Perfect Corp.
Perfect Corp. (PERF-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PERF-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERF-WT | $0.03 | +1.27% | 83M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | $175.95 | -0.19% | 204.8B | 24.18 | $7.27 | +1.21% |
| CRM | $180.07 | +2.13% | 171.1B | 23.60 | $7.63 | +0.94% |
| APP | $481.68 | -0.87% | 161.8B | 41.81 | $11.52 | N/A |
| UBER | $71.82 | -2.43% | 146.2B | 17.82 | $4.03 | N/A |
| SHOP | $103.00 | -1.77% | 133.6B | 100.97 | $1.02 | N/A |
| NOW | $102.13 | +2.45% | 105.3B | 60.79 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $373.59 | +4.22% | 103B | 87.29 | $4.28 | N/A |
| ADBE | $244.76 | +0.27% | 98.9B | 14.27 | $17.15 | N/A |
| INTU | $319.94 | +4.19% | 87.5B | 19.51 | $16.40 | +1.50% |
Stock Comparison
PERF-WT vs SAP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 204.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SAP trades at $175.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SAP's competition here
PERF-WT vs CRM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CRM trades at $180.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CRM's competition here
PERF-WT vs APP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while APP trades at $481.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check APP's competition here
PERF-WT vs UBER Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while UBER trades at $71.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check UBER's competition here
PERF-WT vs SHOP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SHOP trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 100.97. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SHOP's competition here
PERF-WT vs NOW Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NOW trades at $102.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NOW's competition here
PERF-WT vs CDNS Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CDNS trades at $373.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 87.29. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CDNS's competition here
PERF-WT vs ADBE Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ADBE trades at $244.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ADBE's competition here
PERF-WT vs INTU Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while INTU trades at $319.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check INTU's competition here
PERF-WT vs DDOG Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DDOG trades at $222.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 570.05. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DDOG's competition here
PERF-WT vs SNOW Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SNOW trades at $172.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -43.49. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SNOW's competition here
PERF-WT vs ADSK Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ADSK trades at $240.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ADSK's competition here
PERF-WT vs MSTR Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while MSTR trades at $159.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check MSTR's competition here
PERF-WT vs WDAY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while WDAY trades at $128.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 49.28. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check WDAY's competition here
PERF-WT vs ROP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ROP trades at $326.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ROP's competition here
PERF-WT vs ANSS Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ANSS's competition here
PERF-WT vs GTOP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GTOP trades at $47.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GTOP's competition here
PERF-WT vs ZM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ZM trades at $105.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ZM's competition here
PERF-WT vs STRF Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while STRF trades at $101.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check STRF's competition here
PERF-WT vs STRC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while STRC trades at $99.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check STRC's competition here
PERF-WT vs FICO Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while FICO trades at $1,239.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check FICO's competition here
PERF-WT vs TEAM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while TEAM trades at $85.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -104.16. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check TEAM's competition here
PERF-WT vs STRK Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while STRK trades at $73.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check STRK's competition here
PERF-WT vs PTC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PTC trades at $148.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PTC's competition here
PERF-WT vs AZPN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check AZPN's competition here
PERF-WT vs SSNC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SSNC trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SSNC's competition here
PERF-WT vs GRAB Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GRAB trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 87.75. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GRAB's competition here
PERF-WT vs TYL Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while TYL trades at $313.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.13. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check TYL's competition here
PERF-WT vs DT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DT trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 76.30. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DT's competition here
PERF-WT vs GWRE Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GWRE trades at $140.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 63.42. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GWRE's competition here
PERF-WT vs BKI Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BKI's competition here
PERF-WT vs DAY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DAY's competition here
PERF-WT vs U Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while U trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check U's competition here
PERF-WT vs FIG Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while FIG trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check FIG's competition here
PERF-WT vs XM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check XM's competition here
PERF-WT vs CDAY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CDAY's competition here
PERF-WT vs HUBS Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while HUBS trades at $201.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 109.17. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check HUBS's competition here
PERF-WT vs BSY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BSY trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BSY's competition here
PERF-WT vs DOCU Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DOCU trades at $49.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DOCU's competition here
PERF-WT vs FROG Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while FROG trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -134.53. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check FROG's competition here
PERF-WT vs YMM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while YMM trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check YMM's competition here
PERF-WT vs OCFT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check OCFT's competition here
PERF-WT vs MANH Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while MANH trades at $138.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check MANH's competition here
PERF-WT vs NATI Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NATI's competition here
PERF-WT vs SMAR Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SMAR's competition here
PERF-WT vs PAYC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PAYC trades at $137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PAYC's competition here
PERF-WT vs CWAN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CWAN trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.06. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CWAN's competition here
