Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. RCL Peers
See (RCL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCL | $242.20 | +3.83% | 65.77B | 19.71 | $12.29 | +0.71% |
| BKNG | $5,194.99 | +2.41% | 169.05B | 32.36 | $160.56 | +0.69% |
| ABNB | $134.21 | +5.64% | 84.07B | 34.06 | $3.94 | N/A |
| TCOM | $65.52 | +6.62% | 42.90B | 19.21 | $3.41 | +0.43% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.63B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $167.25 | +6.76% | 20.41B | 18.71 | $8.94 | +0.24% |
| VIK | $45.54 | +5.29% | 20.16B | 126.50 | $0.36 | N/A |
| MMYT | $103.73 | +5.93% | 11.39B | 54.59 | $1.90 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.15 | +8.19% | 8.56B | 10.88 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TNL | $50.34 | +5.47% | 3.34B | 9.15 | $5.50 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
RCL vs BKNG Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 169.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while BKNG trades at $5,194.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs ABNB Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 84.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while ABNB trades at $134.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TCOM Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 42.90B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while TCOM trades at $65.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs SABRP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs EXPE Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 20.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while EXPE trades at $167.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL and EXPE have similar daily volatility (3.42).
RCL vs VIK Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 20.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while VIK trades at $45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 126.50. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MMYT Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while MMYT trades at $103.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 54.59. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs NCLH Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while NCLH trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TNL Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while TNL trades at $50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TRIP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while TRIP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 382.50. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs DESP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while DESP trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -648.67. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs SABR Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while SABR trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs LIND Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 579.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while LIND trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MRNOW Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 169.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while MRNOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs YTRA Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 42.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while YTRA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TOUR Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 37.46M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while TOUR trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MKGI Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs NTRP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 3.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while NTRP trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs JXG Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 3.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while JXG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JXG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MOND Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 65.77B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87416.00. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $242.20, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.71, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.