Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAG | $159.75 | -1.50% | 10.5B | 11.55 | $13.83 | +3.34% |
| CVNA | $66.02 | -1.71% | 71.6B | 38.17 | $1.73 | N/A |
| AN | $181.94 | -1.20% | 6.1B | 9.88 | $18.43 | N/A |
| LAD | $264.89 | +1.13% | 6B | 9.25 | $28.65 | +0.83% |
| RUSHA | $68.73 | +0.01% | 5.3B | 20.76 | $3.31 | +1.10% |
| KMX | $37.05 | +0.32% | 5.3B | 22.06 | $1.68 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $64.28 | +0.47% | 5B | 19.42 | $3.31 | +1.10% |
| GPI | $317.18 | +1.14% | 3.8B | 12.07 | $26.31 | +0.65% |
| OPLN | $35.04 | +0.40% | 3.7B | 77.76 | $0.45 | N/A |
| ABG | $176.28 | -1.61% | 3.3B | 6.23 | $28.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAG vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CVNA trades at $66.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CVNA's competition here
PAG vs AN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while AN trades at $181.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check AN's competition here
PAG vs LAD Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while LAD trades at $264.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LAD's competition here
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while RUSHA trades at $68.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RUSHA's competition here
PAG vs KMX Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while KMX trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KMX's competition here
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while RUSHB trades at $64.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RUSHB's competition here
PAG vs GPI Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while GPI trades at $317.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check GPI's competition here
PAG vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while OPLN trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 77.76. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check OPLN's competition here
PAG vs ABG Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while ABG trades at $176.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check ABG's competition here
PAG vs KAR Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KAR's competition here
PAG vs CARG Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CARG trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CARG's competition here
PAG vs SAH Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while SAH trades at $74.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SAH's competition here
PAG vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while DRVN trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check DRVN's competition here
PAG vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while ACVA trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -16.71. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check ACVA's competition here
PAG vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 523.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while UXIN trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check UXIN's competition here
PAG vs CWH Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CWH trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CWH's competition here
PAG vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check NWTN's competition here
PAG vs KFS Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while KFS trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KFS's competition here
PAG vs CANG Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CANG trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CANG's competition here
PAG vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RDNW's competition here
PAG vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check RMBL's competition here
PAG vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CRMT trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CRMT's competition here
PAG vs LAZY Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LAZY's competition here
PAG vs SDA Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while SDA trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SDA's competition here
PAG vs VRM Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while VRM trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check VRM's competition here
PAG vs OTH Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while OTH trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check OTH's competition here
PAG vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CZOO's competition here
PAG vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check NWTNW's competition here
PAG vs AZI Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while AZI trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check AZI's competition here
PAG vs SFT Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check SFT's competition here
PAG vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while JZXN trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check JZXN's competition here
PAG vs GORV Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check GORV's competition here
PAG vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LMPX's competition here
PAG vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while KXIN trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check KXIN's competition here
PAG vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while UCAR trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check UCAR's competition here
PAG vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 28.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while CTNT trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check CTNT's competition here
PAG vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LOTZW's competition here
PAG vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $159.75, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.55, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.Check LOTZ's competition here