Lithia Motors, Inc.
Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LAD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | $276.86 | +0.71% | 6.5B | 8.57 | $32.31 | +0.79% |
| CVNA | $406.73 | -0.57% | 88.2B | 48.09 | $8.46 | N/A |
| PAG | $160.14 | -0.17% | 10.5B | 11.33 | $14.13 | +3.31% |
| AN | $204.00 | +0.46% | 7B | 11.97 | $17.04 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $78.46 | +1.44% | 6B | 23.94 | $3.27 | +0.98% |
| RUSHA | $76.20 | +1.71% | 5.9B | 23.30 | $3.27 | +0.98% |
| KMX | $38.17 | -0.26% | 5.4B | 22.72 | $1.68 | N/A |
| GPI | $339.52 | -0.55% | 4B | 13.49 | $25.14 | +0.60% |
| ABG | $200.03 | -1.49% | 3.9B | 7.96 | $25.14 | N/A |
| CARG | $37.73 | +0.29% | 3.7B | 19.26 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LAD vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CVNA trades at $406.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CVNA's competition here
LAD vs PAG Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while PAG trades at $160.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check PAG's competition here
LAD vs AN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while AN trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD and AN have similar daily volatility (2.53).Check AN's competition here
LAD vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while RUSHB trades at $78.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check RUSHB's competition here
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while RUSHA trades at $76.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check RUSHA's competition here
LAD vs KMX Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while KMX trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check KMX's competition here
LAD vs GPI Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while GPI trades at $339.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check GPI's competition here
LAD vs ABG Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while ABG trades at $200.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check ABG's competition here
LAD vs CARG Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CARG trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CARG's competition here
LAD vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while OPLN trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check OPLN's competition here
LAD vs KAR Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check KAR's competition here
LAD vs BGSI Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while BGSI trades at $119.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 145.63. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check BGSI's competition here
LAD vs SAH Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while SAH trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check SAH's competition here
LAD vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while DRVN trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check DRVN's competition here
LAD vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while ACVA trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check ACVA's competition here
LAD vs CARS Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 649.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CARS trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CARS's competition here
LAD vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 614M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while UXIN trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check UXIN's competition here
LAD vs CWH Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CWH trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CWH's competition here
LAD vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check NWTN's competition here
LAD vs KFS Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 336.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while KFS trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check KFS's competition here
LAD vs SDA Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while SDA trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -12.91. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check SDA's competition here
LAD vs CANG Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CANG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CANG's competition here
LAD vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check RDNW's competition here
LAD vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check RMBL's competition here
LAD vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CRMT trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CRMT's competition here
LAD vs VRM Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while VRM trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check VRM's competition here
LAD vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check LAZY's competition here
LAD vs OTH Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while OTH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -36.37. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check OTH's competition here
LAD vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CZOO's competition here
LAD vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check NWTNW's competition here
LAD vs AZI Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while AZI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check AZI's competition here
LAD vs SFT Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check SFT's competition here
LAD vs GORV Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check GORV's competition here
LAD vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while JZXN trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check JZXN's competition here
LAD vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 763.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check LMPX's competition here
LAD vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 166.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while KXIN trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check KXIN's competition here
LAD vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 91.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while CTNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check CTNT's competition here
LAD vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 80K. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while UCAR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check UCAR's competition here
LAD vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check LOTZ's competition here
LAD vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $276.86, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.Check LOTZW's competition here