Sonic Automotive, Inc.
Sonic Automotive, Inc. SAH Peers
See (SAH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAH | $88.25 | +0.90% | 3B | 12.58 | $7.02 | +1.87% |
| CPRT | $47.46 | -1.10% | 45.9B | 31.42 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $183.07 | -0.57% | 12.1B | 12.90 | $14.18 | +2.60% |
| KMX | $64.34 | -3.88% | 9.7B | 17.77 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $350.51 | -1.71% | 9.1B | 11.05 | $31.71 | +0.76% |
| AN | $212.86 | -0.92% | 8B | 12.61 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $477.22 | -0.61% | 6.2B | 13.40 | $35.62 | +0.51% |
| ABG | $263.22 | -1.03% | 5.2B | 12.54 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $53.69 | -0.74% | 4.2B | 15.04 | $3.57 | +1.35% |
| RUSHB | $54.02 | -2.60% | 4.1B | 15.13 | $3.57 | +1.35% |
Stock Comparison
SAH vs CPRT Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CPRT trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs PAG Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while PAG trades at $183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs KMX Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while KMX trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs LAD Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while LAD trades at $350.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs AN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while AN trades at $212.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs GPI Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while GPI trades at $477.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs ABG Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while ABG trades at $263.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs RUSHA Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while RUSHA trades at $53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs RUSHB Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while RUSHB trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs ACVA Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while ACVA trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -36.58. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs DRVN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while DRVN trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs KAR Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while KAR trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CWH Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CWH trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -36.60. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs UXIN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while UXIN trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CARS Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 791.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CARS trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CANG Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 552.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CANG trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -177.33. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs NWTN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while NWTN trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs NWTNW Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 497.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CRMT Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 490M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CRMT trades at $59.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs KFS Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while KFS trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -37.31. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs SDA Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while SDA trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs RMBL Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while RMBL trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs LAZY Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs VRM Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while VRM trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs AZI Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while AZI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CZOO Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs GORV Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while GORV trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs UCAR Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while UCAR trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs JZXN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while JZXN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs KXIN Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while KXIN trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs CTNT Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while CTNT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs SFT Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs LMPX Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 272.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while LMPX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs LOTZ Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.
SAH vs LOTZW Comparison
SAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAH stands at 3B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAH is priced at $88.25, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.58, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAH's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAH is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAH.