Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | $53.38 | +1.95% | 4.2B | 15.19 | $3.51 | +1.31% |
| CPRT | $45.74 | +0.51% | 44.2B | 30.29 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $168.40 | +0.08% | 11.1B | 11.73 | $14.37 | +2.81% |
| KMX | $54.66 | -2.36% | 8.2B | 15.10 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $284.47 | -1.09% | 7.3B | 8.43 | $33.71 | +0.74% |
| AN | $189.27 | -0.69% | 7.1B | 11.88 | $15.93 | N/A |
| GPI | $407.42 | -0.68% | 5.3B | 11.25 | $36.22 | +0.47% |
| ABG | $223.94 | +0.41% | 4.4B | 8.20 | $27.32 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $54.88 | +2.48% | 4.3B | 15.64 | $3.51 | +1.31% |
| DRVN | $16.99 | +1.68% | 2.8B | -9.54 | -$1.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHB vs CPRT Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CPRT trades at $45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CPRT's competition here
RUSHB vs PAG Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while PAG trades at $168.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHB vs KMX Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while KMX trades at $54.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHB vs LAD Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while LAD trades at $284.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHB vs AN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while AN trades at $189.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AN's competition here
RUSHB vs GPI Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while GPI trades at $407.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHB vs ABG Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while ABG trades at $223.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHB vs RUSHA Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while RUSHA trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RUSHA's competition here
RUSHB vs DRVN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while DRVN trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHB vs KAR Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while KAR trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHB vs ACVA Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while ACVA trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHB vs SAH Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while SAH trades at $70.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHB vs CWH Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 930.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CWH trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -61.87. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHB vs CARS Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 792.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CARS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHB vs UXIN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 752M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while UXIN trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTNW Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHB vs CANG Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CANG trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -156.83. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHB vs KFS Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while KFS trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -35.72. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while NWTN trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHB vs CRMT Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CRMT trades at $42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHB vs SDA Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while SDA trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHB vs VRM Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while VRM trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHB vs RMBL Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while RMBL trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHB vs LAZY Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHB vs CZOO Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHB vs AZI Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while AZI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHB vs GORV Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while GORV trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHB vs JZXN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while JZXN trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHB vs UCAR Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while UCAR trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHB vs KXIN Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while KXIN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs CTNT Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while CTNT trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHB vs SFT Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHB vs LMPX Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 498K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while LMPX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZW Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZW's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZ Comparison August 2025
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $53.38, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 15.19, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZ's competition here