PERF-WT vs PCOR Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PCOR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -91.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PCOR's competition here
PERF-WT vs IDCC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while IDCC trades at $260.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check IDCC's competition here
PERF-WT vs DSGX Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DSGX trades at $71.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DSGX's competition here
PERF-WT vs COUP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check COUP's competition here
PERF-WT vs PCTY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PCTY trades at $113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PCTY's competition here
PERF-WT vs YOU Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while YOU trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check YOU's competition here
PERF-WT vs TTAN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while TTAN trades at $63.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -36.51. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check TTAN's competition here
PERF-WT vs APPF Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while APPF trades at $164.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check APPF's competition here
PERF-WT vs PEGA Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PEGA trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PEGA's competition here
PERF-WT vs OTEX Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while OTEX trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check OTEX's competition here
PERF-WT vs ESTC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ESTC trades at $54.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -69.35. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ESTC's competition here
PERF-WT vs NICE Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NICE trades at $94.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NICE's competition here
PERF-WT vs LYFT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while LYFT trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check LYFT's competition here
PERF-WT vs COMP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while COMP trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 420.25. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check COMP's competition here
PERF-WT vs DUOL Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DUOL trades at $106.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DUOL's competition here
PERF-WT vs GBTG Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GBTG trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GBTG's competition here
PERF-WT vs ZETA Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ZETA trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -188.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ZETA's competition here
PERF-WT vs NAVN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NAVN trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NAVN's competition here
PERF-WT vs GTLB Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GTLB trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -78.62. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GTLB's competition here
PERF-WT vs CVLT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CVLT trades at $107.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CVLT's competition here
PERF-WT vs GRND-WT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check GRND-WT's competition here
PERF-WT vs KC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while KC trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check KC's competition here
PERF-WT vs CVT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check CVT's competition here
PERF-WT vs PYCR Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PYCR's competition here
PERF-WT vs MNDY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while MNDY trades at $79.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check MNDY's competition here
PERF-WT vs SRAD Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SRAD trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 50.13. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SRAD's competition here
PERF-WT vs RNG Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while RNG trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 46.30. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check RNG's competition here
PERF-WT vs PWSC Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PWSC's competition here
PERF-WT vs BILL Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BILL trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -157.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BILL's competition here
PERF-WT vs BOX Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BOX trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BOX's competition here
PERF-WT vs RUM Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while RUM trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -19.08. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check RUM's competition here
PERF-WT vs SOUN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while SOUN trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check SOUN's competition here
PERF-WT vs AYX Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check AYX's competition here
PERF-WT vs STUB Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while STUB trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check STUB's competition here
PERF-WT vs ENV Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ENV's competition here
PERF-WT vs INST Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check INST's competition here
PERF-WT vs BTDR Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BTDR trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BTDR's competition here
PERF-WT vs ZI Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ZI's competition here
PERF-WT vs NATL Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NATL trades at $44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NATL's competition here
PERF-WT vs BULL Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BULL trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BULL's competition here
PERF-WT vs LIF Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while LIF trades at $40.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check LIF's competition here
PERF-WT vs DAVE Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DAVE trades at $228.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DAVE's competition here
PERF-WT vs ADEA Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while ADEA trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check ADEA's competition here
PERF-WT vs QTWO Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while QTWO trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT and QTWO have similar daily volatility (3.23).Check QTWO's competition here
PERF-WT vs PTRN Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while PTRN trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check PTRN's competition here
PERF-WT vs WK Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while WK trades at $50.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 209.54. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check WK's competition here
PERF-WT vs BRZE Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while BRZE trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -19.96. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check BRZE's competition here
PERF-WT vs NP Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while NP trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -154.61. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check NP's competition here
PERF-WT vs DBD Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DBD trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DBD's competition here
PERF-WT vs FSLY Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while FSLY trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check FSLY's competition here
PERF-WT vs DCT Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check DCT's competition here
PERF-WT vs FRSH Comparison May 2026
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 83M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.03, while FRSH trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.Check FRSH's competition here