Shift Technologies, Inc.
Shift Technologies, Inc. SFT Peers
See (SFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFT | $0.17 | N/A | 2.9M | -0.02 | -$9.41 | N/A |
| CPRT | $52.05 | -1.46% | 50.3B | 35.17 | $1.48 | N/A |
| PAG | $163.12 | -0.65% | 10.8B | 11.50 | $14.19 | +2.91% |
| KMX | $62.93 | -0.05% | 9.6B | 19.60 | $3.21 | N/A |
| LAD | $313.95 | -0.61% | 8.2B | 9.90 | $31.71 | +0.68% |
| AN | $182.95 | -1.35% | 6.9B | 10.84 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $427.38 | -1.53% | 5.5B | 12.00 | $35.61 | +0.45% |
| ABG | $228.60 | -0.48% | 4.5B | 10.89 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $48.94 | -2.28% | 3.9B | 13.71 | $3.57 | +1.47% |
| RUSHB | $51.80 | -2.74% | 3.8B | 14.51 | $3.57 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
SFT vs CPRT Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CPRT trades at $52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs PAG Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while PAG trades at $163.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs KMX Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while KMX trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs LAD Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while LAD trades at $313.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs AN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while AN trades at $182.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs GPI Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while GPI trades at $427.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs ABG Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while ABG trades at $228.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs RUSHA Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while RUSHA trades at $48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs RUSHB Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while RUSHB trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs ACVA Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while ACVA trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs DRVN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while DRVN trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs KAR Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while KAR trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs SAH Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while SAH trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CWH Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CWH trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -34.43. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs NWTN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 657.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while NWTN trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CARS Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 643M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CARS trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CANG Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 505.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CANG trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -162.33. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CRMT Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CRMT trades at $46.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs KFS Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while KFS trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs SDA Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 296.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while SDA trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs LAZY Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs RMBL Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while RMBL trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs AZI Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while AZI trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs JZXN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while JZXN trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs GORV Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while GORV trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CZOO Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CZOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs NWTNW Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs UCAR Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while UCAR trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs KXIN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while KXIN trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs VRM Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while VRM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs CTNT Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while CTNT trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs UXIN Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while UXIN trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs LMPX Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 688.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while LMPX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs LOTZ Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.
SFT vs LOTZW Comparison
SFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFT is priced at $0.17, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFT's ROE is -22.22%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFT is more volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFT.