Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GPI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPI | $305.47 | -3.69% | 3.6B | 11.61 | $26.31 | +0.67% |
| CVNA | $63.35 | -4.04% | 68.7B | 36.66 | $1.73 | N/A |
| PAG | $156.46 | -2.06% | 10.3B | 11.31 | $13.83 | +3.39% |
| AN | $178.59 | -1.84% | 6B | 9.68 | $18.45 | N/A |
| LAD | $257.09 | -2.94% | 5.9B | 8.97 | $28.65 | +0.86% |
| RUSHA | $68.60 | -0.19% | 5.3B | 20.73 | $3.31 | +1.11% |
| KMX | $36.27 | -2.11% | 5.1B | 21.61 | $1.68 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $63.72 | -0.87% | 5B | 19.25 | $3.31 | +1.11% |
| OPLN | $34.42 | -1.77% | 3.6B | 76.34 | $0.45 | N/A |
| ABG | $177.50 | +0.69% | 3.3B | 6.28 | $28.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GPI vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CVNA trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CVNA's competition here
GPI vs PAG Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while PAG trades at $156.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check PAG's competition here
GPI vs AN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while AN trades at $178.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check AN's competition here
GPI vs LAD Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while LAD trades at $257.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LAD's competition here
GPI vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while RUSHA trades at $68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RUSHA's competition here
GPI vs KMX Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while KMX trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KMX's competition here
GPI vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while RUSHB trades at $63.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RUSHB's competition here
GPI vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while OPLN trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 76.34. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check OPLN's competition here
GPI vs ABG Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while ABG trades at $177.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check ABG's competition here
GPI vs KAR Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KAR's competition here
GPI vs CARG Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CARG trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CARG's competition here
GPI vs SAH Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while SAH trades at $72.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SAH's competition here
GPI vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while DRVN trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check DRVN's competition here
GPI vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while ACVA trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check ACVA's competition here
GPI vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while UXIN trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check UXIN's competition here
GPI vs CWH Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CWH trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CWH's competition here
GPI vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check NWTN's competition here
GPI vs KFS Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while KFS trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.82. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KFS's competition here
GPI vs CANG Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CANG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CANG's competition here
GPI vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RDNW's competition here
GPI vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RMBL's competition here
GPI vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CRMT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CRMT's competition here
GPI vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LAZY's competition here
GPI vs VRM Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while VRM trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check VRM's competition here
GPI vs OTH Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while OTH trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -31.56. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check OTH's competition here
GPI vs SDA Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while SDA trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SDA's competition here
GPI vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CZOO's competition here
GPI vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check NWTNW's competition here
GPI vs AZI Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while AZI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check AZI's competition here
GPI vs SFT Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SFT's competition here
GPI vs GORV Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check GORV's competition here
GPI vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while JZXN trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check JZXN's competition here
GPI vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LMPX's competition here
GPI vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 159.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while KXIN trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KXIN's competition here
GPI vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 56.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while UCAR trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check UCAR's competition here
GPI vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 25.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while CTNT trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CTNT's competition here
GPI vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LOTZ's competition here
GPI vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $305.47, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.61, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LOTZW's competition here