Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See SWIN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for SWIN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWIN | $3.28 | +0.00% | 160.9M | -8.04 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| MS | $213.44 | -0.62% | 336.5B | 17.25 | $12.37 | +1.95% |
| MS-PP | $25.14 | +0.62% | 333.8B | 2.02 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PF | $25.29 | +0.08% | 333.2B | 2.03 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PE | $25.46 | +0.12% | 333.2B | 2.04 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PQ | $25.33 | -0.04% | 331.8B | 2.03 | $12.50 | +1.95% |
| MS-PO | $16.42 | -0.06% | 329.2B | 1.32 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| GS-PC | $19.12 | -0.10% | 328.7B | 0.29 | $65.55 | +1.66% |
| MS-PI | $24.43 | -0.45% | 326.4B | 1.96 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
| MS-PK | $22.47 | -0.31% | 323.2B | 1.80 | $12.47 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
SWIN vs MS Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 336.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $213.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
SWIN vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 333.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
SWIN vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
SWIN vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
SWIN vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 331.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
SWIN vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 329.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PO's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
SWIN vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 328.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
SWIN vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
SWIN vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 323.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
SWIN vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 323B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PL's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
SWIN vs GS Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 302.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $1,025.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
SWIN vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
SWIN vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
SWIN vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 191B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $109.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
SWIN vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
SWIN vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
SWIN vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $104.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
SWIN vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
SWIN vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
SWIN vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
SWIN vs NMR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
SWIN vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $370.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
SWIN vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 65.45. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
SWIN vs TW Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check TW's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
SWIN vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $122.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
SWIN vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BMNR's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
SWIN vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check VIRT's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
SWIN vs EVR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $286.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check EVR's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
SWIN vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $98.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1152.71. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BMNP's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
SWIN vs JEF Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check JEF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
SWIN vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
SWIN vs XP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
SWIN vs HUT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $78.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check HUT's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
SWIN vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GLXY's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
SWIN vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SNEX's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
SWIN vs WULF Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while WULF trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check WULF's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
SWIN vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check RIOT's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
SWIN vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check FIGR's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
SWIN vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $162.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MKTX's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
SWIN vs BGC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BGC's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
SWIN vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
SWIN vs MRX Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MRX's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
SWIN vs MC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
SWIN vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
SWIN vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
SWIN vs MARA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
SWIN vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CLSKW's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
SWIN vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CLSK's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
SWIN vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check ETOR's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
SWIN vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BGCP's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
SWIN vs SBET Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SBET's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
SWIN vs PURR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check PURR's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
SWIN vs PWP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while PWP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check PWP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
SWIN vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
SWIN vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check HKIB's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
SWIN vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
SWIN vs OPY Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $118.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check OPY's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
SWIN vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
SWIN vs COWN Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check COWN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
SWIN vs TIGR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while TIGR trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check TIGR's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
SWIN vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 877.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check LCLN's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
SWIN vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 798.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CSHR's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
SWIN vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BTGO's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
SWIN vs AC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check AC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
SWIN vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check ABTC's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
SWIN vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GEMI's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
SWIN vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BTBT's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
SWIN vs MFH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MFH's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
SWIN vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CNCK's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
SWIN vs GHL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GHL's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
SWIN vs CD Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CD's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
SWIN vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check FUFUW's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
SWIN vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 234M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check DEFT's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
SWIN vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check FUFU's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
SWIN vs BRR Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BRR's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
SWIN vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 59.11. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BMHL's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
SWIN vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check NAKA's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
SWIN vs TOP Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -107.64. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check TOP's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
SWIN vs WTF Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check WTF's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
SWIN vs MTC Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MTC's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: AXG)
SWIN vs AXG Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while AXG trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -157.75. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check AXG's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
SWIN vs CANG Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check CANG's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
SWIN vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SIEB's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
SWIN vs SRL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -46.15. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SRL's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
SWIN vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check TCJH's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
SWIN vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GRDI's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
SWIN vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check BTCS's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
SWIN vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
SWIN vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
SWIN vs GREE Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
SWIN vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
SWIN vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check HGBL's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
SWIN vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while PLUT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check PLUT's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
SWIN vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check SDIG's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
SWIN vs COHN Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while COHN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check COHN's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
SWIN vs MATH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MATH trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MATH's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
SWIN vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while GRAN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check GRAN's competition here
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC Class A common (NASDAQ: MDBH)
SWIN vs MDBH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while MDBH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check MDBH's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
SWIN vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWIN stands at 160.9M. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWIN is priced at $3.28 on the NASDAQ, while ATCH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWIN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.04, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SWIN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWIN is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWIN.Check ATCH's competition here