Kingsway Financial Services Inc.
Kingsway Financial Services Inc. (KFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KFS | $11.50 | -1.79% | 332.9M | -27.05 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| CVNA | $401.85 | -1.20% | 88.1B | 48.04 | $8.46 | N/A |
| PAG | $179.84 | +12.30% | 10.6B | 11.45 | $14.12 | +3.33% |
| AN | $207.50 | +1.72% | 6.9B | 11.79 | $17.04 | N/A |
| LAD | $296.66 | +7.15% | 6.5B | 8.58 | $32.31 | +0.79% |
| RUSHB | $76.27 | -2.79% | 5.9B | 23.44 | $3.27 | +1.00% |
| RUSHA | $75.56 | -0.84% | 5.8B | 23.03 | $3.27 | +1.00% |
| KMX | $38.89 | +1.89% | 5.5B | 22.99 | $1.68 | N/A |
| GPI | $359.56 | +5.90% | 4.1B | 13.73 | $25.14 | +0.60% |
| ABG | $201.60 | +0.78% | 3.9B | 7.99 | $25.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KFS vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CVNA trades at $401.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CVNA's competition here
KFS vs PAG Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while PAG trades at $179.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check PAG's competition here
KFS vs AN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while AN trades at $207.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check AN's competition here
KFS vs LAD Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while LAD trades at $296.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check LAD's competition here
KFS vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while RUSHB trades at $76.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check RUSHB's competition here
KFS vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while RUSHA trades at $75.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check RUSHA's competition here
KFS vs KMX Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while KMX trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check KMX's competition here
KFS vs GPI Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while GPI trades at $359.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check GPI's competition here
KFS vs ABG Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while ABG trades at $201.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check ABG's competition here
KFS vs CARG Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CARG trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CARG's competition here
KFS vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while OPLN trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 70.26. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check OPLN's competition here
KFS vs KAR Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check KAR's competition here
KFS vs BGSI Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while BGSI trades at $122.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 150.91. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check BGSI's competition here
KFS vs SAH Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while SAH trades at $75.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check SAH's competition here
KFS vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while DRVN trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check DRVN's competition here
KFS vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 871.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while ACVA trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check ACVA's competition here
KFS vs CARS Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 654.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CARS trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CARS's competition here
KFS vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while UXIN trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check UXIN's competition here
KFS vs CWH Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 431.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CWH trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CWH's competition here
KFS vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check NWTN's competition here
KFS vs CANG Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CANG trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CANG's competition here
KFS vs SDA Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while SDA trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check SDA's competition here
KFS vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check RDNW's competition here
KFS vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check RMBL's competition here
KFS vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CRMT trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CRMT's competition here
KFS vs VRM Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while VRM trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check VRM's competition here
KFS vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check LAZY's competition here
KFS vs OTH Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while OTH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -36.81. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check OTH's competition here
KFS vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CZOO's competition here
KFS vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check NWTNW's competition here
KFS vs AZI Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while AZI trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check AZI's competition here
KFS vs SFT Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check SFT's competition here
KFS vs GORV Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check GORV's competition here
KFS vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while JZXN trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check JZXN's competition here
KFS vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 763.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check LMPX's competition here
KFS vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 160.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while KXIN trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check KXIN's competition here
KFS vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 81.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while UCAR trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check UCAR's competition here
KFS vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 76.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while CTNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check CTNT's competition here
KFS vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check LOTZW's competition here
KFS vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
KFS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KFS stands at 332.9M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KFS is priced at $11.50, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KFS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.05, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KFS's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KFS is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KFS.Check LOTZ's competition here