Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See SFT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for SFT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFT | $0.17 | +0.00% | 2.9M | -0.02 | -$9.41 | N/A |
| CVNA | $69.16 | -1.59% | 75.9B | 38.21 | $1.81 | N/A |
| PAG | $215.91 | -0.32% | 14.2B | 16.86 | $12.81 | +2.61% |
| KMX | $61.32 | +1.32% | 8.7B | 21.91 | $2.80 | N/A |
| LAD | $358.02 | -2.22% | 7.9B | 10.66 | $33.61 | +0.66% |
| AN | $203.67 | -1.71% | 6.8B | 10.06 | $20.24 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $49.88 | +1.36% | 5.9B | 16.53 | $3.02 | +1.07% |
| RUSHA | $48.31 | +0.25% | 5.6B | 14.60 | $3.31 | +1.07% |
| VVV | $30.55 | +1.13% | 3.9B | 16.97 | $1.80 | N/A |
| ABG | $208.50 | -0.15% | 3.9B | 7.82 | $26.64 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Carvana Co. (NYSE: CVNA)
SFT vs CVNA Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while CVNA trades at $69.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check CVNA's competition here
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: PAG)
SFT vs PAG Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while PAG trades at $215.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check PAG's competition here
CarMax, Inc. (NYSE: KMX)
SFT vs KMX Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while KMX trades at $61.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check KMX's competition here
Lithia Motors, Inc. (NYSE: LAD)
SFT vs LAD Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while LAD trades at $358.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check LAD's competition here
AutoNation, Inc. (NYSE: AN)
SFT vs AN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while AN trades at $203.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check AN's competition here
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: RUSHB)
SFT vs RUSHB Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while RUSHB trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check RUSHB's competition here
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: RUSHA)
SFT vs RUSHA Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while RUSHA trades at $48.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check RUSHA's competition here
Valvoline Inc. (NYSE: VVV)
SFT vs VVV Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while VVV trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check VVV's competition here
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG)
SFT vs ABG Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while ABG trades at $208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check ABG's competition here
OPENLANE, Inc. (NYSE: OPLN)
SFT vs OPLN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while OPLN trades at $35.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 78.36. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check OPLN's competition here
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (NYSE: GPI)
SFT vs GPI Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while GPI trades at $278.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check GPI's competition here
OPENLANE, Inc. (NYSE: KAR)
SFT vs KAR Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check KAR's competition here
Sonic Automotive, Inc. (NYSE: SAH)
SFT vs SAH Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while SAH trades at $75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check SAH's competition here
Boyd Group Services Inc. (NYSE: BGSI)
SFT vs BGSI Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while BGSI trades at $90.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 43.04. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check BGSI's competition here
Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DRVN)
SFT vs DRVN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while DRVN trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check DRVN's competition here
ACV Auctions Inc. (NYSE: ACVA)
SFT vs ACVA Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while ACVA trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is 94.65. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check ACVA's competition here
NWTN Inc. (NASDAQ: NWTN)
SFT vs NWTN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check NWTN's competition here
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CWH)
SFT vs CWH Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 383.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while CWH trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is 100.67. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check CWH's competition here
RideNow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDNW)
SFT vs RDNW Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while RDNW trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check RDNW's competition here
Kingsway Financial Services Inc. (NYSE: KFS)
SFT vs KFS Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while KFS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check KFS's competition here
Uxin Limited (NASDAQ: UXIN)
SFT vs UXIN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while UXIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check UXIN's competition here
RumbleON, Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBL)
SFT vs RMBL Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check RMBL's competition here
Lazydays Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAZY)
SFT vs LAZY Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check LAZY's competition here
SunCar Technology Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SDA)
SFT vs SDA Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while SDA trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to SDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check SDA's competition here
NextBoat Inc. (AMEX: NXB)
SFT vs NXB Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while NXB trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to NXB's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to NXB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check NXB's competition here
Cazoo Group Ltd (NYSE: CZOO)
SFT vs CZOO Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check CZOO's competition here
America's Car-Mart, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRMT)
SFT vs CRMT Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while CRMT trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check CRMT's competition here
NWTN Inc. (NASDAQ: NWTNW)
SFT vs NWTNW Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check NWTNW's competition here
Autozi Internet Technology (Global) Ltd. (NASDAQ: AZI)
SFT vs AZI Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while AZI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to AZI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to AZI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check AZI's competition here
Jiuzi Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: JZXN)
SFT vs JZXN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while JZXN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check JZXN's competition here
Lazydays Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GORV)
SFT vs GORV Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to GORV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check GORV's competition here
Kaixin Auto Holdings (NASDAQ: KXIN)
SFT vs KXIN Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 29.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while KXIN trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check KXIN's competition here
U Power Limited (NASDAQ: UCAR)
SFT vs UCAR Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while UCAR trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check UCAR's competition here
CarLotz, Inc. (NASDAQ: LOTZW)
SFT vs LOTZW Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check LOTZW's competition here
CarLotz, Inc. (NASDAQ: LOTZ)
SFT vs LOTZ Comparison September 2026
Shift Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17 on the NASDAQ, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.Check LOTZ's competition here