Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See NANO's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for NANO and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANO | $3.95 | -15.42% | 124.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GEV | $900.72 | +0.63% | 234B | 25.15 | $34.94 | +0.23% |
| PH | $926.21 | +2.83% | 115B | 28.23 | $32.31 | +0.83% |
| TT | $423.63 | -8.12% | 98.7B | 33.87 | $13.25 | +0.90% |
| EMR | $170.39 | +2.48% | 93.5B | 26.49 | $6.33 | +1.33% |
| ITW | $277.92 | +0.72% | 78.7B | 25.65 | $10.77 | +2.38% |
| CMI | $521.87 | -1.65% | 73.2B | 21.90 | $24.28 | +1.55% |
| PCAR | $102.17 | -1.50% | 53.9B | 19.51 | $5.25 | +2.71% |
| ROK | $449.26 | +2.29% | 49.4B | 34.48 | $12.88 | +1.24% |
| CARR | $54.08 | -6.48% | 46.4B | 22.51 | $2.50 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE: GEV)
NANO vs GEV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 234B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GEV trades at $900.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GEV's competition here
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH)
NANO vs PH Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PH trades at $926.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PH's competition here
Trane Technologies plc (NYSE: TT)
NANO vs TT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TT trades at $423.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TT's competition here
Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR)
NANO vs EMR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while EMR trades at $170.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check EMR's competition here
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE: ITW)
NANO vs ITW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ITW trades at $277.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ITW's competition here
Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI)
NANO vs CMI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CMI trades at $521.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CMI's competition here
PACCAR Inc (NASDAQ: PCAR)
NANO vs PCAR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PCAR trades at $102.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PCAR's competition here
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
NANO vs ROK Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ROK trades at $449.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ROK's competition here
Carrier Global Corporation (NYSE: CARR)
NANO vs CARR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CARR trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CARR's competition here
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR)
NANO vs IR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while IR trades at $76.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check IR's competition here
Dover Corporation (NYSE: DOV)
NANO vs DOV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while DOV trades at $209.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check DOV's competition here
Otis Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: OTIS)
NANO vs OTIS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while OTIS trades at $73.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check OTIS's competition here
Symbotic Inc. (NASDAQ: SYM)
NANO vs SYM Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SYM trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 46.94. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SYM's competition here
Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL)
NANO vs XYL Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while XYL trades at $89.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check XYL's competition here
Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ: NDSN)
NANO vs NDSN Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while NDSN trades at $329.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check NDSN's competition here
IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX)
NANO vs IEX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while IEX trades at $235.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check IEX's competition here
ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT)
NANO vs ITT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ITT trades at $201.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ITT's competition here
INNIO N.V. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: INIO)
NANO vs INIO Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while INIO trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 612.33. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to INIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check INIO's competition here
Madison Air Solutions Corporation (NYSE: MAIR)
NANO vs MAIR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MAIR trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MAIR's competition here
Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC)
NANO vs GNRC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GNRC trades at $212.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GNRC's competition here
Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII)
NANO vs LII Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $336.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to LII's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check LII's competition here
Crane Company (NYSE: CR)
NANO vs CR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CR trades at $205.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CR's competition here
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: WTS)
NANO vs WTS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while WTS trades at $349.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check WTS's competition here
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG)
NANO vs GGG Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GGG trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GGG's competition here
Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE: RRX)
NANO vs RRX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while RRX trades at $164.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check RRX's competition here
Pentair plc (NYSE: PNR)
NANO vs PNR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PNR trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PNR's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS)
NANO vs GTLS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GTLS's competition here
Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE: DCI)
NANO vs DCI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while DCI trades at $85.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check DCI's competition here
Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS)
NANO vs FLS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while FLS trades at $78.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check FLS's competition here
A. O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS)
NANO vs AOS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while AOS trades at $61.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check AOS's competition here
Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD)
NANO vs MOD Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MOD trades at $141.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MOD's competition here
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (NYSE: ZWS)
NANO vs ZWS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ZWS trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ZWS's competition here
Middleby Corp. (NASDAQ: MIDDV)
NANO vs MIDDV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MIDDV's competition here
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (NYSE: GTES)
NANO vs GTES Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GTES trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GTES's competition here
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG Common Stock When-Issued (NASDAQ: AEBIV)
NANO vs AEBIV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check AEBIV's competition here
AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON)
NANO vs AAON Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $75.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check AAON's competition here
Terex Corporation (NYSE: TEX)
NANO vs TEX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TEX trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TEX's competition here
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPO)
NANO vs NPO Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while NPO trades at $286.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check NPO's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBTM)
NANO vs JBTM Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while JBTM trades at $109.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check JBTM's competition here
The Middleby Corporation (NASDAQ: MIDD)
NANO vs MIDD Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MIDD trades at $116.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MIDD's competition here
CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSWI)
NANO vs CSWI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CSWI's competition here
ESAB Corporation (NYSE: ESAB)
NANO vs ESAB Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ESAB trades at $72.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ESAB's competition here
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: FELE)
NANO vs FELE Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while FELE trades at $97.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check FELE's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
NANO vs ALH Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ALH's competition here
Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI)
NANO vs BMI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BMI trades at $144.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BMI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR)
NANO vs MIR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MIR trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MIR's competition here
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. (NASDAQ: AIMC)
NANO vs AIMC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check AIMC's competition here
JBT Marel Corporation (NYSE: JBT)
NANO vs JBT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check JBT's competition here
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (NYSE: MWA)
NANO vs MWA Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MWA trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MWA's competition here
Crane NXT, Co. (NYSE: CXT)
NANO vs CXT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CXT trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CXT's competition here
Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE: GTLS-PB)
NANO vs GTLS-PB Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI)
