Stifel Financial Corp.
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | $78.01 | +1.46% | 11.9B | 15.02 | $5.14 | +2.03% |
| MS | $189.20 | +0.29% | 298.6B | 17.03 | $11.04 | +2.10% |
| GS | $935.49 | +0.45% | 275.1B | 16.94 | $54.72 | +1.68% |
| GS-PD | $19.04 | -1.60% | 202.9B | 0.37 | $51.53 | +1.68% |
| GS-PA | $19.29 | -1.83% | 199.5B | 0.37 | $51.53 | +1.68% |
| SCHW | $90.05 | +1.27% | 155.1B | 17.59 | $5.03 | +1.27% |
| HOOD | $84.48 | +1.12% | 76.3B | 41.32 | $2.05 | N/A |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.68% |
| MS-PA | $19.43 | +0.15% | 68.5B | 2.48 | $7.86 | +2.10% |
| MS-PI | $25.11 | +0.04% | 67B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
SF vs MS Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS trades at $189.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS's competition here
SF vs GS Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 275.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS trades at $935.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS's competition here
SF vs GS-PD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 202.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS-PD trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PD's competition here
SF vs GS-PA Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 199.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS-PA trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PA's competition here
SF vs SCHW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SCHW trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW's competition here
SF vs HOOD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while HOOD trades at $84.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HOOD's competition here
SF vs GS-PJ Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PJ's competition here
SF vs MS-PA Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PA trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PA's competition here
SF vs MS-PI Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PI trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PI's competition here
SF vs MS-PK Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PK trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PK's competition here
SF vs MS-PF Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PF trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PF's competition here
SF vs GS-PK Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PK's competition here
SF vs MS-PE Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PE's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
SF vs MS-PQ Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PQ trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PQ's competition here
SF vs MS-PP Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PP trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PP's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PJ Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
SF vs MS-PL Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PL trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PL's competition here
SF vs RJF Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while RJF trades at $155.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF's competition here
SF vs MS-PO Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MS-PO trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PO's competition here
SF vs CRCL Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while CRCL trades at $98.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -226.45. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CRCL's competition here
SF vs LPLA Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while LPLA trades at $324.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LPLA's competition here
SF vs TW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while TW trades at $113.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TW's competition here
SF vs NMR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while NMR trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NMR's competition here
SF vs FUTU Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while FUTU trades at $159.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUTU's competition here
SF vs STRD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while STRD trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check STRD's competition here
SF vs IREN Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while IREN trades at $49.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check IREN's competition here
SF vs EVR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while EVR trades at $346.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check EVR's competition here
SF vs HLI Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while HLI trades at $159.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HLI's competition here
SF vs VIRT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while VIRT trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check VIRT's competition here
SF vs XP Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while XP trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check XP's competition here
SF vs BMNR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BMNR trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BMNR's competition here
SF vs JEF Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while JEF trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check JEF's competition here
SF vs SCE-PJ Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
SF vs FRHC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while FRHC trades at $150.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 7405.50. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FRHC's competition here
SF vs WULF Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while WULF trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WULF's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WULF's competition here
SF vs GLXY Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GLXY trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -42.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GLXY's competition here
SF vs HUT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while HUT trades at $75.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -35.91. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HUT's competition here
SF vs SNEX Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SNEX trades at $106.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SNEX's competition here
SF vs GS-PC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GS-PC trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PC's competition here
SF vs CIFR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while CIFR trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFR's competition here
SF vs RIOT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while RIOT trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RIOT's competition here
SF vs GSIW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GSIW trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GSIW's competition here
SF vs MKTX Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MKTX trades at $163.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MKTX's competition here
SF vs FIGR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while FIGR trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 73.10. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FIGR's competition here
SF vs BGC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BGC trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGC's competition here
SF vs RJF-PA Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PA's competition here
SF vs MC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MC trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MC's competition here
SF vs LAZ Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while LAZ trades at $48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LAZ's competition here
SF vs MARA Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MARA trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MARA's competition here
SF vs MIAX Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MIAX trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is -45.88. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MIAX's competition here
SF vs MRX Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MRX trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MRX's competition here
SF vs PJT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while PJT trades at $154.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PJT's competition here
SF vs SF-PB Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SF-PB trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PB's competition here
SF vs ETOR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while ETOR trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ETOR's competition here
SF vs SF-PC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SF-PC trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PC's competition here
SF vs PWP Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while PWP trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PWP's competition here
SF vs BGCP Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGCP's competition here
SF vs SF-PD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SF-PD trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PD's competition here
SF vs CIFRW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFRW's competition here
SF vs PIPR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while PIPR trades at $87.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PIPR's competition here
SF vs HKIB Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HKIB's competition here
SF vs SBET Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SBET trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SBET's competition here
SF vs DFIN Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while DFIN trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DFIN's competition here
SF vs BITF Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BITF's competition here
SF vs TIGR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while TIGR trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TIGR's competition here
SF vs GOLD Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GOLD trades at $46.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 97.96. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GOLD's competition here
SF vs AMRK Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AMRK's competition here
SF vs ABTC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while ABTC trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ABTC's competition here
SF vs COWN Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check COWN's competition here
SF vs OPY Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while OPY trades at $107.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check OPY's competition here
SF vs AC Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AC's competition here
SF vs GEMI Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GEMI trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -18.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GEMI's competition here
SF vs BTBT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BTBT trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTBT's competition here
SF vs RJF-PB Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 440.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while RJF-PB trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PB's competition here
SF vs BASG Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BASG has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BASG trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BASG's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BASG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BASG's competition here
SF vs BTGO Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BTGO trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -82.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTGO's competition here
SF vs MFH Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MFH's competition here
SF vs CSHR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 359.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while CSHR trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CSHR's competition here
SF vs FUFU Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while FUFU trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUFU's competition here
SF vs GHL Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GHL's competition here
SF vs DEFT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 262.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while DEFT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DEFT's competition here
SF vs BASV Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BASV has a market cap of 202.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BASV trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BASV's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BASV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BASV's competition here
SF vs AXG Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while AXG trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AXG's competition here
SF vs BRR Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BRR trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BRR's competition here
SF vs SWIN Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SWIN's competition here
SF vs WHG Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while WHG trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WHG's competition here
SF vs SUIG Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SUIG trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SUIG's competition here
SF vs SRL Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SRL trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SRL's competition here
SF vs BTCS Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while BTCS trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTCS's competition here
SF vs TCJH Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TCJH's competition here
SF vs CLSKW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while CLSKW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CLSKW's competition here
SF vs SIEB Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while SIEB trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SIEB's competition here
SF vs GRDI Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GRDI's competition here
SF vs NVDW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NVDW has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while NVDW trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas NVDW's P/E ratio is 85.11. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVDW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to NVDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NVDW's competition here
SF vs TSLW Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TSLW has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while TSLW trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas TSLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSLW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TSLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TSLW's competition here
SF vs PROP Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while PROP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PROP's competition here
SF vs HGBL Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while HGBL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HGBL's competition here
SF vs ADEX-WT Comparison April 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $78.01, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.02, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ADEX-WT's competition here