs HUHU Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while HUHU trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -170.52. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HUHU's competition here
TT vs TAYD Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while TAYD trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TAYD's competition here
TT vs KULR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while KULR trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check KULR's competition here
TT vs NPWR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while NPWR trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NPWR's competition here
TT vs HURC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while HURC trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HURC's competition here
TT vs BWEN Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BWEN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -76.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BWEN's competition here
TT vs SOTK Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SOTK trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 47.27. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SOTK's competition here
TT vs PYR Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PYR's competition here
TT vs SHMDW Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SHMDW trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SHMDW's competition here
TT vs HDRN Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while HDRN trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HDRN's competition here
TT vs MCRP Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while MCRP trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check MCRP's competition here
TT vs CVV Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while CVV trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CVV's competition here
TT vs XCH Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while XCH trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check XCH's competition here
TT vs SCAG Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while SCAG trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SCAG's competition here
TT vs LASE Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while LASE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LASE's ROE of -44.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LASE's competition here
TT vs BURU Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while BURU trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BURU's competition here
TT vs GTEC Comparison July 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 105.7B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $478.13, while GTEC trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GTEC's competition here