UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TIGR's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TIGR and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIGR | $5.04 | -0.10% | 900.7M | 7.41 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MS | $213.44 | -0.62% | 336.5B | 17.25 | $12.37 | +1.95% |
| MS-PP | $25.14 | +0.62% | 333.8B | 2.02 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PF | $25.29 | +0.08% | 333.2B | 2.03 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PE | $25.46 | +0.12% | 333.2B | 2.04 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PQ | $25.33 | -0.04% | 331.8B | 2.03 | $12.50 | +1.95% |
| MS-PO | $16.42 | -0.06% | 329.2B | 1.32 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| GS-PC | $19.12 | -0.10% | 328.7B | 0.29 | $65.55 | +1.66% |
| MS-PI | $24.43 | -0.45% | 326.4B | 1.96 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PK | $22.47 | -0.31% | 323.2B | 1.80 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
TIGR vs MS Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 336.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $213.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
TIGR vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 333.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
TIGR vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
TIGR vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
TIGR vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 331.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
TIGR vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 329.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PO's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
TIGR vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 328.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
TIGR vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
TIGR vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 323.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
TIGR vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 323B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PL's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
TIGR vs GS Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 302.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $1,025.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
TIGR vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
TIGR vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
TIGR vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 191B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $109.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
TIGR vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
TIGR vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
TIGR vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $104.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
TIGR vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
TIGR vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
TIGR vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
TIGR vs NMR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
TIGR vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $370.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
TIGR vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 65.45. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
TIGR vs TW Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check TW's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
TIGR vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $122.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
TIGR vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BMNR's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
TIGR vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check VIRT's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
TIGR vs EVR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $286.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check EVR's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
TIGR vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $98.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1152.71. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BMNP's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
TIGR vs JEF Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check JEF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
TIGR vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
TIGR vs XP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
TIGR vs HUT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $78.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check HUT's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
TIGR vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GLXY's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
TIGR vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SNEX's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
TIGR vs WULF Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check WULF's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
TIGR vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check RIOT's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
TIGR vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check FIGR's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
TIGR vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $162.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MKTX's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
TIGR vs BGC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BGC's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
TIGR vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
TIGR vs MRX Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MRX's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
TIGR vs MC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
TIGR vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
TIGR vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
TIGR vs MARA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
TIGR vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CLSKW's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
TIGR vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CLSK's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
TIGR vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check ETOR's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
TIGR vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BGCP's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
TIGR vs SBET Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SBET's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
TIGR vs PURR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check PURR's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
TIGR vs PWP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while PWP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check PWP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
TIGR vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
TIGR vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check HKIB's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
TIGR vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
TIGR vs OPY Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $118.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check OPY's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
TIGR vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
TIGR vs COWN Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check COWN's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
TIGR vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 877.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check LCLN's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
TIGR vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 798.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CSHR's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
TIGR vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BTGO's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
TIGR vs AC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check AC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
TIGR vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check ABTC's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
TIGR vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GEMI's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
TIGR vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BTBT's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
TIGR vs MFH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MFH's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
TIGR vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CNCK's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
TIGR vs GHL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GHL's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
TIGR vs CD Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CD's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
TIGR vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check FUFUW's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
TIGR vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 234M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check DEFT's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
TIGR vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check FUFU's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
TIGR vs BRR Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BRR's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
TIGR vs SWIN Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SWIN's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
TIGR vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 59.11. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BMHL's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
TIGR vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check NAKA's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
TIGR vs TOP Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -107.64. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check TOP's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
TIGR vs WTF Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check WTF's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
TIGR vs MTC Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MTC's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: AXG)
TIGR vs AXG Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AXG trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -157.75. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check AXG's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
TIGR vs CANG Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check CANG's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
TIGR vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SIEB's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
TIGR vs SRL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -46.15. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SRL's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
TIGR vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check TCJH's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
TIGR vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GRDI's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
TIGR vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check BTCS's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
TIGR vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
TIGR vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
TIGR vs GREE Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
TIGR vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
TIGR vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check HGBL's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
TIGR vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while PLUT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check PLUT's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
TIGR vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check SDIG's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
TIGR vs COHN Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while COHN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check COHN's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
TIGR vs MATH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MATH trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MATH's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
TIGR vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GRAN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is more volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check GRAN's competition here
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC Class A common (NASDAQ: MDBH)
TIGR vs MDBH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MDBH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check MDBH's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
TIGR vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIGR stands at 900.7M. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIGR is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ATCH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TIGR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIGR is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIGR.Check ATCH's competition here