Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAG | $176.81 | -1.20% | 11.6B | 13.66 | $12.97 | +3.08% |
| CVNA | $68.34 | +3.83% | 74.4B | 41.13 | $1.65 | N/A |
| KMX | $52.01 | -1.66% | 7.4B | 18.50 | $2.80 | N/A |
| LAD | $289.44 | -0.36% | 6.6B | 8.58 | $33.82 | +0.77% |
| AN | $183.91 | -1.01% | 6.2B | 9.11 | $20.24 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $75.28 | -1.59% | 5.6B | 22.72 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| RUSHA | $72.08 | -1.24% | 5.6B | 21.74 | $3.31 | +1.05% |
| OPLN | $40.29 | -2.30% | 4.3B | 89.26 | $0.45 | N/A |
| GPI | $286.60 | -1.57% | 3.4B | 7.32 | $39.12 | +0.72% |
| CARG | $35.23 | +3.36% | 3.4B | 14.95 | $2.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAG vs CVNA Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CVNA trades at $68.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CVNA's competition here
PAG vs KMX Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while KMX trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KMX's competition here
PAG vs LAD Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while LAD trades at $289.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LAD's competition here
PAG vs AN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while AN trades at $183.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check AN's competition here
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while RUSHB trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RUSHB's competition here
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while RUSHA trades at $72.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RUSHA's competition here
PAG vs OPLN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while OPLN trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 89.26. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check OPLN's competition here
PAG vs GPI Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while GPI trades at $286.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check GPI's competition here
PAG vs CARG Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CARG trades at $35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CARG's competition here
PAG vs KAR Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KAR's competition here
PAG vs SAH Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while SAH trades at $82.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SAH's competition here
PAG vs DRVN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while DRVN trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRVN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check DRVN's competition here
PAG vs ACVA Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while ACVA trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check ACVA's competition here
PAG vs CWH Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CWH trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is 125.33. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CWH's competition here
PAG vs UXIN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 426.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while UXIN trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check UXIN's competition here
PAG vs NWTN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check NWTN's competition here
PAG vs RDNW Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while RDNW trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RDNW's competition here
PAG vs KFS Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while KFS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KFS's competition here
PAG vs RMBL Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RMBL's competition here
PAG vs SDA Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while SDA trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -26.79. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SDA's competition here
PAG vs LAZY Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LAZY's competition here
PAG vs VRM Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while VRM trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check VRM's competition here
PAG vs CZOO Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CZOO's competition here
PAG vs CRMT Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CRMT trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CRMT's competition here
PAG vs NWTNW Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check NWTNW's competition here
PAG vs AZI Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while AZI trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check AZI's competition here
PAG vs SFT Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SFT's competition here
PAG vs GORV Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check GORV's competition here
PAG vs JZXN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while JZXN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check JZXN's competition here
PAG vs KXIN Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 112.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while KXIN trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KXIN's competition here
PAG vs UCAR Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 52.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while UCAR trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check UCAR's competition here
PAG vs CTNT Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while CTNT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CTNT's competition here
PAG vs LOTZ Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LOTZ's competition here
PAG vs LOTZW Comparison July 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $176.81, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.66, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LOTZW's competition here