Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCLH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | $23.96 | +2.00% | 10.9B | 17.25 | $1.39 | N/A |
| BKNG | $4,068.56 | +5.11% | 131.1B | 26.48 | $153.67 | +0.95% |
| RCL | $316.50 | +4.58% | 86.5B | 20.31 | $15.62 | +1.10% |
| ABNB | $125.66 | +2.20% | 75.3B | 31.18 | $4.03 | N/A |
| TCOM | $53.77 | +1.59% | 35.1B | 14.34 | $3.75 | +0.52% |
| VIK | $77.22 | +1.02% | 34.2B | 36.04 | $2.14 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $198.12 | +5.10% | 23.2B | 20.20 | $9.81 | +0.81% |
| MMYT | $56.32 | +1.86% | 5.4B | 108.31 | $0.52 | N/A |
| TNL | $74.99 | +0.73% | 4.8B | 12.42 | $6.04 | +3.00% |
Stock Comparison
NCLH vs BKNG Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while BKNG trades at $4,068.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check BKNG's competition here
NCLH vs RCL Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while RCL trades at $316.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check RCL's competition here
NCLH vs ABNB Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while ABNB trades at $125.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check ABNB's competition here
NCLH vs TCOM Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while TCOM trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TCOM's competition here
NCLH vs VIK Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while VIK trades at $77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VIK's ROE of +6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check VIK's competition here
NCLH vs SABRP Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABRP's competition here
NCLH vs EXPE Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while EXPE trades at $198.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check EXPE's competition here
NCLH vs MMYT Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while MMYT trades at $56.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 108.31. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MMYT's competition here
NCLH vs TNL Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while TNL trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TNL's competition here
NCLH vs DESP Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check DESP's competition here
NCLH vs TRIP Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while TRIP trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TRIP's competition here
NCLH vs LIND Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while LIND trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check LIND's competition here
NCLH vs NUTR Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check NUTR's competition here
NCLH vs SABR Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 322.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while SABR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABR's competition here
NCLH vs AHMA Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while AHMA trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check AHMA's competition here
NCLH vs MRNOW Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while MRNOW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MRNOW's competition here
NCLH vs YTRA Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while YTRA trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check YTRA's competition here
NCLH vs TOUR Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while TOUR trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TOUR's competition here
NCLH vs NTRP Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while NTRP trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check NTRP's competition here
NCLH vs MKGI Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MKGI's competition here
NCLH vs JXG Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 855.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while JXG trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check JXG's competition here
NCLH vs MOND Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MOND's competition here
NCLH vs MONDW Comparison February 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $23.96, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MONDW's competition here