Stifel Financial Corp.
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | $74.81 | -0.29% | 11.4B | 14.49 | $5.13 | +2.11% |
| MS | $191.87 | -1.37% | 303.6B | 17.45 | $11.03 | +2.07% |
| GS | $948.68 | -2.09% | 279.9B | 17.33 | $54.75 | +1.62% |
| GS-PD | $19.09 | -0.91% | 203.5B | 0.37 | $51.53 | +1.62% |
| GS-PA | $19.51 | -1.14% | 201.9B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.62% |
| SCHW | $92.56 | +3.49% | 158.1B | 18.07 | $5.03 | +1.30% |
| MS-PA | $19.67 | -0.37% | 69.6B | 2.51 | $7.86 | +2.07% |
| HOOD | $76.57 | -5.11% | 69.5B | 37.45 | $2.06 | N/A |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.62% |
| MS-PI | $25.06 | -0.16% | 66.8B | 3.19 | $7.86 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
SF vs MS Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 303.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS trades at $191.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS's competition here
SF vs GS Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 279.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS trades at $948.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS's competition here
SF vs GS-PD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS-PD trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PD's competition here
SF vs GS-PA Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS-PA trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PA's competition here
SF vs SCHW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SCHW trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW's competition here
SF vs MS-PA Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PA trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PA's competition here
SF vs HOOD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while HOOD trades at $76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HOOD's competition here
SF vs GS-PJ Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PJ's competition here
SF vs MS-PI Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PI trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PI's competition here
SF vs MS-PF Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PF trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PF's competition here
SF vs MS-PK Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PK trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PK's competition here
SF vs GS-PK Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PK's competition here
SF vs MS-PE Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PE trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PE's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
SF vs MS-PQ Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PQ trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PQ's competition here
SF vs MS-PP Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PP trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PP's competition here
SF vs MS-PL Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PL trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PL's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PJ Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SCHW-PJ trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
SF vs CRCL Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while CRCL trades at $108.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -495.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CRCL's competition here
SF vs RJF Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while RJF trades at $155.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF's competition here
SF vs MS-PO Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MS-PO trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PO's competition here
SF vs LPLA Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while LPLA trades at $300.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LPLA's competition here
SF vs TW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while TW trades at $112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TW's competition here
SF vs NMR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while NMR trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NMR's competition here
SF vs STRD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while STRD trades at $75.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check STRD's competition here
SF vs IREN Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while IREN trades at $49.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check IREN's competition here
SF vs FUTU Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while FUTU trades at $132.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUTU's competition here
SF vs EVR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while EVR trades at $335.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check EVR's competition here
SF vs HUT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while HUT trades at $95.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -36.34. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HUT's competition here
SF vs VIRT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while VIRT trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check VIRT's competition here
SF vs JEF Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while JEF trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check JEF's competition here
SF vs HLI Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while HLI trades at $153.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HLI's competition here
SF vs GLXY Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GLXY trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -123.37. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GLXY's competition here
SF vs SCE-PJ Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
SF vs XP Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while XP trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check XP's competition here
SF vs WULF Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while WULF trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WULF's competition here
SF vs BMNR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BMNR trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BMNR's competition here
SF vs RIOT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while RIOT trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RIOT's competition here
SF vs SNEX Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SNEX trades at $112.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SNEX's competition here
SF vs FRHC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while FRHC trades at $143.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 14002.00. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FRHC's competition here
SF vs CIFR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while CIFR trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFR's competition here
SF vs FIGR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while FIGR trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FIGR's competition here
SF vs GS-PC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GS-PC trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PC's competition here
SF vs GSIW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GSIW trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GSIW's competition here
SF vs PIPR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while PIPR trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PIPR's competition here
SF vs RJF-PA Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PA's competition here
SF vs MIAX Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MIAX trades at $55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MIAX's competition here
SF vs BGC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BGC trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGC's competition here
SF vs MKTX Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MKTX trades at $141.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MKTX's competition here
SF vs MARA Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MARA trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MARA's competition here
SF vs MC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MC trades at $64.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MC's competition here
SF vs LAZ Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while LAZ trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LAZ's competition here
SF vs PJT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while PJT trades at $158.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PJT's competition here
SF vs MRX Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MRX trades at $56.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MRX's competition here
SF vs SF-PB Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SF-PB trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PB's competition here
SF vs ETOR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while ETOR trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ETOR's competition here
SF vs SF-PC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SF-PC trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PC's competition here
SF vs BGCP Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGCP's competition here
SF vs PWP Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while PWP trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 73.32. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PWP's competition here
SF vs SF-PD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SF-PD trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PD's competition here
SF vs CIFRW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFRW's competition here
SF vs HKIB Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HKIB's competition here
SF vs SBET Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SBET trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SBET's competition here
SF vs BITF Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BITF's competition here
SF vs AMRK Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AMRK's competition here
SF vs GOLD Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GOLD trades at $39.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GOLD's competition here
SF vs TIGR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while TIGR trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TIGR's competition here
SF vs COWN Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check COWN's competition here
SF vs ABTC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while ABTC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ABTC's competition here
SF vs OPY Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while OPY trades at $95.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check OPY's competition here
SF vs DFIN Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while DFIN trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DFIN's competition here
SF vs GEMI Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 679.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GEMI trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GEMI's competition here
SF vs AC Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AC's competition here
SF vs BTBT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 589.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BTBT trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTBT's competition here
SF vs BASG Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BASG has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BASG trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BASG's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BASG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BASG's competition here
SF vs RJF-PB Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while RJF-PB trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PB's competition here
SF vs MFH Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MFH's competition here
SF vs CSHR Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while CSHR trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CSHR's competition here
SF vs BTGO Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 378.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BTGO trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -68.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTGO's competition here
SF vs FUFU Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 333.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while FUFU trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUFU's competition here
SF vs GHL Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GHL's competition here
SF vs DEFT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 231.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while DEFT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DEFT's competition here
SF vs BASV Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BASV has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BASV trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BASV's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BASV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BASV's competition here
SF vs SWIN Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SWIN's competition here
SF vs AXG Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while AXG trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -17.14. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AXG's competition here
SF vs WHG Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while WHG trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WHG's competition here
SF vs SUIG Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SUIG trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SUIG's competition here
SF vs SRL Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SRL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SRL's competition here
SF vs BTCS Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while BTCS trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTCS's competition here
SF vs TCJH Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TCJH's competition here
SF vs SIEB Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SIEB trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SIEB's competition here
SF vs GRDI Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GRDI's competition here
SF vs NVDW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NVDW has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while NVDW trades at $42.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas NVDW's P/E ratio is 90.98. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVDW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to NVDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NVDW's competition here
SF vs TSLW Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TSLW has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while TSLW trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TSLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSLW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TSLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TSLW's competition here
SF vs ADEX-WT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
SF vs PLUT Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while PLUT trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PLUT's competition here
SF vs DOMH Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while DOMH trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DOMH's competition here
SF vs SDIG Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SDIG's competition here
SF vs HGBL Comparison May 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $74.81, while HGBL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HGBL's competition here