Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT | $119.52 | +6.49% | 13.5B | -42.41 | -$2.82 | N/A |
| MS | $214.21 | +1.08% | 334.7B | 19.22 | $11.04 | +1.88% |
| GS | $1,052.63 | +1.34% | 308.5B | 19.10 | $54.74 | +1.63% |
| GS-PD | $19.18 | +0.24% | 204.1B | 0.37 | $51.53 | +1.63% |
| GS-PA | $19.40 | -0.31% | 200.6B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.63% |
| SCHW | $88.12 | -0.81% | 153.2B | 17.51 | $5.03 | +1.34% |
| HOOD | $87.01 | +5.51% | 76.6B | 41.28 | $2.06 | N/A |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.63% |
| MS-PA | $19.47 | +0.21% | 68.5B | 2.48 | $7.86 | +1.88% |
| MS-PI | $24.98 | -0.16% | 66.6B | 3.18 | $7.86 | +1.88% |
Stock Comparison
HUT vs MS Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 334.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS trades at $214.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS's competition here
HUT vs GS Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 308.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS trades at $1,052.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS's competition here
HUT vs GS-PD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS-PD trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PD's competition here
HUT vs GS-PA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 200.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS-PA trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PA's competition here
HUT vs SCHW Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SCHW trades at $88.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW's competition here
HUT vs HOOD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while HOOD trades at $87.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HOOD's competition here
HUT vs GS-PJ Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PJ's competition here
HUT vs MS-PA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PA trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PA's competition here
HUT vs MS-PI Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PI trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PI's competition here
HUT vs MS-PF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PF trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PF's competition here
HUT vs MS-PE Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PE trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PE's competition here
HUT vs GS-PK Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PK's competition here
HUT vs MS-PK Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PK trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PK's competition here
HUT vs SCHW-PD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
HUT vs MS-PQ Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PQ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PQ's competition here
HUT vs MS-PP Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PP's competition here
HUT vs SCHW-PJ Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SCHW-PJ trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
HUT vs MS-PL Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PL trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PL's competition here
HUT vs RJF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while RJF trades at $151.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RJF's competition here
HUT vs MS-PO Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MS-PO trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PO's competition here
HUT vs NMR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while NMR trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check NMR's competition here
HUT vs LPLA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while LPLA trades at $289.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LPLA's competition here
HUT vs CRCL Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while CRCL trades at $86.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -358.65. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CRCL's competition here
HUT vs IREN Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while IREN trades at $58.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 76.87. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check IREN's competition here
HUT vs TW Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while TW trades at $98.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TW's competition here
HUT vs STRD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while STRD trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check STRD's competition here
HUT vs EVR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while EVR trades at $351.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check EVR's competition here
HUT vs WULF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while WULF trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check WULF's competition here
HUT vs FUTU Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while FUTU trades at $93.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FUTU's competition here
HUT vs JEF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while JEF trades at $59.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check JEF's competition here
HUT vs VIRT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while VIRT trades at $54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check VIRT's competition here
HUT vs SF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SF trades at $71.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF's competition here
HUT vs GLXY Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GLXY trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -127.13. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GLXY's competition here
HUT vs CIFR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while CIFR trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CIFR's competition here
HUT vs RIOT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while RIOT trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RIOT's competition here
HUT vs SCE-PJ Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
HUT vs HLI Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while HLI trades at $140.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HLI's competition here
HUT vs BGCG Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BGCG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BGCG trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BGCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BGCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BGCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGCG's competition here
HUT vs SNEX Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SNEX trades at $122.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SNEX's competition here
HUT vs BMNR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BMNR trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BMNR's competition here
HUT vs FRHC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while FRHC trades at $142.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 56.58. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FRHC's competition here
HUT vs XP Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while XP trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check XP's competition here
HUT vs GS-PC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GS-PC trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PC's competition here
HUT vs GSIW Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GSIW trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GSIW's competition here
HUT vs PIPR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while PIPR trades at $79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PIPR's competition here
HUT vs RJF-PA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RJF-PA's competition here
HUT vs MARA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MARA trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MARA's competition here
HUT vs BGC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BGC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGC's competition here
HUT vs MC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MC trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MC's competition here
HUT vs FIGR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while FIGR trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FIGR's competition here
HUT vs LAZ Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while LAZ trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LAZ's competition here
HUT vs NAKA Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while NAKA trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check NAKA's competition here
HUT vs MRX Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MRX trades at $59.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MRX's competition here
HUT vs MKTX Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MKTX trades at $116.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MKTX's competition here
HUT vs PJT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while PJT trades at $162.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PJT's competition here
HUT vs MIAX Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MIAX trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MIAX's competition here
HUT vs SF-PB Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SF-PB trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PB's competition here
HUT vs ETOR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while ETOR trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ETOR's competition here
HUT vs SF-PC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SF-PC trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PC's competition here
HUT vs BGCP Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGCP's competition here
HUT vs SF-PD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SF-PD trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PD's competition here
HUT vs CIFRW Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CIFRW's competition here
HUT vs HKIB Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HKIB's competition here
HUT vs PWP Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while PWP trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PWP's competition here
HUT vs BITF Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BITF's competition here
HUT vs PURR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while PURR trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PURR's competition here
HUT vs GOLD Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GOLD trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GOLD's competition here
HUT vs AMRK Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AMRK's competition here
HUT vs COWN Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check COWN's competition here
HUT vs SBET Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SBET trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SBET's competition here
HUT vs OPY Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while OPY trades at $101.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check OPY's competition here
HUT vs ABTC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 996M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while ABTC trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ABTC's competition here
HUT vs DFIN Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 920.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while DFIN trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check DFIN's competition here
HUT vs TIGR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 834.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while TIGR trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TIGR's competition here
HUT vs LCLN Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 743M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while LCLN trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LCLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LCLN's competition here
HUT vs AC Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AC's competition here
HUT vs BTBT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 621.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BTBT trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTBT's competition here
HUT vs GEMI Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 587.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GEMI trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GEMI's competition here
HUT vs RJF-PB Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 424.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while RJF-PB trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RJF-PB's competition here
HUT vs MFH Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MFH's competition here
HUT vs FUFU Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while FUFU trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FUFU's competition here
HUT vs GHL Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GHL's competition here
HUT vs CSHR Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while CSHR trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CSHR's competition here
HUT vs BTGO Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 233.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BTGO trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTGO's competition here
HUT vs DEFT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while DEFT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check DEFT's competition here
HUT vs SWIN Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SWIN's competition here
HUT vs WHG Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while WHG trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check WHG's competition here
HUT vs AXG Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while AXG trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AXG's competition here
HUT vs SUIG Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SUIG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SUIG's competition here
HUT vs SRL Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SRL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SRL's competition here
HUT vs TCJH Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TCJH's competition here
HUT vs SIEB Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SIEB trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SIEB's competition here
HUT vs GRDI Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GRDI's competition here
HUT vs BTCS Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while BTCS trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTCS's competition here
HUT vs DOMH Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while DOMH trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check DOMH's competition here
HUT vs ADEX-WT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
HUT vs PLUT Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while PLUT trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PLUT's competition here
HUT vs HGBL Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while HGBL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HGBL's competition here
HUT vs SDIG Comparison June 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $119.52, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -42.41, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SDIG's competition here