Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MATH's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MATH and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATH | $1.01 | +0.00% | 42.7M | -5.33 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| GS-PC | $19.49 | +0.46% | 336B | 0.30 | $65.55 | +1.88% |
| MS-PE | $25.57 | +0.27% | 334.9B | 2.05 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
| MS-PF | $25.35 | +0.04% | 334.1B | 2.03 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
| MS-PP | $24.96 | +0.32% | 330.8B | 2.00 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
| MS-PQ | $25.23 | +0.16% | 330.5B | 2.02 | $12.50 | +2.01% |
| MS | $206.13 | +1.75% | 325.2B | 16.67 | $12.37 | +2.01% |
| MS-PO | $16.17 | +0.43% | 323.4B | 1.30 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
| MS-PI | $24.14 | +0.04% | 323B | 1.94 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
| MS-PL | $18.61 | -0.11% | 319.9B | 1.49 | $12.47 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
MATH vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 336B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
MATH vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 334.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
MATH vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 334.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
MATH vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 330.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
MATH vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 330.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
MATH vs MS Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 325.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $206.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
MATH vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 323.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
MATH vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 323B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
MATH vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 319.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
MATH vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 318.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PK's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
MATH vs GS Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 283.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $959.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
MATH vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
MATH vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 198.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
MATH vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $106.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
MATH vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 173.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
MATH vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
MATH vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $123.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 54.32. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
MATH vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
MATH vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
MATH vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
MATH vs NMR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
MATH vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $332.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
MATH vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $94.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 64.72. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
MATH vs TW Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $104.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TW's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
MATH vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BMNR's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
MATH vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $114.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FUTU's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
MATH vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $57.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VIRT's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
MATH vs HUT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $103.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HUT's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
MATH vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1164.59. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BMNP's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
MATH vs XP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XP's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
MATH vs EVR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $269.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check EVR's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
MATH vs JEF Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JEF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
MATH vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
MATH vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check RIOT's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
MATH vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -48.28. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GLXY's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
MATH vs WULF Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check WULF's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
MATH vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $67.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SNEX's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
MATH vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FIGR's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
MATH vs BGC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BGC's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
MATH vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $163.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MKTX's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
MATH vs MRX Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MRX's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
MATH vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
MATH vs MARA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MARA's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
MATH vs MC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $60.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MC's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
MATH vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CLSK's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
MATH vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CLSKW's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
MATH vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MIAX's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
MATH vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LAZ's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
MATH vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETOR's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
MATH vs SBET Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SBET's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
MATH vs PURR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PURR's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
MATH vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BGCP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
MATH vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
MATH vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HKIB's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
MATH vs PWP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while PWP trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PWP's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
MATH vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $43.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
MATH vs OPY Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $119.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check OPY's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
MATH vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
MATH vs COWN Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check COWN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
MATH vs TIGR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 873.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while TIGR trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TIGR's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
MATH vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LCLN's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
MATH vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 841.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTGO's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
MATH vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CSHR's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
MATH vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 751M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ABTC's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
MATH vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 731.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GEMI's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
MATH vs AC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AC's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
MATH vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 635.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTBT's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
MATH vs MFH Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MFH's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
MATH vs BRR Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BRR's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
MATH vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 363.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FUFUW's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
MATH vs CD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CD's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
MATH vs GHL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GHL's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
MATH vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CNCK's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
MATH vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FUFU's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
MATH vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DEFT's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
MATH vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check NAKA's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
MATH vs MTC Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MTC's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
MATH vs SWIN Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SWIN's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
MATH vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 53.60. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BMHL's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
MATH vs WTF Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check WTF's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
MATH vs TOP Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -97.99. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TOP's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
MATH vs CANG Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CANG's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
MATH vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -71.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SIEB's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
MATH vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TCJH's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
MATH vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTCS's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
MATH vs SRL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -37.69. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SRL's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: AXG)
MATH vs AXG Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while AXG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -126.06. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AXG's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
MATH vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GRDI's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
MATH vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
MATH vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
MATH vs GREE Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
MATH vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
MATH vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HGBL's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
MATH vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SDIG's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
MATH vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while PLUT trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PLUT's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
MATH vs COHN Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while COHN trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check COHN's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
MATH vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while ATCH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ATCH's competition here
Fold Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLD)
MATH vs FLD Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FLD has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while FLD trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas FLD's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLD's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLD's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
MATH vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $1.01 on the NASDAQ, while GRAN trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -5.33, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -109.50. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GRAN's competition here