Tripadvisor, Inc.
Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIP | $18.03 | +0.00% | 2B | 36.71 | $0.48 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,484.77 | +0.00% | 176.8B | 38.07 | $143.28 | +0.67% |
| RCL | $312.30 | +0.00% | 85.3B | 23.34 | $13.45 | +0.78% |
| ABNB | $124.64 | +0.00% | 77.9B | 30.29 | $4.13 | N/A |
| TCOM | $60.31 | +0.00% | 42B | 18.29 | $3.41 | +0.45% |
| VIK | $60.02 | +0.00% | 26.9B | 82.01 | $0.74 | N/A |
| EXPE | $207.20 | +0.00% | 24.5B | 25.58 | $8.11 | +0.39% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $24.36 | +0.00% | 11B | 16.65 | $1.46 | N/A |
| MMYT | $94.33 | +0.01% | 9.4B | 114.66 | $0.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRIP vs BKNG Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 176.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while BKNG trades at $5,484.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check BKNG's competition here
TRIP vs RCL Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while RCL trades at $312.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check RCL's competition here
TRIP vs ABNB Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while ABNB trades at $124.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check ABNB's competition here
TRIP vs TCOM Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while TCOM trades at $60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TCOM's competition here
TRIP vs VIK Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while VIK trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 82.01. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check VIK's competition here
TRIP vs EXPE Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while EXPE trades at $207.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check EXPE's competition here
TRIP vs SABRP Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check SABRP's competition here
TRIP vs NCLH Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while NCLH trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check NCLH's competition here
TRIP vs MMYT Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while MMYT trades at $94.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 114.66. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MMYT's competition here
TRIP vs TNL Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while TNL trades at $60.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TNL's competition here
TRIP vs DESP Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check DESP's competition here
TRIP vs LIND Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 739.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while LIND trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check LIND's competition here
TRIP vs SABR Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while SABR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check SABR's competition here
TRIP vs MRNOW Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 484.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while MRNOW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MRNOW's competition here
TRIP vs YTRA Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while YTRA trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -127.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check YTRA's competition here
TRIP vs TOUR Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while TOUR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TOUR's competition here
TRIP vs NTRP Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while NTRP trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check NTRP's competition here
TRIP vs MKGI Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MKGI's competition here
TRIP vs JXG Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while JXG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check JXG's competition here
TRIP vs MOND Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOND's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MOND's competition here
TRIP vs MONDW Comparison August 2025
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 2B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $18.03, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 36.71, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MONDW's competition here