Murano Global Investments PLC Warrants
Murano Global Investments PLC Warrants MRNOW Peers
See (MRNOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNOW | $0.14 | -4.26% | 10.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,304.03 | +0.34% | 172.6B | 33.03 | $160.58 | +0.69% |
| ABNB | $131.69 | -0.36% | 82.5B | 33.42 | $3.94 | N/A |
| RCL | $272.39 | +1.72% | 74B | 22.18 | $12.28 | +0.90% |
| TCOM | $55.85 | -1.22% | 36.8B | 16.38 | $3.41 | +0.50% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| VIK | $49.49 | +1.71% | 21.9B | 66.88 | $0.74 | N/A |
| EXPE | $164.88 | +1.49% | 20B | 19.68 | $8.38 | +0.49% |
| MMYT | $91.65 | -2.94% | 10.2B | 110.42 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $18.87 | +2.61% | 8.4B | 10.72 | $1.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRNOW vs BKNG Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while BKNG trades at $5,304.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs ABNB Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while ABNB trades at $131.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs RCL Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while RCL trades at $272.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs TCOM Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while TCOM trades at $55.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs SABRP Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs VIK Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while VIK trades at $49.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs EXPE Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while EXPE trades at $164.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs MMYT Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while MMYT trades at $91.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 110.42. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs NCLH Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while NCLH trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs TNL Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while TNL trades at $48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs DESP Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs TRIP Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while TRIP trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs SABR Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while SABR trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs LIND Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 609.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while LIND trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs YTRA Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while YTRA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -49.91. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs TOUR Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while TOUR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs NTRP Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while NTRP trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs MKGI Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs JXG Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while JXG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs MOND Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.
MRNOW vs MONDW Comparison
MRNOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRNOW stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRNOW is priced at $0.14, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRNOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRNOW's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MRNOW is more volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRNOW.