Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $56.47 | +2.90% | 4.4B | 16.09 | $3.51 | +1.28% |
| CPRT | $46.55 | +1.77% | 45B | 30.82 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $176.92 | +5.06% | 11.7B | 12.32 | $14.37 | +2.67% |
| KMX | $56.10 | +2.63% | 8.4B | 15.50 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $297.79 | +4.68% | 7.6B | 8.84 | $33.71 | +0.72% |
| AN | $195.50 | +3.29% | 7.4B | 12.28 | $15.93 | N/A |
| GPI | $420.02 | +3.09% | 5.4B | 11.59 | $36.22 | +0.46% |
| ABG | $229.16 | +2.33% | 4.5B | 8.39 | $27.32 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $54.61 | +2.30% | 4.3B | 15.56 | $3.51 | +1.28% |
| DRVN | $17.33 | +2.00% | 2.8B | -9.74 | -$1.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CPRT Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CPRT trades at $46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CPRT's competition here
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while PAG trades at $176.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while KMX trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while LAD trades at $297.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHA vs AN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while AN trades at $195.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AN's competition here
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while GPI trades at $420.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while ABG trades at $229.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while RUSHB trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RUSHB's competition here
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while DRVN trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while KAR trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while ACVA trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while SAH trades at $72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 939.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CWH trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 793M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CARS trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 766.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while UXIN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 490.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CANG trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -157.33. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while KFS trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while NWTN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 361.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CRMT trades at $43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while SDA trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while VRM trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while RMBL trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while AZI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while GORV trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while JZXN trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while UCAR trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while KXIN trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while CTNT trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 455.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while LMPX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZW Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZW's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZ Comparison August 2025
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $56.47, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZ's competition here