Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. RUSHA Peers
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $50.62 | +0.72% | 4B | 14.18 | $3.57 | +1.42% |
| CPRT | $50.11 | -0.06% | 48.5B | 33.19 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $164.95 | +1.40% | 10.9B | 11.62 | $14.19 | +2.88% |
| KMX | $65.70 | +0.45% | 10B | 20.47 | $3.21 | N/A |
| LAD | $321.60 | +1.34% | 8.4B | 10.15 | $31.69 | +0.67% |
| AN | $187.10 | +0.66% | 7.1B | 11.08 | $16.88 | N/A |
| GPI | $422.94 | +0.79% | 5.5B | 12.09 | $34.97 | +0.46% |
| ABG | $231.99 | +0.85% | 4.6B | 11.05 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $52.69 | +1.04% | 4B | 14.76 | $3.57 | +1.42% |
| DRVN | $18.36 | +4.62% | 3B | -10.31 | -$1.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CPRT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CPRT trades at $50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while PAG trades at $164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while KMX trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while LAD trades at $321.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs AN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while AN trades at $187.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while GPI trades at $422.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while ABG trades at $231.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while RUSHB trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while DRVN trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while ACVA trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -37.57. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while KAR trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while SAH trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CWH trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -35.94. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CARS trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 537.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CANG trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -172.67. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 473.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while NWTN trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 450.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CRMT trades at $54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 53.99. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 366M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while KFS trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -34.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 274.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while SDA trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while RMBL trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while AZI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while JZXN trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while GORV trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while UCAR trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while KXIN trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while VRM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while CTNT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while UXIN trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 666.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while LMPX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LOTZ Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LOTZW Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $50.62, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.18, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.