Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RUSHA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $71.54 | +1.91% | 5.5B | 21.78 | $3.27 | +1.05% |
| CVNA | $335.94 | -0.85% | 70.9B | 38.74 | $8.44 | N/A |
| PAG | $156.62 | +2.19% | 10.2B | 10.98 | $14.13 | +3.45% |
| AN | $200.97 | +2.06% | 7B | 11.76 | $17.05 | N/A |
| KMX | $46.33 | +4.71% | 6.7B | 14.86 | $3.05 | N/A |
| LAD | $273.01 | +3.70% | 6.2B | 8.26 | $32.31 | +0.82% |
| RUSHB | $71.92 | +1.70% | 5.6B | 22.19 | $3.27 | +1.05% |
| GPI | $338.37 | +1.73% | 4B | 13.46 | $25.11 | +0.61% |
| ABG | $203.86 | +1.58% | 3.9B | 8.04 | $25.12 | N/A |
| CARG | $33.90 | -1.95% | 3.4B | 17.55 | $1.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CVNA Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CVNA trades at $335.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CVNA's competition here
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while PAG trades at $156.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHA vs AN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while AN trades at $200.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AN's competition here
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while KMX trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while LAD trades at $273.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while RUSHB trades at $71.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RUSHB's competition here
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while GPI trades at $338.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while ABG trades at $203.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHA vs CARG Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CARG trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARG's competition here
RUSHA vs OPLN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while OPLN trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 66.07. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OPLN's competition here
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while KAR trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHA vs BGSI Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while BGSI trades at $116.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 146.20. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check BGSI's competition here
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while SAH trades at $67.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while DRVN trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 756.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while ACVA trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 620.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while UXIN trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 545.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CARS trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 455.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CWH trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while KFS trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.77. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while SDA trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CANG trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHA vs RDNW Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RDNW's competition here
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CRMT trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHA vs OTH Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 91.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while OTH trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -46.87. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OTH's competition here
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while VRM trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while AZI trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while CTNT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while JZXN trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 763.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 161.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while KXIN trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 71.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while UCAR trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZW Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZW's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZ Comparison April 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $71.54, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.78, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZ's competition here