Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. RCL Peers
See (RCL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCL | $339.09 | +1.65% | 92.7B | 27.80 | $12.28 | +0.72% |
| BKNG | $5,693.07 | +0.44% | 186B | 35.58 | $160.64 | +0.80% |
| ABNB | $135.69 | -0.85% | 85.8B | 34.76 | $3.94 | N/A |
| TCOM | $62.05 | +1.14% | 40.4B | 18.09 | $3.42 | +0.45% |
| VIK | $56.52 | +0.44% | 25.1B | 76.51 | $0.74 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $184.12 | +4.56% | 22.3B | 21.89 | $8.36 | +0.44% |
| MMYT | $91.60 | -1.88% | 12B | 111.01 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $22.89 | +4.21% | 10.3B | 13.15 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TNL | $57.33 | +1.65% | 3.8B | 10.53 | $5.50 | +4.51% |
Stock Comparison
RCL vs BKNG Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while BKNG trades at $5,693.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs ABNB Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while ABNB trades at $135.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TCOM Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while TCOM trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs VIK Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while VIK trades at $56.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 76.51. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs SABRP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs EXPE Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while EXPE trades at $184.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MMYT Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while MMYT trades at $91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 111.01. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs NCLH Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while NCLH trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TNL Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while TNL trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TRIP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while TRIP trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 46.56. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs DESP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs SABR Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while SABR trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs LIND Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while LIND trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs YTRA Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while YTRA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -47.88. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs TOUR Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while TOUR trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs NTRP Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while NTRP trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MRNOW Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while MRNOW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MKGI Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs JXG Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while JXG trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MOND Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.
RCL vs MONDW Comparison
RCL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCL stands at 92.7B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCL is priced at $339.09, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCL's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RCL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCL.