Sabre Corporation
Sabre Corporation SABR Peers
See (SABR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SABR | $2.55 | -1.36% | 986.97M | -5.66 | -$0.45 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,332.80 | -0.17% | 173.53B | 33.28 | $160.26 | +0.67% |
| ABNB | $126.72 | -0.73% | 79.34B | 32.16 | $3.94 | N/A |
| RCL | $240.14 | +0.73% | 65.21B | 19.52 | $12.30 | +0.71% |
| TCOM | $62.33 | +2.08% | 41.35B | 18.39 | $3.39 | +0.45% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.63B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $158.98 | -1.08% | 20.21B | 18.97 | $8.38 | +0.25% |
| VIK | $43.75 | +1.34% | 19.37B | 34.72 | $1.26 | N/A |
| MMYT | $103.37 | +2.62% | 11.35B | 124.54 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $17.32 | -0.69% | 7.74B | 9.84 | $1.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SABR vs BKNG Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 173.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while BKNG trades at $5,332.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs ABNB Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while ABNB trades at $126.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs RCL Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 65.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while RCL trades at $240.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs TCOM Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 41.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while TCOM trades at $62.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs SABRP Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs EXPE Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 20.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while EXPE trades at $158.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs VIK Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 19.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while VIK trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs MMYT Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while MMYT trades at $103.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 124.54. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs NCLH Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 7.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while NCLH trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs TNL Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while TNL trades at $47.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs DESP Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is 243.75. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs TRIP Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while TRIP trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs LIND Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 557.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while LIND trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs MRNOW Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 170.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while MRNOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs YTRA Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 50.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while YTRA trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -81.99. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs TOUR Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 35.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while TOUR trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs MKGI Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs JXG Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 10.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while JXG trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs NTRP Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while NTRP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs MOND Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87416.00. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.
SABR vs MONDW Comparison
SABR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABR stands at 986.97M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SABR is priced at $2.55, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABR currently has a P/E ratio of -5.66, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SABR is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABR.