Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCLH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | $25.00 | -1.34% | 11.2B | 17.13 | $1.46 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,457.86 | -0.33% | 176.9B | 38.09 | $143.28 | +0.67% |
| RCL | $311.36 | -1.37% | 84.5B | 23.14 | $13.45 | +0.78% |
| ABNB | $129.96 | -0.76% | 81.4B | 32.98 | $3.94 | N/A |
| TCOM | $61.17 | -1.43% | 40B | 18.04 | $3.39 | +0.46% |
| VIK | $58.21 | -1.10% | 25.8B | 78.66 | $0.74 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $181.84 | -1.70% | 22.1B | 21.70 | $8.38 | +0.44% |
| MMYT | $92.74 | -0.88% | 8.8B | 107.84 | $0.86 | N/A |
| TNL | $59.32 | -0.15% | 3.8B | 10.13 | $5.85 | +3.58% |
Stock Comparison
NCLH vs BKNG Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while BKNG trades at $5,457.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check BKNG's competition here
NCLH vs RCL Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while RCL trades at $311.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check RCL's competition here
NCLH vs ABNB Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while ABNB trades at $129.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check ABNB's competition here
NCLH vs TCOM Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while TCOM trades at $61.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TCOM's competition here
NCLH vs VIK Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while VIK trades at $58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 78.66. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check VIK's competition here
NCLH vs SABRP Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABRP's competition here
NCLH vs EXPE Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while EXPE trades at $181.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check EXPE's competition here
NCLH vs MMYT Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while MMYT trades at $92.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 107.84. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MMYT's competition here
NCLH vs TNL Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while TNL trades at $59.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TNL's competition here
NCLH vs TRIP Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while TRIP trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TRIP's competition here
NCLH vs DESP Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check DESP's competition here
NCLH vs SABR Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while SABR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABR's competition here
NCLH vs LIND Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 745.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while LIND trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -50.48. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check LIND's competition here
NCLH vs MRNOW Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 487.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while MRNOW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MRNOW's competition here
NCLH vs YTRA Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while YTRA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.07. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check YTRA's competition here
NCLH vs TOUR Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while TOUR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TOUR's competition here
NCLH vs NTRP Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while NTRP trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check NTRP's competition here
NCLH vs MKGI Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MKGI's competition here
NCLH vs JXG Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while JXG trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check JXG's competition here
NCLH vs MOND Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MOND's competition here
NCLH vs MONDW Comparison August 2025
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $25.00, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MONDW's competition here