America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRMT | $2.82 | +9.96% | 23.2M | 9.30 | $0.30 | N/A |
| CVNA | $68.96 | +8.22% | 72.1B | 39.82 | $1.65 | N/A |
| PAG | $176.55 | -1.95% | 11.8B | 13.80 | $12.97 | +3.08% |
| KMX | $52.33 | -1.54% | 7.5B | 18.89 | $2.80 | N/A |
| LAD | $289.41 | -0.67% | 6.6B | 8.59 | $33.82 | +0.77% |
| AN | $184.50 | -2.32% | 6.2B | 9.18 | $20.24 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $75.11 | -0.60% | 5.7B | 23.11 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| RUSHA | $72.13 | -0.33% | 5.7B | 22.05 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| OPLN | $40.31 | -2.96% | 4.4B | 91.50 | $0.45 | N/A |
| GPI | $285.77 | -4.06% | 3.5B | 7.46 | $39.12 | +0.72% |
Stock Comparison
CRMT vs CVNA Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while CVNA trades at $68.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check CVNA's competition here
CRMT vs PAG Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while PAG trades at $176.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check PAG's competition here
CRMT vs KMX Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while KMX trades at $52.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check KMX's competition here
CRMT vs LAD Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while LAD trades at $289.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check LAD's competition here
CRMT vs AN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while AN trades at $184.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check AN's competition here
CRMT vs RUSHB Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while RUSHB trades at $75.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check RUSHB's competition here
CRMT vs RUSHA Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while RUSHA trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check RUSHA's competition here
CRMT vs OPLN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while OPLN trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check OPLN's competition here
CRMT vs GPI Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while GPI trades at $285.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check GPI's competition here
CRMT vs CARG Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while CARG trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check CARG's competition here
CRMT vs KAR Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check KAR's competition here
CRMT vs SAH Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while SAH trades at $82.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check SAH's competition here
CRMT vs DRVN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while DRVN trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check DRVN's competition here
CRMT vs ACVA Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while ACVA trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check ACVA's competition here
CRMT vs CWH Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while CWH trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is 127.33. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check CWH's competition here
CRMT vs NWTN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check NWTN's competition here
CRMT vs UXIN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while UXIN trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check UXIN's competition here
CRMT vs RDNW Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while RDNW trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check RDNW's competition here
CRMT vs KFS Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while KFS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check KFS's competition here
CRMT vs RMBL Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check RMBL's competition here
CRMT vs SDA Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while SDA trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -25.46. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check SDA's competition here
CRMT vs LAZY Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check LAZY's competition here
CRMT vs VRM Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while VRM trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check VRM's competition here
CRMT vs CZOO Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check CZOO's competition here
CRMT vs NWTNW Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check NWTNW's competition here
CRMT vs AZI Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while AZI trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check AZI's competition here
CRMT vs SFT Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check SFT's competition here
CRMT vs GORV Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check GORV's competition here
CRMT vs JZXN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while JZXN trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check JZXN's competition here
CRMT vs KXIN Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 111.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while KXIN trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check KXIN's competition here
CRMT vs UCAR Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 53.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while UCAR trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is more volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check UCAR's competition here
CRMT vs CTNT Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while CTNT trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check CTNT's competition here
CRMT vs LOTZ Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check LOTZ's competition here
CRMT vs LOTZW Comparison July 2026
CRMT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMT stands at 23.2M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMT is priced at $2.82, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMT's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMT is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMT.Check LOTZW's competition here