Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAH | $84.67 | +0.19% | 2.9B | 12.57 | $6.74 | +1.84% |
| CVNA | $63.72 | +2.20% | 69.9B | 38.62 | $1.65 | N/A |
| PAG | $180.06 | -1.18% | 11.8B | 13.88 | $12.97 | +3.06% |
| KMX | $53.15 | +0.74% | 7.5B | 18.98 | $2.80 | N/A |
| LAD | $291.36 | -0.25% | 6.7B | 8.62 | $33.82 | +0.76% |
| AN | $188.89 | -1.43% | 6.3B | 9.34 | $20.24 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $75.56 | -0.46% | 5.6B | 22.83 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| RUSHA | $72.37 | -0.56% | 5.6B | 21.86 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| OPLN | $41.54 | -3.17% | 4.4B | 92.15 | $0.45 | N/A |
| GPI | $297.85 | -1.29% | 3.5B | 7.61 | $39.12 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
SAH vs CVNA Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CVNA trades at $63.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CVNA's competition here
SAH vs PAG Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while PAG trades at $180.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check PAG's competition here
SAH vs KMX Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while KMX trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check KMX's competition here
SAH vs LAD Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while LAD trades at $291.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check LAD's competition here
SAH vs AN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while AN trades at $188.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check AN's competition here
SAH vs RUSHB Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while RUSHB trades at $75.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check RUSHB's competition here
SAH vs RUSHA Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while RUSHA trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check RUSHA's competition here
SAH vs OPLN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while OPLN trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 92.15. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check OPLN's competition here
SAH vs GPI Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while GPI trades at $297.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check GPI's competition here
SAH vs CARG Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CARG trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CARG's competition here
SAH vs KAR Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check KAR's competition here
SAH vs DRVN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while DRVN trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check DRVN's competition here
SAH vs ACVA Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while ACVA trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is 65.41. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check ACVA's competition here
SAH vs CWH Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 508.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CWH trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CWH's competition here
SAH vs NWTN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check NWTN's competition here
SAH vs UXIN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 329.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while UXIN trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check UXIN's competition here
SAH vs RDNW Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while RDNW trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check RDNW's competition here
SAH vs KFS Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while KFS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check KFS's competition here
SAH vs RMBL Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check RMBL's competition here
SAH vs SDA Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while SDA trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -25.74. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check SDA's competition here
SAH vs LAZY Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check LAZY's competition here
SAH vs VRM Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while VRM trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check VRM's competition here
SAH vs CZOO Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CZOO's competition here
SAH vs CRMT Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CRMT trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CRMT's competition here
SAH vs AZI Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while AZI trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check AZI's competition here
SAH vs NWTNW Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check NWTNW's competition here
SAH vs SFT Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check SFT's competition here
SAH vs GORV Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check GORV's competition here
SAH vs JZXN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while JZXN trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check JZXN's competition here
SAH vs KXIN Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 119.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while KXIN trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check KXIN's competition here
SAH vs UCAR Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 53.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while UCAR trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check UCAR's competition here
SAH vs CTNT Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while CTNT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check CTNT's competition here
SAH vs LOTZ Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check LOTZ's competition here
SAH vs LOTZW Comparison July 2026
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $84.67, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.57, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.Check LOTZW's competition here