Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RUSHB
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | $67.03 | +2.69% | 5.1B | 20.35 | $3.27 | +1.13% |
| CVNA | $318.89 | +1.59% | 68.6B | 37.52 | $8.44 | N/A |
| PAG | $148.25 | -0.73% | 9.8B | 10.53 | $14.13 | +3.60% |
| AN | $194.31 | -1.70% | 6.8B | 11.54 | $17.04 | N/A |
| KMX | $43.38 | +5.21% | 6.3B | 13.97 | $3.05 | N/A |
| LAD | $262.66 | +4.30% | 6B | 7.98 | $32.31 | +0.85% |
| RUSHA | $66.76 | +1.55% | 5.1B | 20.41 | $3.27 | +1.13% |
| GPI | $324.74 | -1.43% | 4.1B | 13.01 | $25.14 | +0.63% |
| ABG | $195.00 | -0.20% | 3.8B | 7.76 | $25.12 | N/A |
| CARG | $35.22 | +5.67% | 3.4B | 17.73 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHB vs CVNA Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CVNA trades at $318.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CVNA's competition here
RUSHB vs PAG Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while PAG trades at $148.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHB vs AN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while AN trades at $194.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AN's competition here
RUSHB vs KMX Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while KMX trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHB vs LAD Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while LAD trades at $262.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHB vs RUSHA Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while RUSHA trades at $66.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RUSHA's competition here
RUSHB vs GPI Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while GPI trades at $324.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHB vs ABG Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while ABG trades at $195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHB vs CARG Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CARG trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CARG's competition here
RUSHB vs OPLN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while OPLN trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 65.90. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check OPLN's competition here
RUSHB vs KAR Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHB vs BGSI Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while BGSI trades at $123.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 152.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check BGSI's competition here
RUSHB vs SAH Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while SAH trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHB vs DRVN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while DRVN trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHB vs ACVA Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while ACVA trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHB vs UXIN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while UXIN trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs CARS Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CARS trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHB vs CWH Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CWH trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHB vs KFS Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while KFS trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHB vs SDA Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while SDA trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHB vs CANG Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CANG trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHB vs RDNW Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RDNW's competition here
RUSHB vs RMBL Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHB vs CRMT Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CRMT trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHB vs LAZY Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHB vs VRM Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while VRM trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHB vs OTH Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while OTH trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check OTH's competition here
RUSHB vs CZOO Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHB vs NWTNW Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHB vs AZI Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while AZI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHB vs CTNT Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while CTNT trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHB vs SFT Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHB vs GORV Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHB vs JZXN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while JZXN trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHB vs LMPX Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 763.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHB vs KXIN Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 165.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while KXIN trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHB vs UCAR Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while UCAR trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZW Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZW's competition here
RUSHB vs LOTZ Comparison April 2026
RUSHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHB stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHB is priced at $67.03, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHB currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHB is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHB.Check LOTZ's competition here