Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | $13.27 | +0.00% | 739.7M | -50.00 | -$0.27 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,484.77 | +0.00% | 176.8B | 38.07 | $143.28 | +0.67% |
| RCL | $312.30 | +0.00% | 85.3B | 23.34 | $13.45 | +0.78% |
| ABNB | $124.64 | +0.00% | 77.9B | 30.29 | $4.13 | N/A |
| TCOM | $60.31 | +0.00% | 42B | 18.29 | $3.41 | +0.45% |
| VIK | $60.02 | +0.00% | 26.9B | 82.01 | $0.74 | N/A |
| EXPE | $207.20 | +0.00% | 24.5B | 25.58 | $8.11 | +0.39% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $24.36 | +0.00% | 11B | 16.65 | $1.46 | N/A |
| MMYT | $94.33 | +0.01% | 9.4B | 114.66 | $0.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIND vs BKNG Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 176.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while BKNG trades at $5,484.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check BKNG's competition here
LIND vs RCL Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while RCL trades at $312.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check RCL's competition here
LIND vs ABNB Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while ABNB trades at $124.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check ABNB's competition here
LIND vs TCOM Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while TCOM trades at $60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TCOM's competition here
LIND vs VIK Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while VIK trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 82.01. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check VIK's competition here
LIND vs EXPE Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while EXPE trades at $207.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check EXPE's competition here
LIND vs SABRP Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check SABRP's competition here
LIND vs NCLH Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while NCLH trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check NCLH's competition here
LIND vs MMYT Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while MMYT trades at $94.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 114.66. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MMYT's competition here
LIND vs TNL Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while TNL trades at $60.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TNL's competition here
LIND vs TRIP Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while TRIP trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TRIP's competition here
LIND vs DESP Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check DESP's competition here
LIND vs SABR Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while SABR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check SABR's competition here
LIND vs MRNOW Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 484.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while MRNOW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MRNOW's competition here
LIND vs YTRA Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while YTRA trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -127.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check YTRA's competition here
LIND vs TOUR Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while TOUR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TOUR's competition here
LIND vs NTRP Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while NTRP trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check NTRP's competition here
LIND vs MKGI Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MKGI's competition here
LIND vs JXG Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while JXG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check JXG's competition here
LIND vs MOND Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOND's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MOND's competition here
LIND vs MONDW Comparison August 2025
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 739.7M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $13.27, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MONDW's competition here