Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. LIND Peers
See (LIND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | $10.56 | -1.40% | 577.7M | -18.53 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| BKNG | $5,475.26 | +0.43% | 178.2B | 33.37 | $164.10 | +0.65% |
| ABNB | $128.65 | -0.58% | 80.6B | 32.74 | $3.93 | N/A |
| RCL | $250.77 | -1.87% | 68.1B | 20.40 | $12.29 | +0.67% |
| TCOM | $63.16 | +2.28% | 41.3B | 18.74 | $3.37 | +0.44% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| EXPE | $167.69 | +1.64% | 20.4B | 20.01 | $8.38 | +0.24% |
| VIK | $44.33 | -1.31% | 19.6B | 35.18 | $1.26 | N/A |
| MMYT | $101.08 | +0.17% | 11.1B | 121.78 | $0.83 | N/A |
| NCLH | $17.54 | -3.07% | 7.8B | 9.96 | $1.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIND vs BKNG Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while BKNG trades at $5,475.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs ABNB Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while ABNB trades at $128.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs RCL Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while RCL trades at $250.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs TCOM Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while TCOM trades at $63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs SABRP Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SABRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs EXPE Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while EXPE trades at $167.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs VIK Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while VIK trades at $44.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs MMYT Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while MMYT trades at $101.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 121.78. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs NCLH Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while NCLH trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs TNL Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while TNL trades at $48.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs TRIP Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while TRIP trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs DESP Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is 243.75. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DESP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs SABR Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while SABR trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SABR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs MRNOW Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while MRNOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs YTRA Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while YTRA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -90.01. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YTRA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs TOUR Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while TOUR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs MKGI Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs JXG Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while JXG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs NTRP Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while NTRP trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTRP's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs MOND Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOND's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.
LIND vs MONDW Comparison
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 577.7M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $10.56, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -18.53, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.