Viking Holdings Ltd
Viking Holdings Ltd VIK Peers
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $48.78 | +1.78% | 21.6B | 65.03 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,614.61 | +0.79% | 182.7B | 35.00 | $160.43 | +0.81% |
| ABNB | $140.64 | +2.44% | 88.1B | 35.79 | $3.93 | N/A |
| RCL | $276.31 | +1.81% | 75B | 22.48 | $12.29 | +0.89% |
| TCOM | $60.59 | -2.24% | 39.6B | 17.82 | $3.40 | +0.46% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $176.55 | +1.83% | 21.5B | 21.07 | $8.38 | +0.45% |
| MMYT | $100.44 | +0.38% | 11B | 121.01 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.55 | +1.03% | 8.7B | 11.11 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TNL | $49.99 | +2.82% | 3.3B | 9.16 | $5.46 | +4.13% |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while BKNG trades at $5,614.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs ABNB Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while ABNB trades at $140.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs RCL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while RCL trades at $276.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TCOM Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while TCOM trades at $60.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs EXPE Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while EXPE trades at $176.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MMYT Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while MMYT trades at $100.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 121.01. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NCLH Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while NCLH trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TNL Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while TNL trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TRIP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while TRIP trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs DESP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs SABR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while SABR trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs LIND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 600.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while LIND trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -19.26. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while MRNOW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs YTRA Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while YTRA trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -47.89. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs TOUR Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while TOUR trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs NTRP Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while NTRP trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MKGI Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs JXG Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while JXG trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MOND Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.
VIK vs MONDW Comparison
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 21.6B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $48.78, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.03, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.