OPENLANE, Inc.
OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAR | $27.44 | +0.40% | 2.9B | 31.54 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CVNA | $67.17 | -3.39% | 72.8B | 38.84 | $1.73 | N/A |
| PAG | $162.18 | -4.07% | 10.7B | 11.73 | $13.83 | +3.26% |
| AN | $184.15 | -4.41% | 6.2B | 9.99 | $18.44 | N/A |
| LAD | $261.92 | -4.67% | 6B | 9.22 | $28.44 | +0.84% |
| RUSHA | $68.72 | -2.64% | 5.3B | 20.76 | $3.31 | +1.10% |
| KMX | $36.93 | -3.05% | 5.2B | 22.01 | $1.68 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $63.98 | -1.92% | 5B | 19.33 | $3.31 | +1.10% |
| GPI | $313.62 | -6.19% | 3.7B | 11.92 | $26.32 | +0.64% |
| OPLN | $34.90 | -2.32% | 3.7B | 77.45 | $0.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KAR vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CVNA trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CVNA's competition here
KAR vs PAG Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while PAG trades at $162.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check PAG's competition here
KAR vs AN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while AN trades at $184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check AN's competition here
KAR vs LAD Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LAD trades at $261.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LAD's competition here
KAR vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RUSHA trades at $68.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RUSHA's competition here
KAR vs KMX Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KMX trades at $36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KMX's competition here
KAR vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RUSHB trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RUSHB's competition here
KAR vs GPI Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while GPI trades at $313.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check GPI's competition here
KAR vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while OPLN trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 77.45. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check OPLN's competition here
KAR vs ABG Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while ABG trades at $179.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check ABG's competition here
KAR vs CARG Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CARG trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CARG's competition here
KAR vs SAH Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SAH trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SAH's competition here
KAR vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while DRVN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check DRVN's competition here
KAR vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while ACVA trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check ACVA's competition here
KAR vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while UXIN trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check UXIN's competition here
KAR vs CWH Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CWH trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CWH's competition here
KAR vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check NWTN's competition here
KAR vs KFS Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KFS trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.95. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KFS's competition here
KAR vs CANG Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CANG trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CANG's competition here
KAR vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RDNW's competition here
KAR vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RMBL's competition here
KAR vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CRMT trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CRMT's competition here
KAR vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LAZY's competition here
KAR vs SDA Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SDA trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SDA's competition here
KAR vs OTH Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while OTH trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -32.37. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check OTH's competition here
KAR vs VRM Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while VRM trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check VRM's competition here
KAR vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CZOO's competition here
KAR vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check NWTNW's competition here
KAR vs AZI Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while AZI trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check AZI's competition here
KAR vs SFT Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SFT's competition here
KAR vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while JZXN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check JZXN's competition here
KAR vs GORV Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check GORV's competition here
KAR vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LMPX's competition here
KAR vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 156.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KXIN trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KXIN's competition here
KAR vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 60.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while UCAR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check UCAR's competition here
KAR vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 29.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CTNT trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CTNT's competition here
KAR vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LOTZ's competition here
KAR vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LOTZW's competition here