Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | $71.18 | -7.14% | 5.5B | 21.77 | $3.27 | +1.00% |
| CVNA | $396.59 | -2.42% | 86B | 46.96 | $8.45 | N/A |
| PAG | $171.66 | +6.26% | 11.3B | 12.14 | $14.14 | +3.33% |
| AN | $205.69 | +2.35% | 7.1B | 12.07 | $17.04 | N/A |
| LAD | $291.00 | +4.96% | 6.8B | 8.99 | $32.33 | +0.79% |
| RUSHA | $71.98 | -4.42% | 5.5B | 22.01 | $3.27 | +1.00% |
| KMX | $38.35 | -0.75% | 5.4B | 22.81 | $1.68 | N/A |
| GPI | $349.21 | +1.31% | 4.1B | 13.90 | $25.13 | +0.60% |
| ABG | $201.39 | +0.41% | 3.9B | 7.11 | $28.30 | N/A |
| CARG | $36.67 | -0.76% | 3.6B | 18.71 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHB vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CVNA trades at $396.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 46.96. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CVNA's competition here
RUSHB vs PAG Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while PAG trades at $171.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHB vs AN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while AN trades at $205.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AN's competition here
RUSHB vs LAD Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while LAD trades at $291.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHB vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while RUSHA trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RUSHA's competition here
RUSHB vs KMX Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while KMX trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHB vs GPI Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while GPI trades at $349.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHB vs ABG Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while ABG trades at $201.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHB vs CARG Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CARG trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CARG's competition here
RUSHB vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while OPLN trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check OPLN's competition here
RUSHB vs KAR Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHB vs BGSI Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while BGSI trades at $117.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 143.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check BGSI's competition here
RUSHB vs SAH Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while SAH trades at $73.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHB vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while DRVN trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHB vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 909M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while ACVA trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHB vs CARS Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CARS trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHB vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 599.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while UXIN trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs CWH Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 438.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CWH trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHB vs KFS Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 317.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while KFS trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHB vs CANG Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CANG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHB vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RDNW's competition here
RUSHB vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHB vs SDA Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while SDA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHB vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CRMT trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHB vs VRM Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while VRM trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHB vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHB vs OTH Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while OTH trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -35.37. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check OTH's competition here
RUSHB vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHB vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while CTNT trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHB vs AZI Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while AZI trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHB vs SFT Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHB vs GORV Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHB vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while JZXN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHB vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHB vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 150.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while KXIN trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 84.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while UCAR trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZ's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $71.18, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.77, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZW's competition here