NANO vs KAI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while KAI trades at $269.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check KAI's competition here
Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI)
NANO vs SXI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SXI trades at $247.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SXI's competition here
Mirion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: MIR-WT)
NANO vs MIR-WT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MIR-WT's competition here
Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI)
NANO vs HI Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to HI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check HI's competition here
Helios Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: HLIO)
NANO vs HLIO Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while HLIO trades at $68.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check HLIO's competition here
Colfax Corporation (NYSE: CFX)
NANO vs CFX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CFX's competition here
Shapeways Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHPW)
NANO vs SHPW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SHPW's competition here
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE: GRC)
NANO vs GRC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GRC trades at $75.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GRC's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFP)
NANO vs MFP Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MFP trades at $42.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 116.33. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MFP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MFP's competition here
ATS Corporation (NYSE: ATS)
NANO vs ATS Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ATS trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ATS's competition here
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE: EPAC)
NANO vs EPAC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while EPAC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check EPAC's competition here
Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG)
NANO vs ALG Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ALG trades at $145.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ALG's competition here
Midera Food Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: MFPVV)
NANO vs MFPVV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MFPVV's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW-PA)
NANO vs BW-PA Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BW-PA trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BW-PA's competition here
Tennant Company (NYSE: TNC)
NANO vs TNC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TNC trades at $66.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TNC's competition here
Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX)
NANO vs PSIX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PSIX trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PSIX's competition here
Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK)
NANO vs KODK Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while KODK trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check KODK's competition here
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (NYSE: PLOW)
NANO vs PLOW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 915.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PLOW trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PLOW's competition here
Astec Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTE)
NANO vs ASTE Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 896M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while ASTE trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check ASTE's competition here
Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM)
NANO vs GHM Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GHM trades at $72.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 49.32. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GHM's competition here
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW)
NANO vs MTW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 811.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while MTW trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check MTW's competition here
Kornit Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: KRNT)
NANO vs KRNT Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while KRNT trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 62.59. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check KRNT's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: BW)
NANO vs BW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 677.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BW trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BW's competition here
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: PKOH)
NANO vs PKOH Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PKOH trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PKOH's competition here
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (NYSE: HY)
NANO vs HY Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 525.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while HY trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check HY's competition here
Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR)
NANO vs LXFR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 465.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while LXFR trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check LXFR's competition here
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCO)
NANO vs CMCO Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 435.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while CMCO trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check CMCO's competition here
Twin Disc, Incorporated (NASDAQ: TWIN)
NANO vs TWIN Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TWIN trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TWIN's competition here
Berkshire Grey, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGRY)
NANO vs BGRY Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BGRY's competition here
Serve Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: SERV)
NANO vs SERV Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SERV trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SERV's competition here
X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: XE)
NANO vs XE Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while XE trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to XE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to XE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check XE's competition here
Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ: OFLX)
NANO vs OFLX Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 252M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while OFLX trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check OFLX's competition here
Gencor Industries, Inc. (AMEX: GENC)
NANO vs GENC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while GENC trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check GENC's competition here
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPIH)
NANO vs PPIH Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while PPIH trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check PPIH's competition here
BNB Standard Corp. (NASDAQ: BNC)
NANO vs BNC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BNC trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BNC's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NASDAQ: VELO)
NANO vs VELO Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while VELO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to VELO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check VELO's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: SHMD)
NANO vs SHMD Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 206.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SHMD trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SHMD's competition here
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (NASDAQ: RR)
NANO vs RR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while RR trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check RR's competition here
Deep Fission, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISN)
NANO vs FISN Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while FISN trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to FISN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check FISN's competition here
Taylor Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAYD)
NANO vs TAYD Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TAYD trades at $57.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TAYD's competition here
Hurco Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HURC)
NANO vs HURC Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while HURC trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -21.09. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check HURC's competition here
SCHMID Group N.V. Warrants (NASDAQ: SHMDW)
NANO vs SHMDW Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SHMDW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SHMDW's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (NYSE: BWNB)
NANO vs BWNB Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BWNB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BWNB's competition here
Sono-Tek Corporation (NASDAQ: SOTK)
NANO vs SOTK Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while SOTK trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check SOTK's competition here
Turbogen Ltd (NASDAQ: TRBG)
NANO vs TRBG Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, TRBG has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while TRBG trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBG's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to TRBG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check TRBG's competition here
NET Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR)
NANO vs NPWR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while NPWR trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check NPWR's competition here
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (AMEX: KULR)
NANO vs KULR Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while KULR trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check KULR's competition here
Broadwind, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWEN)
NANO vs BWEN Comparison October 2026
Forge Nano Holdings Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: NANO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO stands at 124.9M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO is priced at $3.95 on the NASDAQ, while BWEN trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, NANO's ROE is N/A, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.Check BWEN's competition here