Lazydays Holdings, Inc.
Lazydays Holdings, Inc. (LAZY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LAZY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAZY | $5.34 | +0.00% | 77.1M | -9.89 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| CVNA | $64.85 | +2.37% | 70.4B | 37.77 | $1.72 | N/A |
| PAG | $161.66 | +3.32% | 10.5B | 11.49 | $13.83 | +3.39% |
| LAD | $275.26 | +7.07% | 6.2B | 9.46 | $28.67 | +0.82% |
| AN | $187.99 | +5.26% | 6.2B | 10.01 | $18.45 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $69.77 | +1.71% | 5.4B | 21.13 | $3.31 | +1.08% |
| KMX | $38.74 | +6.81% | 5.3B | 22.24 | $1.68 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $65.78 | +3.23% | 5.1B | 19.80 | $3.31 | +1.08% |
| GPI | $322.70 | +5.64% | 3.8B | 11.98 | $26.31 | +0.65% |
| OPLN | $34.75 | +0.96% | 3.7B | 78.30 | $0.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LAZY vs CVNA Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CVNA trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CVNA's competition here
LAZY vs PAG Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while PAG trades at $161.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check PAG's competition here
LAZY vs LAD Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while LAD trades at $275.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check LAD's competition here
LAZY vs AN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while AN trades at $187.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check AN's competition here
LAZY vs RUSHA Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while RUSHA trades at $69.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check RUSHA's competition here
LAZY vs KMX Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while KMX trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check KMX's competition here
LAZY vs RUSHB Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while RUSHB trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check RUSHB's competition here
LAZY vs GPI Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while GPI trades at $322.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check GPI's competition here
LAZY vs OPLN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while OPLN trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 78.30. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check OPLN's competition here
LAZY vs ABG Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while ABG trades at $185.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check ABG's competition here
LAZY vs KAR Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check KAR's competition here
LAZY vs CARG Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CARG trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CARG's competition here
LAZY vs SAH Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while SAH trades at $76.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check SAH's competition here
LAZY vs DRVN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while DRVN trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check DRVN's competition here
LAZY vs ACVA Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while ACVA trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check ACVA's competition here
LAZY vs UXIN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 514.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while UXIN trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check UXIN's competition here
LAZY vs CWH Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CWH trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CWH's competition here
LAZY vs NWTN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check NWTN's competition here
LAZY vs KFS Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while KFS trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check KFS's competition here
LAZY vs CANG Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 198.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CANG trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CANG's competition here
LAZY vs RDNW Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check RDNW's competition here
LAZY vs RMBL Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check RMBL's competition here
LAZY vs CRMT Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CRMT trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CRMT's competition here
LAZY vs VRM Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while VRM trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check VRM's competition here
LAZY vs OTH Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while OTH trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check OTH's competition here
LAZY vs SDA Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while SDA trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check SDA's competition here
LAZY vs CZOO Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CZOO's competition here
LAZY vs NWTNW Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check NWTNW's competition here
LAZY vs AZI Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while AZI trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check AZI's competition here
LAZY vs SFT Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check SFT's competition here
LAZY vs GORV Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check GORV's competition here
LAZY vs JZXN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while JZXN trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check JZXN's competition here
LAZY vs LMPX Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check LMPX's competition here
LAZY vs KXIN Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 166.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while KXIN trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check KXIN's competition here
LAZY vs UCAR Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while UCAR trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check UCAR's competition here
LAZY vs CTNT Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while CTNT trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check CTNT's competition here
LAZY vs LOTZW Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check LOTZW's competition here
LAZY vs LOTZ Comparison May 2026
LAZY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAZY stands at 77.1M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAZY is priced at $5.34, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAZY currently has a P/E ratio of -9.89, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LAZY's ROE is -4.64%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAZY is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAZY.Check LOTZ's competition here