Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | $62.36 | +0.99% | 4.8B | 19.07 | $3.27 | +1.22% |
| CVNA | $305.89 | +1.91% | 66.3B | 36.16 | $8.46 | N/A |
| PAG | $144.18 | -1.20% | 9.5B | 10.20 | $14.13 | +3.67% |
| AN | $182.78 | -0.37% | 6.3B | 10.72 | $17.04 | N/A |
| KMX | $41.75 | -0.23% | 6.1B | 13.69 | $3.05 | N/A |
| LAD | $252.45 | -0.88% | 5.9B | 7.81 | $32.32 | +0.86% |
| RUSHB | $60.24 | +0.92% | 4.6B | 18.42 | $3.27 | +1.22% |
| GPI | $299.84 | -0.02% | 3.8B | 11.94 | $25.13 | +0.68% |
| ABG | $191.00 | -2.78% | 3.7B | 7.60 | $25.13 | N/A |
| BGSI | $157.57 | +2.54% | 3.4B | 213.55 | $0.74 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
RUSHA vs CVNA Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CVNA trades at $305.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CVNA's competition here
RUSHA vs PAG Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while PAG trades at $144.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check PAG's competition here
RUSHA vs AN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while AN trades at $182.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AN's competition here
RUSHA vs KMX Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while KMX trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KMX's competition here
RUSHA vs LAD Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while LAD trades at $252.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAD's competition here
RUSHA vs RUSHB Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while RUSHB trades at $60.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RUSHB's competition here
RUSHA vs GPI Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while GPI trades at $299.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GPI's competition here
RUSHA vs ABG Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while ABG trades at $191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ABG's competition here
RUSHA vs BGSI Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while BGSI trades at $157.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 213.55. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check BGSI's competition here
RUSHA vs CARG Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CARG trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARG's competition here
RUSHA vs KAR Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while KAR trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KAR's competition here
RUSHA vs OPLN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while OPLN trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OPLN's competition here
RUSHA vs SAH Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while SAH trades at $60.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SAH's competition here
RUSHA vs DRVN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while DRVN trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check DRVN's competition here
RUSHA vs ACVA Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 847.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while ACVA trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check ACVA's competition here
RUSHA vs UXIN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 747.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while UXIN trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs CARS Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CARS trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CARS's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTN's competition here
RUSHA vs CWH Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CWH trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CWH's competition here
RUSHA vs KFS Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while KFS trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KFS's competition here
RUSHA vs CANG Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CANG trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CANG's competition here
RUSHA vs SDA Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while SDA trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SDA's competition here
RUSHA vs RDNW Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RDNW's competition here
RUSHA vs RMBL Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check RMBL's competition here
RUSHA vs CRMT Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CRMT trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CRMT's competition here
RUSHA vs LAZY Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LAZY's competition here
RUSHA vs VRM Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while VRM trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check VRM's competition here
RUSHA vs OTH Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while OTH trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check OTH's competition here
RUSHA vs CZOO Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CZOO's competition here
RUSHA vs NWTNW Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check NWTNW's competition here
RUSHA vs CTNT Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while CTNT trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check CTNT's competition here
RUSHA vs SFT Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check SFT's competition here
RUSHA vs UCAR Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while UCAR trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check UCAR's competition here
RUSHA vs JZXN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while JZXN trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check JZXN's competition here
RUSHA vs GORV Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check GORV's competition here
RUSHA vs AZI Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while AZI trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check AZI's competition here
RUSHA vs LMPX Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 790.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LMPX's competition here
RUSHA vs KXIN Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 128.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while KXIN trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -5.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check KXIN's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZW Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZW's competition here
RUSHA vs LOTZ Comparison March 2026
RUSHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSHA stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSHA is priced at $62.36, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSHA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.07, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RUSHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSHA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSHA.Check LOTZ's competition here