Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL | $29.18 | +3.77% | 40.4B | 12.85 | $2.27 | +1.03% |
| CUK | $27.47 | +0.00% | 36.5B | 12.10 | $2.27 | +0.55% |
| AS | $35.46 | -0.39% | 20.5B | 44.32 | $0.80 | N/A |
| HAS | $83.90 | +0.16% | 11.9B | -52.11 | -$1.61 | +3.35% |
| LTH | $34.31 | -1.61% | 7.6B | 20.06 | $1.71 | N/A |
| GOLF | $98.16 | -1.29% | 5.7B | 34.45 | $2.85 | +1.00% |
| MAT | $14.65 | -0.07% | 4.3B | 9.39 | $1.56 | N/A |
| PLNT | $51.01 | -0.91% | 4.1B | 18.42 | $2.77 | N/A |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| YETI | $50.42 | -0.51% | 3.8B | 25.73 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCL vs CUK Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while CUK trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check CUK's competition here
CCL vs AS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while AS trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 44.32. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check AS's competition here
CCL vs HAS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while HAS trades at $83.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -52.11. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check HAS's competition here
CCL vs LTH Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while LTH trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check LTH's competition here
CCL vs GOLF Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while GOLF trades at $98.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check GOLF's competition here
CCL vs MAT Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while MAT trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check MAT's competition here
CCL vs PLNT Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while PLNT trades at $51.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check PLNT's competition here
CCL vs ELY Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check ELY's competition here
CCL vs YETI Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while YETI trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check YETI's competition here
CCL vs SEAS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check SEAS's competition here
CCL vs CALY Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while CALY trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 66.87. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CALY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check CALY's competition here
CCL vs MODG Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while MODG trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MODG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check MODG's competition here
CCL vs SIX Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check SIX's competition here
CCL vs OSW Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while OSW trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check OSW's competition here
CCL vs VSTO Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check VSTO's competition here
CCL vs FUN Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while FUN trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FUN's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check FUN's competition here
CCL vs PTON Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while PTON trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PTON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check PTON's competition here
CCL vs PRKS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while PRKS trades at $45.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check PRKS's competition here
CCL vs LUCK Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while LUCK trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LUCK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check LUCK's competition here
CCL vs GEAR Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check GEAR's competition here
CCL vs JOUT Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while JOUT trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -30.99. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check JOUT's competition here
CCL vs FNKO Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 300.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while FNKO trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check FNKO's competition here
CCL vs CNXA Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check CNXA's competition here
CCL vs JAKK Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while JAKK trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check JAKK's competition here
CCL vs ESCA Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while ESCA trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check ESCA's competition here
CCL vs XPOF Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while XPOF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check XPOF's competition here
CCL vs HERE Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while HERE trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check HERE's competition here
CCL vs SRM Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check SRM's competition here
CCL vs PLBY Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while PLBY trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PLBY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check PLBY's competition here
CCL vs AOUT Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while AOUT trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check AOUT's competition here
CCL vs CLAR Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while CLAR trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check CLAR's competition here
CCL vs AGH Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while AGH trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check AGH's competition here
CCL vs TRON Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while TRON trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -25.14. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TRON's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check TRON's competition here
CCL vs NOMA Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while NOMA trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check NOMA's competition here
CCL vs ISPO Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while ISPO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check ISPO's competition here
CCL vs BTN Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check BTN's competition here
CCL vs NLS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check NLS's competition here
CCL vs FGH Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check FGH's competition here
CCL vs KMRK Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while KMRK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KMRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check KMRK's competition here
CCL vs DOGZ Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DOGZ trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DOGZ's competition here
CCL vs HWH Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while HWH trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HWH's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check HWH's competition here
CCL vs MMA Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while MMA trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MMA's ROE of -43.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check MMA's competition here
CCL vs NWTG Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while NWTG trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check NWTG's competition here
CCL vs GDHG Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while GDHG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check GDHG's competition here
CCL vs SPGC Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check SPGC's competition here
CCL vs ISPOW Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check ISPOW's competition here
CCL vs BWL-A Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check BWL-A's competition here
CCL vs DVD Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DVD's competition here
CCL vs MYCC Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while MYCC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check MYCC's competition here
CCL vs DS-PC Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DS-PC's competition here
CCL vs DS-PB Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DS-PB's competition here
CCL vs DS-PD Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DS-PD's competition here
CCL vs DS Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check DS's competition here
CCL vs ILG Comparison June 2026
CCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCL stands at 40.4B. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCL is priced at $29.18, while ILG trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.85, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCL is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCL.Check ILG's competition here