Viking Holdings Ltd
Viking Holdings Ltd VIK Peers
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $56.45 | -0.30% | 25B | 76.24 | $0.74 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,717.10 | -0.02% | 185.9B | 35.56 | $160.64 | +0.80% |
| RCL | $338.51 | -0.83% | 91.9B | 27.56 | $12.28 | +0.72% |
| ABNB | $135.35 | -1.20% | 84.8B | 34.35 | $3.94 | N/A |
| TCOM | $61.92 | +0.08% | 40.5B | 18.10 | $3.42 | +0.45% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $183.64 | +0.37% | 22.3B | 21.96 | $8.36 | +0.43% |
| MMYT | $90.86 | -1.37% | 11.8B | 109.47 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $22.62 | -2.27% | 10.1B | 12.85 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TNL | $57.26 | -1.09% | 3.8B | 10.41 | $5.50 | +4.56% |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while BKNG trades at $5,717.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs RCL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while RCL trades at $338.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs ABNB Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while ABNB trades at $135.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TCOM Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while TCOM trades at $61.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs EXPE Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while EXPE trades at $183.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MMYT Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while MMYT trades at $90.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 109.47. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NCLH Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while NCLH trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TNL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while TNL trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TRIP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while TRIP trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs DESP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while SABR trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs LIND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 703.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while LIND trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs YTRA Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while YTRA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TOUR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while TOUR trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NTRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while NTRP trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while MRNOW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MKGI Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs JXG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while JXG trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MOND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MONDW Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 25B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $56.45, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.24, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.