Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See NMR's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for NMR and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMR | $10.30 | +1.78% | 30.1B | 11.97 | $0.86 | +3.15% |
| MS | $214.77 | -0.04% | 338.7B | 17.36 | $12.37 | +1.93% |
| MS-PE | $25.43 | -0.08% | 333.2B | 2.04 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
| MS-PF | $25.27 | +0.04% | 333.2B | 2.03 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
| MS-PQ | $25.34 | -0.63% | 332B | 2.03 | $12.50 | +1.93% |
| MS-PP | $24.99 | -0.52% | 331.3B | 2.00 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
| GS-PC | $19.14 | +0.05% | 329.4B | 0.29 | $65.55 | +1.64% |
| MS-PI | $24.54 | -0.12% | 328.7B | 1.97 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
| MS-PO | $16.41 | -0.06% | 328.2B | 1.32 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
| MS-PL | $18.87 | -0.16% | 324.4B | 1.51 | $12.47 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
NMR vs MS Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 338.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS trades at $214.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
NMR vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PE trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
NMR vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PF trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
NMR vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 332B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PQ trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
NMR vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 331.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PP's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
NMR vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 329.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS-PC trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
NMR vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 328.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PI trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
NMR vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 328.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PO trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
NMR vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 324.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PL trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
NMR vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 324.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PK trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PK's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
NMR vs GS Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 304.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS trades at $1,033.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
NMR vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 199.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS-PD trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
NMR vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS-PA trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
NMR vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 191.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SCHW trades at $110.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
NMR vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
NMR vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PD trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
NMR vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while HOOD trades at $104.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
NMR vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
NMR vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MS-PA trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
NMR vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GS-PK's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
NMR vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while LPLA trades at $370.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
NMR vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CRCL trades at $87.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 59.68. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
NMR vs TW Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while TW trades at $108.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check TW's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
NMR vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while FUTU trades at $124.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check FUTU's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
NMR vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while VIRT trades at $66.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check VIRT's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
NMR vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BMNR trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BMNR's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
NMR vs EVR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while EVR trades at $290.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check EVR's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
NMR vs JEF Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while JEF trades at $53.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check JEF's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
NMR vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BMNP trades at $96.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1133.76. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BMNP's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
NMR vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
NMR vs XP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while XP trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
NMR vs HUT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while HUT trades at $79.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check HUT's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
NMR vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SNEX trades at $68.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SNEX's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
NMR vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GLXY trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -42.98. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GLXY's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
NMR vs WULF Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while WULF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check WULF's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
NMR vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check RIOT's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
NMR vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while FIGR trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check FIGR's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
NMR vs BGC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BGC trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BGC's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
NMR vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MKTX trades at $162.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MKTX's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
NMR vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
NMR vs MRX Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MRX trades at $72.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MRX's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
NMR vs MC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MC trades at $68.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
NMR vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while LAZ trades at $43.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
NMR vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MIAX trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
NMR vs MARA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MARA trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
NMR vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CLSKW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CLSKW's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
NMR vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CLSK trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CLSK's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
NMR vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while ETOR trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check ETOR's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
NMR vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BGCP's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
NMR vs PWP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while PWP trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check PWP's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
NMR vs SBET Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SBET trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SBET's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
NMR vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CIFRW's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
NMR vs PURR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while PURR trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check PURR's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
NMR vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check HKIB's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
NMR vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GOLD trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
NMR vs OPY Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while OPY trades at $119.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check OPY's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
NMR vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
NMR vs COWN Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check COWN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
NMR vs TIGR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 901.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while TIGR trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check TIGR's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
NMR vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 866M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while LCLN trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check LCLN's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
NMR vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 788M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CSHR trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CSHR's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
NMR vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 734.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BTGO trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BTGO's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
NMR vs AC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check AC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
NMR vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 560.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while ABTC trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check ABTC's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
NMR vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GEMI trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GEMI's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
NMR vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BTBT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BTBT's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
NMR vs MFH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MFH's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
NMR vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CNCK trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CNCK's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
NMR vs GHL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GHL's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
NMR vs CD Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CD trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CD's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
NMR vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while DEFT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check DEFT's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
NMR vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while FUFUW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check FUFUW's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
NMR vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while FUFU trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check FUFU's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
NMR vs BRR Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BRR trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BRR's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
NMR vs SWIN Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SWIN's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
NMR vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 153.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BMHL trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BMHL's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
NMR vs WTF Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while WTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check WTF's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
NMR vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while NAKA trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check NAKA's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
NMR vs TOP Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while TOP trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -108.28. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check TOP's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: AXG)
NMR vs AXG Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while AXG trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -157.04. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check AXG's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
NMR vs MTC Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MTC trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MTC's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
NMR vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SIEB trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SIEB's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
NMR vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check TCJH's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
NMR vs SRL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SRL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -45.88. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SRL's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
NMR vs CANG Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while CANG trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check CANG's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
NMR vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GRDI's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
NMR vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while BTCS trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check BTCS's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
NMR vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while NCTY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
NMR vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while DOMH trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
NMR vs GREE Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
NMR vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
NMR vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while HGBL trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check HGBL's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
NMR vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while PLUT trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check PLUT's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
NMR vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check SDIG's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
NMR vs MATH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MATH trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MATH's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
NMR vs COHN Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while COHN trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check COHN's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
NMR vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while GRAN trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check GRAN's competition here
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC Class A common (NASDAQ: MDBH)
NMR vs MDBH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while MDBH trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check MDBH's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
NMR vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMR stands at 30.1B. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMR is priced at $10.30 on the NYSE, while ATCH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMR currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NMR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMR is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMR.Check ATCH's competition here