CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CLSKW's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CLSKW and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSKW | $0.19 | -12.00% | 1.9B | -0.05 | -$3.76 | N/A |
| GS-PC | $19.53 | -0.36% | 336.1B | 0.28 | $69.55 | +2.05% |
| MS-PL | $17.70 | +0.08% | 285.7B | 1.42 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
| MS-PK | $20.65 | +0.05% | 284.8B | 1.65 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
| MS | $180.54 | -0.86% | 284.7B | 14.59 | $12.37 | +2.30% |
| MS-PI | $22.43 | -0.31% | 284.4B | 1.80 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
| MS-PO | $15.17 | -1.37% | 284.3B | 1.22 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
| MS-PQ | $24.02 | -0.46% | 284.2B | 1.92 | $12.50 | +2.30% |
| MS-PE | $24.80 | +0.00% | 284.1B | 1.99 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
| MS-PF | $24.23 | +0.04% | 283.9B | 1.95 | $12.47 | +2.30% |
Stock Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
CLSKW vs GS-PC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 336.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
CLSKW vs MS-PL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 285.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
CLSKW vs MS-PK Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 284.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
CLSKW vs MS Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 284.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $180.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
CLSKW vs MS-PI Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 284.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
CLSKW vs MS-PO Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 284.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
CLSKW vs MS-PQ Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 284.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
CLSKW vs MS-PE Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 284.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
CLSKW vs MS-PF Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 283.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
CLSKW vs MS-PP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 283.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PP's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
CLSKW vs GS Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $881.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
CLSKW vs GS-PD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
CLSKW vs GS-PA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 198.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
CLSKW vs SCHW Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 159B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $91.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
CLSKW vs SCHW-PJ Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
CLSKW vs SCHW-PD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 158.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
CLSKW vs HOOD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $98.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
CLSKW vs GS-PJ Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
CLSKW vs MS-PA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
CLSKW vs GS-PK Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
CLSKW vs NMR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
CLSKW vs LPLA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $320.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check LPLA's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
CLSKW vs TW Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $113.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check TW's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
CLSKW vs CRCL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $82.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CRCL's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
CLSKW vs XP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check XP's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
CLSKW vs FUTU Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $105.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
CLSKW vs BMNP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $96.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1140.12. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BMNP's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
CLSKW vs VIRT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check VIRT's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
CLSKW vs BMNR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BMNR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PB)
CLSKW vs SF-PB Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SF-PB trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SF-PB's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp (NYSE: SF)
CLSKW vs SF Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SF trades at $67.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SF's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
CLSKW vs EVR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $254.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check EVR's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
CLSKW vs SCE-PJ Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
CLSKW vs JEF Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check JEF's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
CLSKW vs HUT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check HUT's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
CLSKW vs SNEX Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SNEX's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
CLSKW vs WULF Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check WULF's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
CLSKW vs MKTX Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $164.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MKTX's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
CLSKW vs BGC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BGC's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
CLSKW vs GLXY Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GLXY's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
CLSKW vs RJF-PA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
CLSKW vs RIOT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check RIOT's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
CLSKW vs MRX Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MRX's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
CLSKW vs FIGR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check FIGR's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
CLSKW vs MC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
CLSKW vs LAZ Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
CLSKW vs MIAX Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
CLSKW vs MARA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
CLSKW vs CLSK Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CLSK's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PC)
CLSKW vs SF-PC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SF-PC trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SF-PC's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
CLSKW vs ETOR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check ETOR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047 (NYSE: SFB)
CLSKW vs SFB Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SFB trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SFB's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
CLSKW vs BGCP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BGCP's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
CLSKW vs TOP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check TOP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
CLSKW vs CIFRW Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
CLSKW vs HKIB Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check HKIB's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
CLSKW vs SBET Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SBET's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PD)
CLSKW vs SF-PD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SF-PD trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SF-PD's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
CLSKW vs PWP Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while PWP trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check PWP's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
CLSKW vs PURR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check PURR's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
CLSKW vs AMRK Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check AMRK's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
CLSKW vs GOLD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GOLD's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
CLSKW vs COWN Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check COWN's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
CLSKW vs OPY Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $100.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check OPY's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
CLSKW vs LCLN Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 838.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check LCLN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
CLSKW vs TIGR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 728.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while TIGR trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check TIGR's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
CLSKW vs AC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check AC's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
CLSKW vs BTGO Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 637.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BTGO's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
CLSKW vs MTC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MTC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
CLSKW vs ABTC Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check ABTC's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
CLSKW vs CD Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 551.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -173.50. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CD's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
CLSKW vs CSHR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 511.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CSHR's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
CLSKW vs GEMI Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GEMI's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
CLSKW vs MFH Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MFH's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
CLSKW vs BRR Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BRR's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
CLSKW vs BTBT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BTBT's competition here
Silvia, Inc. (NASDAQ: SVIA)
CLSKW vs SVIA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVIA has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SVIA trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SVIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SVIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SVIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SVIA's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
CLSKW vs GHL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GHL's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
CLSKW vs FUFUW Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check FUFUW's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
CLSKW vs CNCK Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CNCK's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
CLSKW vs DEFT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check DEFT's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
CLSKW vs SWIN Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SWIN's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
CLSKW vs FUFU Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check FUFU's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
CLSKW vs NAKA Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check NAKA's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
CLSKW vs CANG Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check CANG's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
CLSKW vs WTF Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to WTF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check WTF's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
CLSKW vs TCJH Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check TCJH's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
CLSKW vs BMHL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 64.05. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BMHL's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
CLSKW vs SIEB Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -62.90. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SIEB's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
CLSKW vs SRL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SRL's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
CLSKW vs GRDI Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GRDI's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
CLSKW vs BTCS Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check BTCS's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
CLSKW vs GREE Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check GREE's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
CLSKW vs NCTY Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check NCTY's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
CLSKW vs MATH Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while MATH trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check MATH's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
CLSKW vs ADEX-WT Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
CLSKW vs DOMH Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check DOMH's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
CLSKW vs HGBL Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check HGBL's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
CLSKW vs SDIG Comparison October 2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLSKW stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CLSKW is priced at $0.19 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLSKW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CLSKW's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CLSKW is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLSKW.Check SDIG's competition here