Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $74.03 | +2.85% | 5.7B | 22.37 | $3.31 | +1.01% |
| CVNA | $395.80 | -0.20% | 85.8B | 46.84 | $8.45 | N/A |
| PAG | $171.52 | -0.08% | 11.3B | 12.24 | $14.02 | +3.09% |
| AN | $212.38 | +3.25% | 7.3B | 12.54 | $17.03 | N/A |
| LAD | $290.12 | -0.30% | 6.8B | 10.13 | $28.66 | +0.75% |
| RUSHB | $72.86 | +2.36% | 5.6B | 21.96 | $3.31 | +1.01% |
| KMX | $39.31 | +2.50% | 5.6B | 23.39 | $1.68 | N/A |
| GPI | $356.87 | +2.19% | 4.2B | 14.19 | $25.14 | +0.57% |
| ABG | $203.69 | +1.14% | 3.9B | 7.20 | $28.30 | N/A |
| CARG | $36.46 | -0.57% | 3.6B | 18.60 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CVNA trades at $395.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CVNA's competition here
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while PAG trades at $171.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHA vs AN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while AN trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AN's competition here
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while LAD trades at $290.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while RUSHB trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RUSHB's competition here
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while KMX trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while GPI trades at $356.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while ABG trades at $203.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHA vs CARG Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CARG trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARG's competition here
RUSHA vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while OPLN trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OPLN's competition here
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHA vs BGSI Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while BGSI trades at $123.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 150.85. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check BGSI's competition here
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while SAH trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while DRVN trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 902M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while ACVA trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CARS trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while UXIN trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 520.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CWH trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while KFS trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.14. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CANG trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHA vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RDNW's competition here
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while SDA trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CRMT trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while VRM trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHA vs OTH Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while OTH trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OTH's competition here
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while AZI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while JZXN trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 154.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while KXIN trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 72.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while UCAR trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 52.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while CTNT trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZ's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $74.03, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.37, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZW's competition here