Viking Holdings Ltd
Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $58.86 | +2.26% | 26.1B | 79.55 | $0.74 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,476.09 | +1.67% | 177.5B | 38.22 | $143.28 | +0.67% |
| RCL | $315.70 | +0.46% | 85.7B | 23.47 | $13.45 | +0.78% |
| ABNB | $130.96 | +2.30% | 82B | 33.24 | $3.94 | N/A |
| TCOM | $62.06 | +2.36% | 41.3B | 18.20 | $3.41 | +0.45% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $184.99 | +3.89% | 22.5B | 22.08 | $8.38 | +0.43% |
| NCLH | $25.34 | +3.43% | 11.3B | 17.36 | $1.46 | N/A |
| MMYT | $93.56 | +1.95% | 8.9B | 108.79 | $0.86 | N/A |
| TNL | $59.41 | +1.71% | 3.9B | 10.33 | $5.75 | +3.57% |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 177.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while BKNG trades at $5,476.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here
VIK vs RCL Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while RCL trades at $315.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here
VIK vs ABNB Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while ABNB trades at $130.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here
VIK vs TCOM Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while TCOM trades at $62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here
VIK vs SABRP Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here
VIK vs EXPE Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while EXPE trades at $184.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here
VIK vs NCLH Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while NCLH trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here
VIK vs MMYT Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while MMYT trades at $93.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 108.79. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here
VIK vs TNL Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while TNL trades at $59.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here
VIK vs TRIP Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while TRIP trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TRIP's competition here
VIK vs DESP Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here
VIK vs SABR Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while SABR trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABR's competition here
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 933.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while MRNOW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MRNOW's competition here
VIK vs LIND Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 675.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while LIND trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here
VIK vs YTRA Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while YTRA trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here
VIK vs TOUR Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while TOUR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here
VIK vs NTRP Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while NTRP trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NTRP's competition here
VIK vs MKGI Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here
VIK vs JXG Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while JXG trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here
VIK vs MOND Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MOND's competition here
VIK vs MONDW Comparison August 2025
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $58.86, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 79.55, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.88%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here