Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT | $91.45 | -11.24% | 10.3B | -50.22 | -$1.83 | N/A |
| MS-PL | $19.33 | +0.05% | 340.3B | 1.55 | $12.47 | +1.86% |
| MS-PO | $16.85 | +0.30% | 339.9B | 1.35 | $12.47 | +1.86% |
| MS | $215.50 | -1.31% | 339.9B | 17.42 | $12.37 | +1.86% |
| MS-PQ | $25.42 | +0.00% | 339.5B | 2.03 | $12.50 | +1.86% |
| MS-PP | $25.10 | +0.20% | 339.2B | 2.01 | $12.47 | +1.86% |
| GS-PC | $19.34 | +0.10% | 332.9B | 0.30 | $65.55 | +1.59% |
| GS | $1,065.22 | -2.76% | 314.4B | 16.45 | $64.79 | +1.59% |
| GS-PD | $19.12 | +0.37% | 202.9B | 0.29 | $65.55 | +1.59% |
| GS-PA | $19.40 | +0.26% | 199.7B | 0.34 | $56.27 | +1.59% |
Stock Comparison
HUT vs MS-PL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 340.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PL trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PL's competition here
HUT vs MS-PO Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PO trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PO's competition here
HUT vs MS Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS trades at $215.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS's competition here
HUT vs MS-PQ Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 339.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PQ trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PQ's competition here
HUT vs MS-PP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 339.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PP trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PP's competition here
HUT vs GS-PC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 332.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS-PC trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PC's competition here
HUT vs GS Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 314.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS trades at $1,065.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS's competition here
HUT vs GS-PD Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 202.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS-PD trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PD's competition here
HUT vs GS-PA Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS-PA trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PA's competition here
HUT vs SCHW-PJ Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 177.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SCHW-PJ trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
HUT vs SCHW-PD Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 177.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
HUT vs SCHW Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 176.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SCHW trades at $101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCHW's competition here
HUT vs HOOD Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while HOOD trades at $99.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 51.22. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HOOD's competition here
HUT vs GS-PJ Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PJ's competition here
HUT vs MS-PA Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PA trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PA's competition here
HUT vs MS-PI Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PI trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PI's competition here
HUT vs MS-PF Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PF's competition here
HUT vs GS-PK Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GS-PK's competition here
HUT vs MS-PE Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PE's competition here
HUT vs MS-PK Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MS-PK trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MS-PK's competition here
HUT vs RJF Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while RJF trades at $168.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RJF's competition here
HUT vs NMR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while NMR trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check NMR's competition here
HUT vs LPLA Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while LPLA trades at $324.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LPLA's competition here
HUT vs TW Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while TW trades at $99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TW's competition here
HUT vs CRCL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while CRCL trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CRCL's competition here
HUT vs FUTU Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while FUTU trades at $95.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FUTU's competition here
HUT vs EVR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while EVR trades at $341.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check EVR's competition here
HUT vs IREN Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while IREN trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -24.19. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check IREN's competition here
HUT vs VIRT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while VIRT trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check VIRT's competition here
HUT vs SF-PB Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SF-PB trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PB's competition here
HUT vs JEF Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while JEF trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check JEF's competition here
HUT vs HLI Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while HLI trades at $140.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HLI's competition here
HUT vs SCE-PJ Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
HUT vs BGCG Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BGCG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BGCG trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BGCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BGCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BGCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGCG's competition here
HUT vs FRHC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while FRHC trades at $152.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FRHC's competition here
HUT vs BMNR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BMNR trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BMNR's competition here
HUT vs BMNP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BMNP trades at $85.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1013.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BMNP's competition here
HUT vs XP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while XP trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check XP's competition here
HUT vs SNEX Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SNEX trades at $102.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SNEX's competition here
HUT vs RIOT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while RIOT trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RIOT's competition here
HUT vs BGC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BGC trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGC's competition here
HUT vs RJF-PA Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check RJF-PA's competition here
HUT vs FIGR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while FIGR trades at $28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 49.95. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FIGR's competition here
HUT vs MC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MC trades at $67.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MC's competition here
HUT vs MRX Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MRX trades at $60.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MRX's competition here
HUT vs LAZ Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while LAZ trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LAZ's competition here
HUT vs MIAX Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MIAX trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MIAX's competition here
HUT vs MARA Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MARA trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MARA's competition here
HUT vs MKTX Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MKTX trades at $113.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MKTX's competition here
HUT vs ETOR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while ETOR trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ETOR's competition here
HUT vs SF-PC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SF-PC trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PC's competition here
HUT vs BGCP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BGCP's competition here
HUT vs SF-PD Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SF-PD trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SF-PD's competition here
HUT vs CIFRW Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CIFRW's competition here
HUT vs HKIB Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HKIB's competition here
HUT vs PWP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while PWP trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PWP's competition here
HUT vs BITF Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BITF's competition here
HUT vs OPY Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while OPY trades at $109.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check OPY's competition here
HUT vs AMRK Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AMRK's competition here
HUT vs SBET Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SBET trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SBET's competition here
HUT vs GOLD Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GOLD trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GOLD's competition here
HUT vs COWN Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check COWN's competition here
HUT vs PURR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 899.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while PURR trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PURR's competition here
HUT vs TIGR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 823.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while TIGR trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TIGR's competition here
HUT vs LCLN Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 766.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while LCLN trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LCLN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check LCLN's competition here
HUT vs AC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AC's competition here
HUT vs BTGO Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 506.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BTGO trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTGO's competition here
HUT vs BTBT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BTBT trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTBT's competition here
HUT vs MFH Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MFH's competition here
HUT vs ABTC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while ABTC trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ABTC's competition here
HUT vs GHL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GHL's competition here
HUT vs CSHR Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while CSHR trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check CSHR's competition here
HUT vs FUFU Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 231.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while FUFU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FUFU's competition here
HUT vs FUFUW Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while FUFUW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check FUFUW's competition here
HUT vs WHG Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while WHG trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check WHG's competition here
HUT vs SWIN Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SWIN's competition here
HUT vs AXG Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while AXG trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -123.28. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AXG's competition here
HUT vs DEFT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while DEFT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check DEFT's competition here
HUT vs TOP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while TOP trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -88.92. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TOP's competition here
HUT vs TCJH Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check TCJH's competition here
HUT vs SUIG Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SUIG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SUIG's competition here
HUT vs SRL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SRL trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -41.41. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SRL's competition here
HUT vs AIFC Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AIFC has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while AIFC trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas AIFC's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AIFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to AIFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check AIFC's competition here
HUT vs SIEB Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SIEB trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SIEB's competition here
HUT vs GRDI Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GRDI's competition here
HUT vs BTCS Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while BTCS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check BTCS's competition here
HUT vs ADEX-WT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
HUT vs PLUT Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while PLUT trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check PLUT's competition here
HUT vs DOMH Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while DOMH trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check DOMH's competition here
HUT vs HGBL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while HGBL trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check HGBL's competition here
HUT vs SDIG Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SDIG's competition here
HUT vs GSIW Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GSIW trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GSIW's competition here
HUT vs MDBH Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MDBH trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MDBH's competition here
HUT vs GREE Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GREE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GREE's competition here
HUT vs COHN Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while COHN trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check COHN's competition here
HUT vs GRYP Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while GRYP trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GRYP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check GRYP's competition here
HUT vs SAI Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check SAI's competition here
HUT vs MEGL Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while MEGL trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check MEGL's competition here
HUT vs ATIF Comparison July 2026
HUT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT is priced at $91.45, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT currently has a P/E ratio of -50.22, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HUT's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.Check ATIF's competition here