Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PWP's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PWP and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWP | $16.63 | -2.06% | 1.6B | 37.80 | $0.44 | +1.67% |
| MS | $213.44 | -0.62% | 336.5B | 17.25 | $12.37 | +1.95% |
| MS-PP | $25.14 | +0.62% | 333.8B | 2.02 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PF | $25.29 | +0.08% | 333.2B | 2.03 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PE | $25.46 | +0.12% | 333.2B | 2.04 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PQ | $25.33 | -0.04% | 331.8B | 2.03 | $12.50 | +1.95% |
| MS-PO | $16.42 | -0.06% | 329.2B | 1.32 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| GS-PC | $19.12 | -0.10% | 328.7B | 0.29 | $65.55 | +1.66% |
| MS-PI | $24.43 | -0.45% | 326.4B | 1.96 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PK | $22.47 | -0.31% | 323.2B | 1.80 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
PWP vs MS Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 336.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $213.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
PWP vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 333.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
PWP vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
PWP vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
PWP vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 331.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
PWP vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 329.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PO's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
PWP vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 328.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
PWP vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
PWP vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 323.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
PWP vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 323B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PL's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
PWP vs GS Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 302.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $1,025.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
PWP vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
PWP vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
PWP vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 191B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $109.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
PWP vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
PWP vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
PWP vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $104.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
PWP vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
PWP vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
PWP vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
PWP vs NMR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
PWP vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $370.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
PWP vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 65.45. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
PWP vs TW Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check TW's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
PWP vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $122.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
PWP vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BMNR's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
PWP vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check VIRT's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
PWP vs EVR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $286.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check EVR's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
PWP vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $98.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1152.71. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BMNP's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
PWP vs JEF Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check JEF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
PWP vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
PWP vs XP Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
PWP vs HUT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $78.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check HUT's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
PWP vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GLXY's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
PWP vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SNEX's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
PWP vs WULF Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check WULF's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
PWP vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check RIOT's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
PWP vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check FIGR's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
PWP vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $162.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MKTX's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
PWP vs BGC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BGC's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
PWP vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
PWP vs MRX Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MRX's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
PWP vs MC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
PWP vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
PWP vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
PWP vs MARA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
PWP vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CLSKW's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
PWP vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CLSK's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
PWP vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check ETOR's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
PWP vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BGCP's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
PWP vs SBET Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SBET's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
PWP vs PURR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check PURR's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
PWP vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
PWP vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check HKIB's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
PWP vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
PWP vs OPY Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $118.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check OPY's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
PWP vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
PWP vs COWN Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check COWN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
PWP vs TIGR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while TIGR trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check TIGR's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
PWP vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 877.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check LCLN's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
PWP vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 798.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CSHR's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
PWP vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BTGO's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
PWP vs AC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check AC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
PWP vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check ABTC's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
PWP vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GEMI's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
PWP vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BTBT's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
PWP vs MFH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MFH's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
PWP vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CNCK's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
PWP vs GHL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GHL's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
PWP vs CD Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CD's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
PWP vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check FUFUW's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
PWP vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 234M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check DEFT's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
PWP vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check FUFU's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
PWP vs BRR Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BRR's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
PWP vs SWIN Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SWIN's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
PWP vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 59.11. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BMHL's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
PWP vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check NAKA's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
PWP vs TOP Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -107.64. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check TOP's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
PWP vs WTF Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check WTF's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
PWP vs MTC Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MTC's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: AXG)
PWP vs AXG Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while AXG trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -157.75. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check AXG's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
PWP vs CANG Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check CANG's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
PWP vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SIEB's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
PWP vs SRL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -46.15. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SRL's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
PWP vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check TCJH's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
PWP vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GRDI's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
PWP vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check BTCS's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
PWP vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
PWP vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
PWP vs GREE Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
PWP vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
PWP vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check HGBL's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
PWP vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while PLUT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check PLUT's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
PWP vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check SDIG's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
PWP vs COHN Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while COHN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check COHN's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
PWP vs MATH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MATH trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MATH's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
PWP vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while GRAN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check GRAN's competition here
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC Class A common (NASDAQ: MDBH)
PWP vs MDBH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while MDBH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check MDBH's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
PWP vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWP stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWP is priced at $16.63 on the NASDAQ, while ATCH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.80, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PWP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWP is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWP.Check ATCH's competition here