Trip.com Group Limited
Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCOM | $52.94 | -2.98% | 34.6B | 14.11 | $3.75 | +0.53% |
| BKNG | $4,034.90 | -1.03% | 124.8B | 25.19 | $153.69 | +0.99% |
| RCL | $317.56 | +0.78% | 82.5B | 19.39 | $15.61 | +1.15% |
| ABNB | $125.26 | -2.06% | 73.7B | 30.51 | $4.03 | N/A |
| VIK | $77.66 | -1.45% | 33.9B | 35.75 | $2.14 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $196.27 | -3.54% | 22.1B | 19.22 | $9.81 | +0.85% |
| NCLH | $24.15 | -0.66% | 10.7B | 16.90 | $1.39 | N/A |
| MMYT | $55.18 | -1.46% | 5.3B | 106.33 | $0.52 | N/A |
| TNL | $74.79 | -1.82% | 4.8B | 12.33 | $6.04 | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
TCOM vs BKNG Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while BKNG trades at $4,034.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check BKNG's competition here
TCOM vs RCL Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while RCL trades at $317.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check RCL's competition here
TCOM vs ABNB Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while ABNB trades at $125.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check ABNB's competition here
TCOM vs VIK Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while VIK trades at $77.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIK's ROE of +6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check VIK's competition here
TCOM vs SABRP Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check SABRP's competition here
TCOM vs EXPE Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while EXPE trades at $196.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check EXPE's competition here
TCOM vs NCLH Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while NCLH trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NCLH's competition here
TCOM vs MMYT Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while MMYT trades at $55.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 106.33. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MMYT's competition here
TCOM vs TNL Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while TNL trades at $74.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check TNL's competition here
TCOM vs DESP Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check DESP's competition here
TCOM vs TRIP Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while TRIP trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check TRIP's competition here
TCOM vs LIND Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while LIND trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -29.88. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check LIND's competition here
TCOM vs NUTR Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NUTR's competition here
TCOM vs SABR Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 355.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while SABR trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check SABR's competition here
TCOM vs AHMA Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while AHMA trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 179.25. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check AHMA's competition here
TCOM vs MRNOW Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while MRNOW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MRNOW's competition here
TCOM vs YTRA Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while YTRA trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check YTRA's competition here
TCOM vs TOUR Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while TOUR trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check TOUR's competition here
TCOM vs NTRP Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while NTRP trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NTRP's competition here
TCOM vs MKGI Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MKGI's competition here
TCOM vs JXG Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 881.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while JXG trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check JXG's competition here
TCOM vs MOND Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MOND's competition here
TCOM vs MONDW Comparison February 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 34.6B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $52.94, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MONDW's competition here