Viking Holdings Ltd
Viking Holdings Ltd VIK Peers
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $46.18 | +1.34% | 20.44B | 128.28 | $0.36 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,254.01 | +1.14% | 170.97B | 32.72 | $160.56 | +0.69% |
| ABNB | $138.05 | +2.86% | 86.48B | 35.04 | $3.94 | N/A |
| RCL | $247.77 | +2.31% | 67.28B | 20.16 | $12.29 | +0.71% |
| TCOM | $66.24 | +1.10% | 43.37B | 19.43 | $3.41 | +0.43% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.63B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $169.37 | +1.27% | 20.67B | 18.95 | $8.94 | +0.24% |
| MMYT | $106.59 | +2.76% | 11.70B | 56.10 | $1.90 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.33 | +0.94% | 8.64B | 10.98 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TNL | $51.02 | +1.33% | 3.39B | 9.28 | $5.50 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 170.97B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while BKNG trades at $5,254.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs ABNB Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86.48B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while ABNB trades at $138.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs RCL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 67.28B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while RCL trades at $247.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TCOM Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 43.37B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while TCOM trades at $66.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.63B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs EXPE Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 20.67B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while EXPE trades at $169.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MMYT Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while MMYT trades at $106.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NCLH Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while NCLH trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TNL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while TNL trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TRIP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while TRIP trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 391.75. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs DESP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while DESP trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -649.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while SABR trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs LIND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 577.17M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while LIND trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 168.60M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while MRNOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs YTRA Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 45.20M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while YTRA trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TOUR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 36.43M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while TOUR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MKGI Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs JXG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while JXG trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JXG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NTRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 3.88M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while NTRP trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MOND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 20.44B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87416.00. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $46.18, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 128.28, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.