CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CARG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARG | $33.03 | +6.45% | 3.2B | 14.06 | $2.35 | N/A |
| CVNA | $62.35 | -5.82% | 68.4B | 37.80 | $1.65 | N/A |
| PAG | $182.21 | -0.89% | 12B | 14.05 | $12.97 | +3.06% |
| KMX | $52.76 | -0.26% | 7.5B | 18.82 | $2.80 | N/A |
| LAD | $292.10 | -1.56% | 6.7B | 8.64 | $33.82 | +0.77% |
| AN | $191.64 | -0.21% | 6.4B | 9.47 | $20.24 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $75.91 | -0.13% | 5.9B | 22.93 | $3.31 | +1.06% |
| RUSHA | $72.78 | -0.64% | 5.7B | 21.99 | $3.31 | +1.06% |
| OPLN | $42.90 | +8.22% | 4.5B | 93.43 | $0.45 | N/A |
| GPI | $301.74 | +0.31% | 3.6B | 7.71 | $39.12 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
CARG vs CVNA Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while CVNA trades at $62.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check CVNA's competition here
CARG vs PAG Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while PAG trades at $182.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check PAG's competition here
CARG vs KMX Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while KMX trades at $52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check KMX's competition here
CARG vs LAD Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while LAD trades at $292.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check LAD's competition here
CARG vs AN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while AN trades at $191.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check AN's competition here
CARG vs RUSHB Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while RUSHB trades at $75.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check RUSHB's competition here
CARG vs RUSHA Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while RUSHA trades at $72.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check RUSHA's competition here
CARG vs OPLN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while OPLN trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 93.43. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check OPLN's competition here
CARG vs GPI Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while GPI trades at $301.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check GPI's competition here
CARG vs KAR Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check KAR's competition here
CARG vs SAH Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while SAH trades at $84.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check SAH's competition here
CARG vs DRVN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while DRVN trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check DRVN's competition here
CARG vs ACVA Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while ACVA trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check ACVA's competition here
CARG vs CWH Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while CWH trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is 126.17. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check CWH's competition here
CARG vs NWTN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check NWTN's competition here
CARG vs UXIN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while UXIN trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check UXIN's competition here
CARG vs RDNW Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while RDNW trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check RDNW's competition here
CARG vs KFS Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while KFS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check KFS's competition here
CARG vs RMBL Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check RMBL's competition here
CARG vs SDA Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while SDA trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -25.43. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check SDA's competition here
CARG vs LAZY Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check LAZY's competition here
CARG vs VRM Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while VRM trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check VRM's competition here
CARG vs CZOO Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check CZOO's competition here
CARG vs CRMT Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while CRMT trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check CRMT's competition here
CARG vs NWTNW Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check NWTNW's competition here
CARG vs AZI Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while AZI trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AZI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check AZI's competition here
CARG vs SFT Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check SFT's competition here
CARG vs GORV Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check GORV's competition here
CARG vs JZXN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while JZXN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check JZXN's competition here
CARG vs KXIN Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 119.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while KXIN trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check KXIN's competition here
CARG vs UCAR Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 52.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while UCAR trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check UCAR's competition here
CARG vs CTNT Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 25.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while CTNT trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is more volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check CTNT's competition here
CARG vs LOTZ Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check LOTZ's competition here
CARG vs LOTZW Comparison July 2026
CARG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARG is priced at $33.03, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.06, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARG's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARG is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARG.Check LOTZW's competition here