Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. RUSHA Peers
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $52.28 | +1.14% | 4.14B | 14.64 | $3.57 | +1.38% |
| CPRT | $63.84 | +1.38% | 61.68B | 42.85 | $1.49 | N/A |
| PAG | $166.56 | +0.45% | 11.02B | 11.74 | $14.19 | +2.67% |
| KMX | $67.25 | -0.96% | 10.24B | 20.95 | $3.21 | N/A |
| LAD | $324.05 | +1.13% | 8.44B | 10.93 | $29.65 | +0.66% |
| AN | $190.17 | -0.27% | 7.17B | 11.25 | $16.91 | N/A |
| GPI | $444.83 | +0.90% | 5.75B | 12.11 | $36.73 | +0.43% |
| ABG | $234.88 | +0.51% | 4.62B | 11.25 | $20.87 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $56.38 | +0.45% | 4.08B | 15.79 | $3.57 | +1.38% |
| ACVA | $17.05 | +0.71% | 3.07B | -38.75 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CPRT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 61.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CPRT trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while PAG trades at $166.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while KMX trades at $67.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while LAD trades at $324.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs AN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while AN trades at $190.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while GPI trades at $444.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while ABG trades at $234.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while RUSHB trades at $56.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA and RUSHB have similar daily volatility (1.98).
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while ACVA trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while DRVN trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while KAR trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while SAH trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CWH trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -33.54. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 688.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CARS trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 546.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while NWTN trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 427.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CRMT trades at $51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 51.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 425.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CANG trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 329.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while SDA trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 281.43M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while KFS trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.21. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 150.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while AZI trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 84.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while RMBL trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 30.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while JZXN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CZOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while GORV trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 12.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while UCAR trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 11.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while KXIN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while VRM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while CTNT trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 2.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while UXIN trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.14B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 668709.00. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $52.28, while LMPX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.