Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MS-PA's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MS-PA and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PA | $18.58 | +0.16% | 65.1B | 1.48 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| GS-PC | $18.71 | -0.21% | 322.9B | 0.27 | $69.55 | +2.03% |
| MS-PL | $17.53 | +0.66% | 293B | 1.40 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| MS-PK | $20.60 | +0.98% | 292.2B | 1.65 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| MS-PP | $22.73 | +0.62% | 291.1B | 1.82 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| MS-PO | $15.29 | +0.86% | 290.7B | 1.21 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| MS | $186.12 | -1.45% | 290.7B | 14.90 | $12.37 | +2.35% |
| MS-PI | $22.17 | +0.18% | 289.3B | 1.78 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
| MS-PQ | $23.42 | +0.34% | 289.2B | 1.87 | $12.50 | +2.35% |
| MS-PE | $24.59 | -0.08% | 288.9B | 1.97 | $12.47 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
MS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 322.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS-PC trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
MS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PL trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
MS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 292.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PK trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
MS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 291.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PP trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
MS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 290.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PO trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
MS-PA vs MS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 290.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS trades at $186.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
MS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 289.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PI trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
MS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 289.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PQ trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
MS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 288.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PE trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
MS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 287.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MS-PF trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PF's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
MS-PA vs GS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 260.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS trades at $906.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
MS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS-PD trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
MS-PA vs GS-PA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 189.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS-PA trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
MS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PD trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
MS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PJ trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
MS-PA vs SCHW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SCHW trades at $89.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
MS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
MS-PA vs HOOD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while HOOD trades at $84.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
MS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
MS-PA vs NMR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while NMR trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NMR's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
MS-PA vs TW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while TW trades at $124.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TW's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
MS-PA vs LPLA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while LPLA trades at $298.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
MS-PA vs CRCL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CRCL trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CRCL's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
MS-PA vs FUTU Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while FUTU trades at $105.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
MS-PA vs BMNP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BMNP trades at $97.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1141.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BMNP's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
MS-PA vs BMNR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BMNR trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BMNR's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
MS-PA vs EVR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while EVR trades at $308.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check EVR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PB)
MS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SF-PB trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PB's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp (NYSE: SF)
MS-PA vs SF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SF trades at $68.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
MS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
MS-PA vs JEF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while JEF trades at $48.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check JEF's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
MS-PA vs XP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while XP trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
MS-PA vs HUT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while HUT trades at $55.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HUT's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
MS-PA vs SNEX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SNEX trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SNEX's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
MS-PA vs GLXY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GLXY trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GLXY's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
MS-PA vs WULF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while WULF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WULF's ROE of -17.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WULF's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
MS-PA vs MKTX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MKTX trades at $165.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MKTX's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
MS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RJF-PA's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
MS-PA vs BGC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BGC trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGC's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
MS-PA vs RIOT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RIOT's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
MS-PA vs VIRT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while VIRT trades at $54.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check VIRT's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
MS-PA vs MRX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MRX trades at $64.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MRX's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
MS-PA vs FIGR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while FIGR trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FIGR's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
MS-PA vs MC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MC trades at $61.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
MS-PA vs LAZ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while LAZ trades at $39.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
MS-PA vs MIAX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MIAX trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MIAX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
MS-PA vs MARA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MARA trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MARA's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
MS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CLSKW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CLSKW's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PC)
MS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SF-PC trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PC's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
MS-PA vs CLSK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CLSK trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CLSK's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
MS-PA vs ETOR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while ETOR trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ETOR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047 (NYSE: SFB)
MS-PA vs SFB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SFB trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SFB's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
MS-PA vs BGCP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGCP's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
MS-PA vs PWP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while PWP trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PWP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
MS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
MS-PA vs HKIB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HKIB's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
MS-PA vs PURR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while PURR trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PURR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PD)
MS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SF-PD trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PD's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
MS-PA vs TOP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while TOP trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -71.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TOP's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
MS-PA vs SBET Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SBET trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SBET's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
MS-PA vs AMRK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AMRK's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
MS-PA vs GOLD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GOLD trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GOLD's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
MS-PA vs COWN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check COWN's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
MS-PA vs OPY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 914.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while OPY trades at $83.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check OPY's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
MS-PA vs LCLN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 871.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while LCLN trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LCLN's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
MS-PA vs CD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 739.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CD trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -168.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CD's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
MS-PA vs TIGR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 696M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while TIGR trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TIGR's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
MS-PA vs AC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AC's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
MS-PA vs BTGO Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 575.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BTGO trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTGO's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
MS-PA vs CSHR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 495.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CSHR trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CSHR's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
MS-PA vs MTC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 488M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MTC trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MTC's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
MS-PA vs ABTC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while ABTC trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ABTC's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
MS-PA vs MFH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MFH's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
MS-PA vs GEMI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 376.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GEMI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GEMI's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
MS-PA vs BRR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BRR trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BRR's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
MS-PA vs BTBT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BTBT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTBT's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
MS-PA vs GHL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GHL's competition here
Silvia, Inc. (NASDAQ: SVIA)
MS-PA vs SVIA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SVIA has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SVIA trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SVIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SVIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SVIA's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
MS-PA vs CNCK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CNCK trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CNCK's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
MS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while FUFUW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFUW's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
MS-PA vs FUFU Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while FUFU trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFU's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
MS-PA vs SWIN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SWIN's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
MS-PA vs DEFT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while DEFT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check DEFT's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
MS-PA vs NAKA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while NAKA trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NAKA's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
MS-PA vs WTF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while WTF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WTF's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
MS-PA vs TCJH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TCJH's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
MS-PA vs BMHL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BMHL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 66.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BMHL's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
MS-PA vs SIEB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SIEB trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -60.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SIEB's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
MS-PA vs GRDI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRDI's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
MS-PA vs SRL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SRL trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SRL's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
MS-PA vs BTCS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while BTCS trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTCS's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
MS-PA vs GREE Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
MS-PA vs ADEX-WT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
MS-PA vs CANG Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while CANG trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CANG's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
MS-PA vs MATH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while MATH trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MATH's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
MS-PA vs NCTY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while NCTY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NCTY's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
MS-PA vs HGBL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while HGBL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HGBL's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
MS-PA vs SDIG Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SDIG's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
MS-PA vs DOMH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 65.1B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.58 on the NYSE, while DOMH trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.48, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check DOMH's competition here